Diseases & HPV types.
Abstract
We intend to delve into the history of evolution and development of human papilloma virus vaccine (HPV Vaccine). The related ethical misconduct as a learning exercise shall be explored and the lessons learnt will spur better research. The present use oh HPV vaccine, tolerability, efficacy, and safety will be highlighted and explained. The factors associated with the perception leading to vaccine hesitancy would also be discussed. We shall also look at the types of HPV vaccines available, and the regimens implemented. The present challenges in HPV vaccines and the potential strategies to overcome them shall be dealt with. Venturing into vaccines is very essential.
Keywords
- HPV vaccine
- consent
- ethical misconduct
- effectiveness
- safety
1. Introduction
It has been said that communities, countries, and ultimately the world are only as strong as the health of their women. Cervical cancer is a bane to women in their reproductive age. Addressing this dynamic issue will keep societies intact. Globally, cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women, with nearly 6,04,000 new cases being reported in 2020. Almost 90% of Cervical cancer related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection globally [1, 2, 3]. Though majority of HPV infections are asymptomatic with spontaneous resolution, persistent infections pose the risk of developing into anogenital warts, precancerous lesions, and cervical, anogenital, or oropharyngeal cancers in both women and men. Over 200 identified HPV types exist, each with its own distinct tropism – a preference for specific tissues. Low-risk HPV strains like 6 and 11, often acquired through skin-to-skin contact, are the culprits behind familiar warts, whereas the high-risk HPV strains, like 16 and 18, promote uncontrolled proliferation, paving way for the development of various cancers [1, 2, 3].
The history and discovery of the human papillomavirus (HPV) cradles a fascinating journey through scientific theories, scientific investigations, virology, and medical breakthroughs. Despite being a radical breakthrough in preventing cancer, the evolution of HPV vaccines brought home some disregarded ethical issues. HPV, the human papilloma virus is a diverse group of DNA viruses, that was first identified and studied in the mid-20th century, paving way for understanding its implications in various medical conditions, particularly in the realm of oncology. Head start research began in the 1930s and 1940s with focus on causative agents behind genital warts and cervical cancer [1, 2].
The identification and isolation of HPV strains happened gradually over years. History was etched in 1976, with isolation of the first HPV types, HPV-1 and HPV-2, from plantar warts by Dr. F.M. Jablonska-Kaszewska and colleagues. It wasn’t until the use of techniques like DNA hybridization during the 1970s and early 1980s that identification of specific types of HPV associated with cervical cancer was made possible. Dr. Zur Hausen and his team in the early 1980s, identified HPV types 16 and 18 as the prominent culprits behind cervical cancer. Dr. Zur Hausen’s groundbreaking discoveries led to a paradigm shift in understanding the role of HPV in cervical cancer and thus initiating a cascade of research in this arena. He was later awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2008.
Following these discoveries, the development of HPV vaccines became a significant stride in preventive medicine. The first HPV vaccine, Gardasil, targeting the most prevalent cancer-causing HPV types was introduced in 2006 [3, 4]. Subsequent advancements led to the development of more comprehensive vaccines with broader coverage against multiple high-risk HPV strains. Vaccination offers robust protection against HPV-associated cancers and precancerous lesions. Research into HPV’s implications in various cancers has propelled medical understanding and kickstarting of public health initiatives. Ongoing efforts tend to focus on improving vaccination accessibility, enhancing screening methods, and expanding knowledge of HPV-associated diseases, emphasizing its role in diverse malignancies.
For bringing this into action, the World Health Organization (WHO) evolved strategies for cervical cancer elimination. Achieving a global target of 90% vaccination coverage, providing 70% twice-lifetime screening, and enabling 90% treatment of preinvasive lesions and invasive cancer by 2030 was devised. Global statistics on HPV disease prevalence and the extent of vaccination coverage provided will help in achieving this global target by 2030.
2. Epidemiology
Global statistics reveal that this preventable disease had claimed the lives of over 310,000 women in 2018 [5]. Around 90% of the deaths reported occurred in the low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). This same year saw approximately 570,000 new cases of cervical cancer being reported. Five major genera of HPV have been identified as alpha, beta, gamma, mu, and nu. The most common identifies variant is gamma with 99 known HPV types. A recent study has further identified 69 additional gamma variants. (VIDE Figure 1).
An alpha subgroup of human papillomavirus has been attributed to be a high-risk group (HR HPV). They are implicated in the progression of HPV infections to anogenital cancer and a subset of head and neck cancer. Though the beta and gamma genera are present on the skin surface in the general population, the etiological role of beta papillomaviruses (beta HPVs) in non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), is gaining importance. Studies have revealed that the oncoproteins E6 and E7 alter host immune response pathways, promote cellular transformation, and establish a persistent HPV infection thereby progressing to cervical cancer. E6 and E7 oncoproteins need to be expressed continuously for mucosal HR HPV type infection maintenance. But this is not required in case of cutaneous HPV types progressing to skin cancers. Beta HPV type act as facilitators of skin carcinogenesis especially NMSC by amassing UV radiation induced DNA breaks and mutations [6, 7].
3. Etiopathogenesis
Various factors influence the pathogenesis of HPV. Viral genotype, host susceptibility, immune response, and environmental factors contribute to the clinical manifestations associated with HPV infection. Anybody can contract HPV, but certain factors increase the likelihood like – multiple sexual partners, early age of sexual debut, weakened immune system as in patients with HIV/AIDS.
HPV is a diverse family of non-enveloped, double-stranded DNA viruses, with various genotypes exhibiting exquisite tropism for specific epithelial tissues. Low-risk strains, commonly HPV6 and 11 have a predilection for skin keratinocytes, leading to common and plantar warts. High-risk genotypes like HPV16 and 18, exhibit a predilection for mucosal epithelia, of anogenital and oropharyngeal regions, thus leading to development of various cancers associated with HPV [1] (VIDE Table 1).
S. No | Diseases | Associated HPV types |
---|---|---|
1 | Cutaneous warts | 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 27,57 |
2 | Anogenital warts | 6, 11, 53 |
3 | Mucosal cancers | 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, 73, 82 |
4 | Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers | 1, 5, 8, 9, 17, 20, 23, 38 |
5 | Bowen disease | 16, 18, 31, 32, 34 |
6 | Epidermodysplasia verruciform | 5, 8, 9, 12, 14, 15, 17, 19–25, 36–38, 46, 47, 49, 50 |
An icosahedral capsid contains the HPV genome and is divided into three regions – the early (E) region, late (L) region and the Long Control Region (LCR). The early (E) region has different types of precursor proteins E1, E2, E4, E5, E6, and E7, which are essential in the early stages of infection and DNA replication. Among these, E6 and E7 have the major role in regulating the pathogenicity of the virus. The major and minor viral capsid structure is coded by the late (L) region proteins with two parts, L1 and L2. Viral replication and transcription are controlled by a non-coding region, the Long Control Region (LCR).
Proteins and specific functions
E1 Regulate viral DNA replication
E2 Regulatory factors of viral transcription
E4 Promote virus maturation and release
E5 Regulate growth factor signaling pathway
E6 Promotes the degradation of P53 and increases resistance to apoptosis
E7 Promotes retinoblastoma protein (pRb) degradation, affects the cell cycle and stimulates cell proliferation
L1 Major capsid protein is important for virus assembly and stability
L2 Secondary capsid protein is important for virus infection
Persistent HPV infections can lead to precancerous squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) or cervical intraepithelial lesions (CIN). SIL is further graded as LSIL / HSIL and CIN is further graded as CIN 1, CIN 2, and CIN 3. (VIDE Figures 2 and 3).
Microabrasions and hair follicles serve as entry points for the viral particles to invade the basal keratinocytes. HR HPV can directly invade the squamocolumnar junction of the cervix making it a prime target site for infection. Another similar direct breach of the epithelial lining is found to occur in the tonsillar crypts. E6 and E7 oncoproteins defy the cellular aging process and boost impromptu cell growth [5, 6, 7]. HPV mediated cellular transformation requires high expression of oncoproteins E6 and E7. This enhanced expression is favored by the loss of E2 repressive functions (VIDE Figure 4).
The pathogenesis of Human Papilloma Virus can lead to serious health consequences. Through vaccination, early detection, and targeted treatment, we can significantly reduce the disease burden of HPV-associated illnesses. Unraveling the mysteries of HPV pathogenesis equips us to break the cycle of infection and create a future free from its shadow.
4. History of vaccine development
The notoriety of HPV to cause malignancies has led to aggressive multi-modal therapies. This includes primary surgery coupled with radiation and chemotherapy. The consequences of these treatment methods are highly toxic with most patients experiencing adverse effects like xerostomia, dysphagia, and in the long run become dependent on gastrostomy tubes thus markedly compromising the quality of life [8, 9]. This led to the search for better and alternative methods of treatment. Experimental therapy for patients with HPV mediated malignancies led to the development of vaccines to combat HPV infections. It led to the development of vaccines which can be grouped as prophylactic vaccines and therapeutic vaccines. Vaccination curbs HPV infections proving beneficial for the vaccinated person as well their future sex partners by preventing the spread of transmission along with other barrier methods of protection (VIDE Table 2).
Vaccine | Country | Institution/Manufacturing company |
---|---|---|
Gardasil | United States of America | Merck and Co |
Cervarix | United Kingdom | GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) |
Gardasil 9 | United States of America | Merck and Co |
Cecoline | China | Xiamen University and Xiamen Innovax Biotech Co Ltd |
Walrinvax | China | Walvax Biotechnology Co Ltd |
Cervavac | India | Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd. (SIIPL) |
4.1 Clinical trials
The timeline of medical research highlights the remarkable story of Henrietta Lacks, the Afro-American woman who succumbed to cervical cancer in 1951. Derived from her name, the HeLa cell line was born from her cervical samples, and these were the first established in-vitro immortal cancer cell line. This initiated advancements in medical research which included the development of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine. Most screening programs for cervical cancers utilize the detection of HPV as a primary screening tool thus complying with the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations.
All HPV vaccines were subjected to clinical trials before being introduced into the market. It was of paramount importance to determine the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of these vaccines. After determining the appropriate HPV vaccine endpoints at a WHO convention in 2003, a consensus was arrived at that ethical and time constraints could not allow for cervical cancer to be an appropriate trial endpoint, given that participants under follow-up during the trial period would receive treatment of any cervical precancerous lesions detected. To determine vaccine efficacy at reducing HPV infections and precancerous cervical lesions, Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) Grade 2 and above were included as study endpoints. Following licensure, many HPV vaccine trials were conducted [4, 8].
4.1.1 Clinical trials in young women
These were multinational Phase 3 efficacy trials that included thousands of women in the age group 15–26 years. It was conducted by the respective manufacturing companies.
4.1.2 Clinical trials in older women
HPV vaccine efficacy is known to have reduced efficacy with a decline in age in women with prior HPV infection. Gardasil and Cervarix have both undergone trials in such group of women. The FUTURE III trial evaluated the efficacy Gardasil in over 3800 women aged 24–45. Vaccine efficacy against vaccine type CIN1+ was 88.7% in HPV-naïve women and 30.9% in all women. Another double-blinded trial of the quadrivalent vaccine in Chinese women aged 20–45 found a high vaccine efficacy of 94%. The VIVIANE trial evaluated the bivalent Cervarix vaccine’s efficacy in women aged >25. Vaccine efficacy against combined endpoint of vaccine-type 6-month persistent infection and CIN1+ was 90.5% in the per protocol group and 86.5% in the total vaccinated cohort. Estimated vaccine efficacy against vaccine-type CIN2+ was high but insignificant due to low numbers. Though studies have validated the use of HPV vaccines in older women, the effectiveness of the vaccine in this group is lesser than in adolescents [4, 8].
4.1.3 HPV vaccine with previous known infection
HPV based cervical screening has gained prominence in many countries and this helps to detect the early if women have had a previous HPV infection. Therefore, it is important to determine the efficacy of HPV vaccine in this group. Most of the HPV vaccine clinical trials recruited individuals who were HPV DNA or HPV antibody seropositive in the totally vaccinated cohort group. The findings in this trial support the use of the vaccine in HPV-DNA-negative women, irrespective of their serostatus [4, 8].
4.1.4 HPV vaccine in HIV infection
A few studies that have investigated the safety and efficacy of HPV vaccines among HIV patients have shown seroconversion rates of 100% post vaccination with no adverse outcomes. But further investigative and HPV vaccine efficacy data are deficient in this population and needs further assessment [4, 8].
4.1.5 HPV vaccinations in men
HPV is known to have a causal relationship with anogenital and oropharyngeal diseases. 90% of anal cancers, 70% of oropharyngeal cancers and 48% of penile cancers have been associated with HPV. Hence, in males, HPV vaccines have the potential to reduce HPV associated lesions and infections. A prelicensure randomized controlled trial with Gardasil in 4000 men aged 16–26 years found it to have an efficacy of 90.4% against vaccine type anogenital lesions and 85.6% against persistent vaccine type HPV infections. The results of the trial showed vaccine efficacy of 89.9% in vaccine type genital warts and 90.8% in external genital lesions, in the HPV naïve group. The vaccine efficacy against vaccine-type external genital lesions was 66.7%, in the intention-to-treat group [8]. However, the Gardasil 9 vaccine did not undergo prelicensure clinical trials in men. Instead, immunogenicity studies were done which showed that the Gardasil 9 vaccine elicited immune responses like Gardasil vaccine against the HPV subtypes 6,11,16, and 18. Hence Gardasil 9 has been approved for use in men [8].
4.1.6 Cross-protection against nonvaccine HPV subtypes
The FUTURE I and II trials of Gardasil analyzed the cross-protection against ten other HPV subtypes like 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58 and 59. These showed some degree of cross-protection against HPV infection and low-grade CIN, which was most marked against HPV-31, but not against high-grade CIN. A high vaccine efficacy was noted against infection and CIN2+ associated with HPV 31, HPV 33 (both subtypes closely related to HPV 16), HPV 45 (closely related to HPV 18) and HPV 51. Assessment of Cervarix through the PATRICIA and Costa Rica trials also revealed the effects of the bivalent vaccine against nonvaccine-type persistent infection and CIN2+. In women who were HPV naïve at the baseline, the vaccine was demonstrated to have the highest efficacy. Cross-protective effects lasting at least 11 years were indicated in the long-term follow up data from Cervarix [8].
4.2 Ethical misconduct
The history of HPV vaccine trials in India brought home some bitter truths in the ethical conduct of clinical trials. The past has been a witness to various atrocities and unethical research conducted against certain sections of society. The Tuskegee syphilis trial is the most prominent among them that violated the rights of participants. It led to the establishment of various guidelines for the conduct of ethical research. Despite stringent guidelines being enforced, ethical misconduct continued. In India, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare recommended legal action against a prominent Non-Government Organization (NGO) that was accused of violating ethical standards and national law during a study that was conducted to assess the possibility of initiating a nationwide cervical cancer vaccination program in India. A public interest litigation into the irregularities of the HPV vaccine trial in India, laid bare the opportunities for misconduct. Addressed as the field test of two HPV vaccines, seven vaccinated children died. The trial was then halted by the Indian government in March 2010. The trial failed to follow proper procedures, adequately monitor related events, and obtain informed consent from all participants as many of them were illiterate. It argued that the study should have fallen under the clinical trials legislation despite being projected as a demonstration project. The inquiry that concluded in 2011, reported that the deaths were unrelated to the vaccination and no ethical norms were violated [10]. For the first time ever, the judiciary put a clamp closure on all clinical trials occurring in the country at that moment. This unprecedented move brought forth streamlined clinical trials guided by mitigatory guidelines. The famous “Gatekeeper Permission” strategy tool over the routine “Consent from authorities” mode. Audio visual consent process gained prominence since then. Regrettably the lucrative clinical trial hub shifted from South Asia to East Asia.
5. Vaccines currently in use
The Human Papilloma Virus vaccine was first developed by Professors Ian Frazer and Jian Zhou at the University of Queensland in Australia. They synthesized “virus-like particles” (VLPs), containing proteins like those from the outer layer of the HPV, in 1990. After 7 years, the first human trials for Gardasil, the first HPV vaccine was completed. This was followed by approval for Cervarix – a bivalent vaccine and Gardasil 9 – a nonavalent vaccine. Only HPV prophylactic vaccines have received approval for use. Considering the role of early proteins E6 and E7 in the pathogenesis of cancerous and precancerous lesions associated with HPV, therapeutic vaccines are under clinical research and development. There are various molecules under phase II and phase III trials. (VIDE Figure 5).
5.1 Types of vaccines
HPV vaccines were developed with the chief aim to address prophylactic and therapeutic needs. Prophylactic vaccines were developed to be used in those patients who are expected to be exposed to the virus but have not yet contracted the infection, while therapeutic vaccines were needed to avert further development of the disease or the need for other invasive therapies. The evolution of preventive vaccines began with the discovery of VLPs and their enhanced immune capabilities.
The licensed HPV vaccines in use were developed based on a virus-like particle (VLP) of the major papillomavirus capsid protein L1. The VLPs are merely proteins, with no viral genome. This gives them the edge of being non-infectious and non-oncogenic, making them safer than HPV-attenuated vaccines. The virus-like particles can be produced in bacteria, yeast, or insect cells. Cervarix comprises HPV16 and 18 VLPs, monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL), and aluminum hydroxide as an adjuvant. Monophosphoryl lipid A is a toll/like receptor 4 (TLR4) agonist which has potency to induce high levels of antibodies [2, 8, 11]. Gardasil contains VLPs against HPV6, 11, 16, and 18, while Gardasil 9 contains VLPs against HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58. Cervarix – a bivalent vaccine that prevents HPV16 and 18. Cervavac is a recombinant quadrivalent vaccine (HPV 6, 11, 16, 18) developed by the Serum Institute of India, Pune [10] (VIDE Table 3).
Vaccine | Date of approval | Description and features |
---|---|---|
Gardasil* | June 8, 2006 |
|
Cervarix* | October 16, 2009 |
|
Gardasil 9 | December 10, 2014 |
|
5.2 Walrinvax
It is a recombinant bivalent HPV vaccine developed by Shanghai Zerun Biotechnology, a subsidiary of Walvax Biotechnology. It targets the more virulent HPV 16 and 18 and was licensed by the WHO in 2022. The adjuvant used is aluminum phosphate and the expression system is yeast [4]. The most common adverse reactions were vaccine related like erythema, swelling and induration at the injection site. The systemic adverse reactions included headache, myalgia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Rare instances of hypoesthesia and paresthesia were also reported (<0.1%).
5.3 Safety and efficacy of prophylactic vaccines
HPV vaccine demonstrates a high degree of immunogenicity, with nearly 98% of the vaccine recipients eliciting evidence of developing antibody response. Previous infection with one HPV type did nor lower the efficacy of the prophylactic vaccine against other HPV types [12] (VIDE Table 4).
Vaccine | Adverse effects |
---|---|
Cervarix | Injection site reactions like pain and swelling. Headache, fatigue Fever, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, dizziness, myalgia |
Gardasil | Injection site reactions like pain, swelling and erythema. Headache |
Gardasil 9 | Injection site reactions like pain, swelling and erythema. Headache Muscle and joint pain |
As a precaution the HPV vaccines are deferred until symptom improvement in moderate or severe acute illnesses. The quadrivalent and nonavalent HPV vaccines are produced using the yeast medium. This could pose a potential threat to individuals with a history of immediate hypersensitivity to yeast. These vaccines are contraindicated in such individuals. The bivalent Cervarix vaccine was contraindicated in individuals with latex allergy as the prefilled Cervarix syringes contained latex in the cap tip [2, 8, 11].
Cervavac also exhibits similar adverse effects like other HPV vaccines. Hypersensitivity including reactions to the yeast component of the vaccine is a contraindication. It should be administered with extreme caution in patients with history of thrombocytopenia or any coagulation disorder as the intramuscular administration of this vaccine may cause bleeding [10, 12].
5.4 Dosing schedule and regimens of prophylactic vaccines
Prophylactic HPV vaccines are initiated from minimum 9 years of age in both genders and is not licensed for adults over 45 years of age. The vaccines are administered either as a two dose or three dose regimens. The two-dose regimen is recommended for persons in the age group 9–14 years. The three-dose regimen is for any individual who is immunocompromised or falls in the age group 15–45 years [2, 3, 4, 8] (VIDE Table 5).
Age | Regimen | Schedule |
---|---|---|
9–14 years | 2-dose | 0, 6 to 12 months |
3-dose | 0, 2, 6 months | |
15–45 years | 3-dose | 0, 2, 6 months |
Cervavac has been approved for use in girls and women from 9 through 26 years of age [10].
Each dose is 0.5-mL administered intramuscularly.
5.5 Alternative single dose schedule
In view of the decline in the first dose of HPV vaccination coverage from 25–15% between 2019 and 2021, the WHO’s independent expert advisory group, SAGE (Strategic Advisory Group of Experts) came up with an alternative single dose regimen (VIDE Figure 6). It was suggested as an off-label option to be used in girls and boys aged 9–20 years. Compared to the routine dosing schedule, this single dose schedule is deemed to offer better compliance and improved coverage. Single dose schedule is not recommended in immunocompromised individuals [4].
One dose efficacy with Cervavac has not yet been established [10].
5.6 Considerations in special populations
HPV vaccines are not advocated for use during pregnancy. However, this does not call for any immediate intervention in case a dose has been administered during pregnancy. Vaccination should be delayed until after delivery if not initiated before pregnancy. HPV can be given to breastfeeding women aged 26 years and younger and not previously vaccinated. Presence of immunosuppression is not a contraindication for HPV vaccination. In children with history of sexual assault the earliest administration of HPV vaccine is recommended. Healthcare professionals should promote shared clinical decision making in women aged 27–45 years, if previously unvaccinated [2, 8].
5.7 Prophylactic HPV vaccines: Current updates
The prophylactic vaccines that have been licensed for use so far are either bivalent, quadrivalent, or nonavalent. To encompass more HPV strains, further research was aimed to target a single HPV variant. Efforts were also directed to target two, eight, and eleven variants of HPV. Most of these newer prophylactic vaccines are in their phase 2 or phase 3 clinical trials [2].
6. Vaccines in the pipeline
6.1 Therapeutic HPV vaccines
Currently, therapeutic vaccines for HPV are still in the different phases of clinical trials. Most of them are still in phase 1 and phase 2 trials. Therapeutic vaccines target the early proteins E6 and E7 which play an important role in the pathogenesis of the HPV [13].
Therapeutic HPV vaccines have categorized as nuclei acid vaccines, protein and polypeptide vaccines, dendritic cell vaccines, and recombinant vector vaccines (VIDE Table 6).
S. No | Type of vaccine | Platform | Antigen |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Live vector-based vaccines | Bacterial vector-based vaccine | HPV16 E7 |
HPV16/18 E6/E7 | |||
Viral vector-based vaccine | HPV16 E6/E7 | ||
HPV16/18 E6/E7 | |||
2. | Peptide and Protein-based vaccines | Synthetic long peptides and Specific epitope (short) peptides | HPV16 E7 |
HPV16 L2/E6/E7 | |||
HPV16/18 E7 | |||
HPV16 E6 | |||
3. | Nucleic acid-based vaccines | DNA vaccines | HPV16/18 E6/E7 |
HPV16 E7 | |||
HPV16 L2/E6/E7 | |||
mRNA vaccines (liposome-based vaccine) | HPV16 E6/E7 | ||
HPV16 E7 | |||
4. | Whole-cell vaccines | Dendritic cells | HPV16/18 E6/E7 |
The therapeutic HPV vaccines discussed above are in phases 1 and 2 of clinical trials. There are few limitations and drawbacks that have hampered the progress of therapeutic HPV vaccines. In the case of live vector-based vaccines, there is a possibility that the body’s immune response to the vector is stronger than the immune response to the antigen. Although protein and peptide vaccines are deemed to be safe and stable, their poor immunogenicity might hinder their efficacy. Though DNA vaccines project an effective antigen specific immunotherapy, insufficient immunogenicity remains a disadvantage. mRNA vaccine development in general, are slow because of their poor stability and low delivery efficiency [13, 14]. To combat this, liposomal preparations of RNA lipid complexes with antigen HPV 16, E7 was introduced. mRNA vaccine research has shown a bright future with the advent of mRNA covid vaccines. Failure to extract good quality dendritic cells for vaccine development, whole cell vaccine development has faced a crisis. Hence newer adjuvants, potential antigen targets are further being investigated [2].
7. Conclusion
The HPV vaccination program has markedly transformed the health status of women globally. It has helped in decreasing HPV infections and associated cancers. The hesitancy of individuals to opt for HPV vaccinations remains a hurdle in achieving the WHO goal of global cervical cancer elimination by 2030. The impact of HPV vaccination in males has been overlooked and one of the prime reasons cited is the lack of physician recommendation on it [14]. A systematic review published from Portugal in June 2023, has thrown light on the agonizing truth that only 4% of men worldwide were fully vaccinated against HPV as of 2019. Literatures imply evidence of HPV vaccine efficacy in men up to 26 years of age. Keeping increased vaccination coverage as a public health priority, the FASTER Strategy protocol was put forth to bridge the disconnect between HPV screening and vaccination and hasten reduction in HPV related infections and cervical cancer mortality [15]. Considering the role of early proteins other than E6 and E7 in the development of HPV related cancers, further exploration to encompass other antigens will widen the horizon to successfully generate more effective therapeutic vaccines.
References
- 1.
Longworth MS, Laimins LA. Pathogenesis of human papillomaviruses in differentiating epithelia. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2004; 68 (2):362-372. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.68.2.362-372.2004 - 2.
Mo Y, Ma J, Zhang H, Shen J, Chen J, Hong J, et al. Prophylactic and therapeutic HPV vaccines: Current scenario and perspectives. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2022; 12 :909223. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.909223 - 3.
Singh D, Vignat J, Lorenzoni V, Eslahi M, Ginsburg O, Lauby-Secretan B, et al. Global estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2020: A baseline analysis of the WHO Global Cervical Cancer elimination initiative. The Lancet Globalization and Health. 2023; 11 (2). DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00501-0 - 4.
CDC. Human papillomavirus vaccination for adults: Updated recommendations of the advisory Committee on immunization practices. MMWR. 2019; 68 (32):698-702 - 5.
Spayne J, Hesketh T. Estimate of global human papillomavirus vaccination coverage: Analysis of country-level indicators. BMJ Open. 2021; 11 (9):e052016. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052016 - 6.
Gheit T. Mucosal and cutaneous human papillomavirus infections and cancer biology. Frontiers in Oncology. 2019; 9 :355. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00355 - 7.
Soheili M, Keyvani H, Soheili M, Nasseri S. Human papilloma virus: A review study of epidemiology, carcinogenesis, diagnostic methods, and treatment of all HPV-related cancers. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2021; 35 :65. DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.35.65 - 8.
Illah O, Olaitan A. Updates on HPV Vaccination. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13 (2):243. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13020243 - 9.
Sharma H, Parekh S, Pujari P, Shewale S, Desai S, Bhatla N, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a new quadrivalent HPV vaccine in girls and boys aged 9-14 years versus an established quadrivalent HPV vaccine in women aged 15-26 years in India: A randomised, active-controlled, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2023; 24 (12):1321-1333. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00480-1 - 10.
Das M. Cervical cancer vaccine controversy in India. The Lancet Oncology. 2018; 19 (2):e84. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30018-4 - 11.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Adolescent Health Care, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Immunization, Infectious Disease, and Public Health Preparedness Expert Work Group. Human papillomavirus vaccination: ACOG Committee opinion, number 809. Obstetrics and Gynecology. Aug 2020; 136 (2):e15-e21. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004000. PMID: 32732766 - 12.
Bogani G, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Signorelli M, Martinelli F, Ditto A, Sabatucci I, et al. The role of human papillomavirus vaccines in cervical cancer: Prevention and treatment. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2018; 122 :92-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.12.017 - 13.
Bhattacharjee R, Das SS, Biswal SS, Nath A, Das D, Basu A, et al. Mechanistic role of HPV-associated early proteins in cervical cancer: Molecular pathways and targeted therapeutic strategies. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2022; 174 :103675. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103675 - 14.
Sabeena S, Bhat PV, Kamath V, Arunkumar G. Global human papilloma virus vaccine implementation: An update. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2018; 44 (6):989-997. DOI: 10.1111/jog.13634 - 15.
Bosch F, Robles C, Díaz M, et al. HPV-FASTER: Broadening the scope for prevention of HPV-related cancer. Nature Reviews. Clinical Oncology. 2016; 13 :119-132. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.146