Open access peer-reviewed chapter
Perception of administrators on e-learning platforms.
Abstract
The abstract provides insights into the paradigm shift occurring in health education due to the integration of e-learning platforms. It guides readers through the evolving environment of health education, highlighting the revolutionary power of digital tools such as virtual reality (VR), simulations, massive open online courses (MOOCs), and adaptive learning technologies. Educators see these platforms as critical for promoting interactive and collaborative learning experiences, as well as increasing student engagement and knowledge of health-related subjects. Students acknowledge the flexibility and interactivity offered by e-learning platforms, which contribute to their positive engagement and understanding of course content. The chapter explores the challenges and opportunities associated with transitioning to e-learning in health education, highlighting strategies for optimizing the learning experience. Recommendations include further investment in e-learning platforms, additional training for educators, and ongoing support to address challenges. The abstract underscores the significance of e-learning in revolutionizing health education by fostering a dynamic and responsive educational environment conducive to student success. Further research is encouraged to explore emerging trends and innovations in e-learning platforms, driving continuous improvement in health education delivery.
Keywords
- global collaboration
- technology integration
- innovative pedagogies
- e-learning
- health education
1. Introduction
As the educational sphere undergoes a radical transformation, health education emerges as a leading force in this era of digital innovation [1]. Moving beyond the traditional confines of chalkboards and lecture halls, a new chapter unfolds, marked by the integration of e-learning platforms that are redefining the very fabric of learning [2]. This chapter takes on an enlightening journey through the changing landscape of health education, guided by the digital threads that are intricately rewoven to enhance the way knowledge is shared and absorbed in the health education sector [3]. The latest literature presents a powerful narrative that this shift is not just a change in method but a fundamental reimagining of how health knowledge is communicated and consumed, revealing a rebirth in health education propelled by the advent of e-learning [4].
E-learning platforms encompass digital platforms that enable online education, providing a range of resources, interactive content, and collaboration capabilities. Illustrative examples comprise Virtual Reality (VR), Simulations, Interactive Modules, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), Adaptive Learning Technologies, Multimedia Resources, Real-time Collaboration Tools, and Gamification Elements [1]. Educators face challenges and opportunities when transitioning from traditional teaching methods to e-learning platforms in health education [5]. They perceive the role of e-learning platforms in fostering interactive and collaborative learning experiences for health students as crucial for their development [6]. Strategies that educators find most effective in maintaining student engagement and participation in online health education courses include interactive multimedia materials and adaptive learning technology [7]. Students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of e-learning platforms compared to traditional methods for health education vary, but many recognize the flexibility and interactivity offered by e-learning platforms [8]. Factors that influence students’ engagement and motivation when utilizing e-learning platforms for health education include the design of the platform, the availability of interactive resources, and the level of instructor support [9]. Students believe that e-learning platforms enhance their understanding and retention of health-related concepts compared to traditional classroom settings, thanks to the interactive and adaptive nature of the platforms [10].
The impact of this shift goes beyond the means of delivering education; it transforms the core principles of teaching and learning. This invites us to challenge the traditional top-down approach to education and adopt a more collaborative, interactive style [11]. With the flexibility of e-learning platforms, health educators can design educational experiences that meet the diverse needs of today’s learners, without sacrificing the depth of their content [12]. “The Dynamic Shift of E-Learning Platforms” aims to explore the transformative journey of health education, focusing on the shift from traditional methods to the current e-learning platform-dominated landscape. It investigates how digital tools like multimedia materials and adaptive learning technology have revolutionized pedagogical approaches in the health education field. It emphasizes the democratizing effect of e-learning that provides flexible and interactive learning experiences, transcending geographical barriers and fostering global collaboration in health education [13].
With a curious mind, this chapter draws from a rich body of research that highlights the importance of this evolution in learning [5]. Imagine a learning environment unbound by geography, where the traditional classroom expands into a virtual space of endless interaction and collaboration [12]. Here, the barriers to traditional education dissolve, making way for a global dialog of ideas [5]. This realm allows for real-time, cross-continental exchanges between students and educators, fostering a collaborative approach to tackling complex health issues [8]. This wave of change brings forth critical questions for administrators, educators, and students: How do administrators perceive the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and alignment with institutional goals of e-learning platforms in health education? How do educators evaluate the functionality of e-learning platforms, engaging students, and utilizing interactive elements in delivering health education content? In terms of factors such as accessibility, engagement, and understanding of course content, how satisfied are health education students with the usability of e-learning platforms?
1.1 E-learning revolution in health education
The evolution of e-learning in health education traces its roots to the 1960s computer-assisted instruction (CAI), marking the dawn of interactive, technology-driven learning [9]. Advancements in personal computing during the 1980s laid the groundwork for the integration of technology in education, with interactive tutorials and CD-ROMs paving the way for self-directed learning [14]. The 1990s brought the Internet and with it, a global classroom without borders, enabling collaborative and interactive learning [15].
Despite these advancements, the integration of e-learning in health education was met with skepticism. Traditionalists questioned the efficacy of digital learning, citing concerns over the loss of the human touch that is so integral to healthcare and education [16, 17]. There was also apprehension about the ability of e-learning platforms to simulate the hands-on experience required for training. Overcoming these barriers required demonstrating the effectiveness of e-learning through evidence-based outcomes. Studies began to show that digital learning methods could be as effective as, if not more than, traditional classroom instruction [16]. The flexibility of e-learning allowed for a more learner-centered approach, accommodating various learning styles and schedules [1]. Moreover, advancements in multimedia, simulation technology, and interactive design improved the quality of e-learning content, making it more engaging and relevant to health education [18]. Pedagogical innovations further propelled the acceptance of e-learning in health education. The development of virtual patients, for instance, provided learners with realistic scenarios, allowing them to apply theoretical knowledge in a safe and controlled environment [16]. Gamification elements were introduced to increase student motivation and engagement by incorporating game-like features into learning activities [18].
As the efficacy of e-learning was established, resistance began to wane. The digital learning landscape continued to evolve, with the introduction of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and blended learning models that combined online and face-to-face instruction [9]. Today, sophisticated e-learning platforms offer a wealth of resources, including high-definition video lectures, interactive modules, and real-time collaboration tools, which have become integral to health education across the globe [14]. The advent of e-learning in health education has been marked by a shift from skepticism to widespread acceptance, driven by technological innovation and pedagogical advancements [19]. This period saw a melding of increased computing power and a learner-centered pedagogical shift, leading to the rich, multimedia-enriched e-learning landscape in health education we see today [19]. The adoption of e-learning in schools and institutions has been transformative, with online modules complementing traditional teaching and simulations becoming a staple in teaching and learning [18]. The 2010s marked the rise of specialized e-learning platforms, MOOCs, and the advent of mobile learning, further democratizing education and allowing learners to access material on the go [9]. The current state of health education is characterized by a significant shift toward e-learning, a movement that is reshaping the educational experiences of students, educators, and institutions [19]. Over 80% of health-focused schools in the United States now blend digital learning with traditional methods [20]. Platforms such as Khan Academy and Coursera exemplify the global acceptance of e-learning, offering a wealth of high-quality health education content [21]. Educators benefit from the ability to customize learning experiences and provide instant feedback, while institutions leverage e-learning to extend their reach and enhance educational outcomes [21].
Despite challenges like the digital divide, the commitment to e-learning in health education remains strong, ensuring that knowledge is accessible to all, regardless of geographical or socio-economic constraints [22]. The journey from basic computer-assisted instruction to today’s sophisticated platforms has revolutionized the way health education is delivered, making it more accessible, flexible, and effective [22]. As the body of evidence supporting e-learning continues to grow, it is poised to play an even more significant role in the education of healthcare professionals [23].
1.2 Current landscape of health education
The present landscape of health education is experiencing a significant transformation with the emergence of e-learning as a central force reshaping traditional educational paradigms [23]. This shift is backed by the latest statistics and real-world examples that highlight the pervasive impact of e-learning platforms on students, educators, and health education institutions [22, 23]. For students in health education, the influence of e-learning is undeniable [19]. Platforms like Khan Academy and Coursera provide learners with unprecedented access to high-quality content, enabling them to customize their educational journeys according to their schedules and preferences [13]. From the perspective of educators in health education, e-learning platforms offer a range of advantages [19]. These platforms allow for the customization of content to cater to diverse learning styles, provide instantaneous feedback, and facilitate collaborative learning experiences [19, 20]. The asynchronous nature of e-learning accommodates the varied schedules of both students and instructors, creating a flexible yet rigorous learning environment [7]. Additionally, the integration of virtual patient simulations, augmented reality applications, and interactive case studies into curricula enhances the pedagogical toolkit, enabling educators to engage students in innovative and impactful ways [8].
The prevalence of e-learning in health education goes beyond being a mere trend; it is a strategic choice for institutions aiming to broaden access and enhance educational outcomes [9]. While challenges such as the digital divide and the need for a balance between technology and human interaction are acknowledged, institutions are embracing virtual laboratories, multimedia resources, and collaborative online spaces to nurture the next generation of health educators and professionals [10]. This commitment to innovation, accessibility, and adaptability positions e-learning as a cornerstone in the evolution of health education [11]. Mason et al. further stated that the e-learning revolution in health education is not an abstract concept but a dynamic force that is actively shaping the experiences of students, teachers, and institutions. As educators shape the minds of future health professionals and students navigate the digital corridors of knowledge, the landscape of health education undergoes a tangible and impactful metamorphosis in real time.
1.3 The dual facets of e-learning in health education
The integration of e-learning into health education has a dual impact, offering a wealth of benefits while presenting distinct challenges that must be addressed. E-learning platforms revolutionize student engagement through interactive modules, multimedia, and virtual simulations that make learning captivating [24]. Widespread Accessibility made e-learning democratize education by providing access to high-quality content across the globe, eliminating geographical barriers and making health education a universal right [20]. On the other hand, personalized learning experiences can be tailored to individual learning styles and paces, thanks to adaptive technologies that customize content to meet every learner’s needs [25]. Flexibility and convenience with the asynchronous nature of e-learning accommodate varying schedules, allowing learners to access material at their convenience, which is especially beneficial for those balancing education with practice or research [26]. Furthermore, global collaboration breaks down borders, enabling collaboration between administrators, educators and students from different cultures and health education institutions, enriching the learning experience with a diversity of perspectives.
The challenges of e-learning in health education cannot be swept under, rather, it will enhance the preparedness of all stakeholders to avoid unseen situations [27]. Bridging the digital divide of the disparity in access to technology and the Internet remains a significant hurdle [26]. Chergui et al. further stated that the strategies to overcome this include providing technology access, subsidizing Internet costs, or offering offline learning options. Maintaining human Interaction is another: balancing technological use with the need for interpersonal interaction is crucial [24], hybrid models that combine online learning with face-to-face elements can help maintain the essential human aspect of education [25], ensuring quality and consistency by maintaining high standards and uniformity across educational content is challenging. Institutions must collaborate with accrediting bodies and establish rigorous quality assurance protocols [28]. Navigating technological advances in keeping pace with continuous technological innovation requires ongoing educator and student training to fully leverage e-learning’s capabilities.
1.4 Strategies to address e-learning challenges
Implementing comprehensive digital literacy programs to ensure educators and students can effectively use e-learning tools, and promoting efficient navigation, virtual collaboration, and problem-solving are critical strategies to comb the challenges mentioned above. Combining online and in-person learning helps preserve the benefits of direct interaction and mentorship while utilizing the advantages of digital platforms [1, 18]. Prioritizing infrastructure investment is key to overcoming the digital divide, which may include initiatives to provide technology and Internet access to all students [27]. Establishing clear guidelines and quality assurance measures, in collaboration with accrediting bodies, upholds the integrity and standardization of e-learning content [20]. In navigating e-learning’s dual aspects in health education, institutions are pivotal in creating an environment that maximizes the potential of digital education [21]. By adopting forward-thinking strategies and addressing the challenges head-on, the field of health education can continue to progress, equipping learners with the necessary knowledge and skills for the complexities of the modern healthcare landscape [22].
1.5 Innovative pedagogies in digital health education
Integrating e-learning into health education has led to innovative pedagogies that have reshaped the landscape of medical teaching and learning. These pedagogical advancements have been instrumental in enhancing the educational experience for health professionals at all stages of their careers [27]. Among the most significant innovations are interactive modules, simulation-based learning, and gamification, each contributing uniquely to the field. Interactive modules have emerged as a cornerstone of digital health education, providing an engaging and dynamic learning environment. These modules allow learners to interact with the content actively, promoting deeper understanding and retention of information [25]. Interactive case studies enable learners to apply theoretical knowledge to real-world scenarios, fostering critical thinking and problem-solving skills [26]. The use of this multimedia, including videos and animations, further enriches the learning experience, catering to various learning styles and preferences.
Simulation-based learning represents another pedagogical breakthrough, offering a virtual platform for clinical practice without the risks associated with real-life patient care. High-fidelity simulations mimic clinical environments and patient interactions, providing a safe space for learners to practice procedures, make decisions, and experience the consequences of their actions in a controlled setting [25]. This form of learning has proven particularly beneficial in areas such as surgery, emergency medicine, and nursing education, where procedural skills are paramount. Gamification, the application of game-design elements in learning environments, has been adopted to increase motivation and engagement among health education learners. By incorporating elements such as points, badges, leaderboards, and challenges, gamification transforms learning into a more interactive and enjoyable experience [20]. It not only motivates learners to engage with the material but also encourages competition and collaboration, leading to improved educational outcomes.
These innovative pedagogies have been adapted to a wide range of health education contexts. In medical education, interactive modules and simulations have been used to teach anatomy, pathophysiology, and other skills [17]. In nursing education, they provide hands-on practice in patient care and emergency response. Public health initiatives have also benefited from these methods, using interactive e-learning platforms to train healthcare workers in disease surveillance, outbreak response, and health promotion [16].
1.6 Adaptive learning: personalization in health education
Adaptive learning represents a significant shift in educational methodology, particularly within health education, where the need for personalized learning experiences is paramount [11]. This approach utilizes technology to tailor educational content to the individual needs and learning paces of students [12]. At the heart of adaptive learning systems is artificial intelligence (AI), which analyzes a learner’s interactions and performance to provide customized resources and activities to address their specific learning gaps and strengths [13]. The use of AI in creating personalized learning paths is a response to the understanding that learners absorb and process information differently. By employing algorithms that adapt in real-time, AI-driven platforms can present content that challenges students just enough to keep them engaged without causing frustration. This balance is crucial in health education, where the mastery of complex concepts and procedures is essential [14]. An adaptive learning system might present a series of progressively challenging scenarios to student based on their demonstrated competency in diagnostic skills.
The impact of adaptive learning on health education outcomes has been significant as studies have shown that personalized learning environments can lead to greater retention of knowledge, higher levels of learner satisfaction, and improved clinical skills [14]. One such study found that medical students using adaptive e-learning platforms performed better in subsequent clinical assessments compared to those who did not use such systems [15]. These case studies further illustrate the effectiveness of adaptive learning in health education. The University of California, San Francisco, implemented an adaptive learning platform for its pharmacology course, resulting in a marked improvement in student exam scores [29]. Similarly, a nursing program that incorporated adaptive learning into its curriculum saw an increase in National Council Licensure Examination pass rates, suggesting that the personalized approach better-prepared students for the rigors of the exam [30].
The success of adaptive learning systems in health education can be attributed to their ability to provide immediate feedback, allowing students to understand and correct their mistakes in real time. Additionally, these systems can identify patterns in student learning behavior, enabling educators to intervene when necessary to provide additional support or resources [26]. To this effect, adaptive learning has revolutionized health education by providing personalized learning experiences that cater to the unique needs of each student. The integration of AI into these systems has not only enhanced the efficiency of learning but has also contributed to better educational outcomes [1]. As technology continues to advance, the potential for adaptive learning to further improve health education is vast and promising.
1.7 Global collaboration through e-learning platforms
The advent of e-learning has significantly transformed the landscape of professional development and continuing education, particularly in the health and health education sector. E-learning platforms have emerged as pivotal tools for global collaboration, enabling health professionals to partake in cross-border education and the exchange of best practices [25]. Such platforms have effectively created a virtual nexus for knowledge sharing, fostering international cooperation and driving the collective pursuit of enhancing healthcare delivery and outcomes [4]. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) stand at the forefront of this educational revolution [31]. These platforms like Coursera and edX offer a plethora of courses on diverse health topics, crafted by leading institutions worldwide. These courses range from foundational subjects in public health to advanced, specialized medical training. The accessibility and scalability of MOOCs have democratized education, allowing healthcare workers from various regions to access cutting-edge knowledge and training without the constraints of physical and financial barriers [26, 28, 31].
Virtual conferences and webinars represent another avenue where e-learning has catalyzed global collaboration [32]. These virtual gatherings enable real-time interaction among health professionals, facilitating the dissemination of innovative practices and fostering a sense of community despite physical distances. The COVID-19 pandemic has particularly underscored the value of virtual events, as they continue to sustain professional engagement and education amidst travel restrictions and social distancing measures [27]. Despite the promise of e-learning platforms in bridging international gaps, challenges such as the digital divide remain significant. Inequities in access to technology and Internet connectivity can hinder the participation of health professionals from resource-limited settings, potentially exacerbating existing disparities in health knowledge and practice [19]. Language barriers and varying medical standards across countries also pose challenges in harmonizing educational content and ensuring its global applicability.
Nevertheless, the success stories of global health education initiatives through e-learning platforms are noteworthy [15]. The WHO’s collaboration with various academic institutions to offer online courses on epidemic and pandemic response has attracted a global audience, promoting shared learning and collective response strategies [22]. Project ECHO is another exemplary initiative, utilizing tele-education to connect rural healthcare providers with specialists, thereby expanding the reach of medical expertise and mentorship [17]. E-learning platforms have undeniably enabled a level of international cooperation that was previously unattainable. They offer a myriad of opportunities for standardizing health education, sharing knowledge, and expediting medical advancements. As technology continues to evolve, the potential for enhanced global collaboration in health education through e-learning remains vast, promising a future where knowledge knows no borders [19].
1.8 The future of health education
The future of health education is poised for a transformative shift with the integration of emerging technologies such as virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and blockchain [33]. These technologies hold the potential to revolutionize the educational landscape, offering immersive, interactive experiences and secure, verifiable credentials that could significantly enhance the way health professionals learn and practice.
Virtual reality, with its ability to simulate complex medical procedures and environments, provides an unparalleled opportunity for immersive learning [4]. VR can transport medical students and professionals into operating rooms, emergency scenarios, or global health settings, offering hands-on experience without the associated risks or logistical challenges. VR can improve knowledge retention and procedural skills, which are critical in health education and patient care.
Augmented reality complements VR by overlaying digital information onto the physical world, enhancing the learner’s interaction with real-world environments.
AR applications can guide healthcare procedures in real time, display anatomical structures during training, and provide contextual information to support clinical decision-making. The potential for AR to support just-in-time learning and improve the accuracy of clinical interventions is significant.
Blockchain technology, known for its security and transparency, offers a promising solution to the challenges of credentialing and record-keeping in health education. By creating an immutable ledger of qualifications and continuing education credits, blockchain can streamline the verification process for medical credentials, reduce fraud, and facilitate the maintenance of professional standards.
While the potential benefits of these technologies are vast, their integration into health education also raises ethical considerations and challenges [31, 32, 33]. Privacy concerns, particularly related to the collection and use of sensitive data in VR and AR applications, must be addressed. Additionally, the risk of technology becoming a substitute for human interaction in medical training warrants careful consideration, as the development of empathy and communication skills is essential for patient care.
Furthermore, the cost and complexity of implementing these technologies may create barriers to access, potentially exacerbating existing disparities in health education [34]. Ensuring equitable access and developing strategies to integrate these technologies responsibly into curricula will be crucial. The integration of VR, AR, and blockchain technologies holds the promise of enhancing health education by providing more engaging, effective, and secure learning experiences [33]. However, the successful adoption of these technologies will require careful navigation of ethical considerations, challenges, and a commitment to equity to ensure that the future of health education remains inclusive and grounded in the best interests of both learners and patients.
Advertisement
2. Methodology
2.1 Research design
A survey research design was employed to investigate the perceptions and experiences of administrators, educators, and students concerning the integration of e-learning platforms in health education. This approach allowed for a comprehensive understanding of the subject. A purposive sampling approach was utilized to select administrators involved in health education programs. Educators were sampled through convenience sampling from health education departments. Simple random sampling was applied to select health education students from different levels within e-learning programs. Ethical approval was obtained, and informed consent was secured from all participants to ensure transparency and voluntary participation.
2.2 Data collection and data analysis
A structured survey questionnaire tailored to each participant category (Administrators, Educators, and Students) was employed to collect data. Administrators were queried about overall satisfaction, perceived challenges, and alignment with institutional goals. Educators answered questions about the functionality of the e-learning platform, effectiveness in student engagement, and utilization of interactive elements. Students responded to inquiries about satisfaction with usability, effectiveness in understanding course content, engagement with interactive elements, and frequency of interaction. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods of means and standard deviation.
2.3 Results
Table 1 illustrates administrators’ assessments of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and alignment with institutional goals of e-learning platforms in health education. The table displays a mean score of (x̅ = 17, SD = 4.84) for administrators’ perceptions of the e-learning platform’s effectiveness in health education. Administrators reported positive feedback from both students and educators, emphasizing the platform’s value in organizing and managing health education programs. Additionally, the e-learning platform was noted to support administrative processes related to health education program management. The table further indicates that administrators view the e-learning platform as cost-effective for delivering health content (x̅ = 3, SD = 0.74). Furthermore, administrators perceive the e-learning platform as contributing to the achievement of institutional goals and objectives (x̅ = 6.75, SD = 0.45). In summary, the results suggest that administrators overall consider e-learning platforms effective in delivering content, valuable in managing health education programs, and conducive to monitoring students’ performance.
| N | Mean | Std. deviation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived effectiveness of e-learning platform | 12 | 17.0000 | 4.84 |
| Perceived cost-effectiveness of e-learning platform | 12 | 3.0000 | 0.74 |
| Perceived institutional goal of e-learning platform | 12 | 6.7500 | 0.45 |
Table 1.
Table 2 presents an overview of educators’ assessments regarding the functionality of e-learning platforms, their effectiveness in engaging students, and the incorporation of interactive elements for delivering health education content. The table displays a mean score of (x̅ = 8.8, SD = 1.64) concerning educators’ perspectives on the functionality of e-learning platforms in health education. Educators emphasize the platforms’ effectiveness in the teaching-learning process, particularly in providing timely feedback to students. Furthermore, the table indicates educators’ acknowledgement of the utilization of interactive elements in health education (x̅ = 12.8, SD = 2.09). This recognition underscores the positive impact of incorporating interactive elements on student participation and comprehension. Virtual simulations, gamification, and interactive modules are identified as valuable features that enhance the learning experience, fostering active student engagement. Educators note that these elements facilitate dynamic and immersive learning, allowing them to assess student understanding and adapt teaching strategies accordingly. The table also reveals a mean score of (x̅ = 10.2, SD = 1.36) regarding educators’ engagement with e-learning platforms. This score suggests that e-learning platforms enable effective assessment through feedback mechanisms and the evaluation of student progress. Additionally, it provides insights into the diversity of individual responses, highlighting the adaptability of e-learning platforms to cater to various learning styles and contribute to a more inclusive educational environment in the context of health education delivery.
| N | Mean | Std. deviation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functionality of e-learning platforms | 20 | 8.8000 | 1.64157 |
| Utilization of interactive elements | 20 | 12.8000 | 2.09259 |
| Educators’ engagement with e-learning platforms | 20 | 10.2000 | 1.36111 |
Table 2.
Educators and e-learning platforms.
Table 3 provides insights into students’ perspectives on the usability, accessibility, engagement, and understanding of course content using e-learning platforms. The results indicate a high level of student satisfaction, as evidenced by a mean score of 10.1 and an SD of 1.59. Most students find e-learning platforms to be user-friendly and easily navigable. Additionally, the table reveals a mean score of (x̅ = 9.76, SD = 1.90) concerning students’ understanding of course content through e-learning platforms. Students highlight the effectiveness of these platforms in aiding their comprehension and retention of course materials. They appreciate the ample resources and materials provided, which support their learning needs and enable effective management of study schedules. Furthermore, students express positive engagement with the interactive elements of e-learning platforms in delivering health education content (x̅ = 5.8, SD = 1.35). This suggests a favorable perception of these interactive elements, with a significant number of respondents indicating a high level of engagement. Lastly, the table presents a mean score of (x̅ = 6.07, SD = 1.26) regarding students’ perceptions of accessibility to e-learning platforms. This result suggests that most students view e-learning platforms as effective tools that cater to their learning needs with a high level of accessibility.
| N | Mean | Std. deviation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Usability of e-learning platforms | 81 | 10.1358 | 1.58708 |
| Understanding course content on e-learning platforms | 81 | 9.7654 | 1.89916 |
| Engagement with interactive elements on e-learning platforms | 81 | 5.8395 | 1.34589 |
| Accessibility to e-learning platforms | 81 | 6.0741 | 1.26271 |
Table 3.
Students and e-learning platforms.
2.4 Discussion
Based on the study conducted by Shaukat [33] and Goodman et al. [34] that administrators perceived effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and alignment with the institutional goals of e-learning platforms in health education, the study revealed that administrators perceived e-learning platforms as effective in delivering accessible and quality education to students, showcasing their potential cost-effectiveness as alternatives to traditional classroom-based education, and demonstrating their adaptability to align with institutional goals and missions.
This chapter adds a significant contribution to the existing literature by exploring the transformative impact of e-learning platforms on the education sector, with a specific focus on their integration into health education. The advent of various e-learning platforms, encompassing digital tools, adaptive learning technologies, and multimedia resources, marks a revolutionary shift in pedagogical methodologies. This evolution not only redefines traditional teaching approaches but also underscores the substantial enhancements these platforms bring to student engagement and critical thinking within the realm of health education.
The results underscore administrators’ perspectives on the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and alignment with institutional objectives of e-learning platforms in the field of health education. This aligns with the findings of Shaukat [33], which emphasized the significance of e-learning platforms in enhancing educational outcomes. The positive feedback from students and educators resonates with the work of Ref. [19], who highlighted the importance of user satisfaction in determining the success of educational technology. The recognition of the e-learning platform’s cost-effectiveness is consistent with the cost-effectiveness arguments presented by Goodman et al. [34]. The acknowledgement of the platform’s contribution to institutional goals is supported by Kaul et al. [22], who stressed the need for educational technologies to align with institutional objectives.
Furthermore, one of the research questions investigates the contribution of educators to establishing the functionality of e-learning platforms. It also explores how educators engage their students on these platforms and utilize interactive elements in delivering health education content. Educators’ perspectives on the functionality of e-learning platforms resonate with the findings of Goodman et al. [34], emphasizing the effectiveness of these platforms in the teaching-learning process. The high score for the utilization of interactive elements aligns with the positive impact of such elements on engagement, as discussed by Yurchenko and Semenikhina [31]. The educators’ engagement with e-learning platforms is consistent with the adaptability of these platforms to various learning styles, as emphasized by Din [32].
Also, the high satisfaction score among students supports the user-friendly nature of e-learning platforms, in line with the findings of Serrano et al. [12]. The positive perception of the effectiveness of e-learning platforms in aiding understanding is consistent with the findings of Serrano et al. [12], emphasizing the role of e-learning in enhancing comprehension. Students’ positive engagement with interactive elements aligns with the work of Mdhlalose and Mlambo [14], highlighting the benefits of interactive features in improving student engagement. The perception of high accessibility is in line with the inclusivity and accessibility arguments presented by Ref. [19].
2.5 Conclusion and recommendation
In conclusion, this chapter sheds light on the transformative impact of e-learning platforms in the field of health education, emphasizing their integration and the subsequent revolution in pedagogical approaches. The advent of diverse e-learning tools, including adaptive learning technologies and multimedia resources, marks a paradigm shift that not only redefines traditional teaching methods but also significantly enhances student engagement and critical thinking within the context of health education. Based on the findings, it is recommended that institutions further invest in and promote the integration of e-learning platforms in health education. This could involve providing additional training for educators to enhance their proficiency in utilizing interactive elements effectively. Moreover, ongoing support and resources should be allocated to ensure the continuous improvement of e-learning tools, addressing any identified challenges. Additionally, a focus on user-friendly design and accessibility features will contribute to optimizing the learning experience for students. Further research is encouraged to explore evolving trends and innovations in e-learning platforms, fostering a dynamic and responsive educational environment in the continually advancing landscape of health education.
Advertisement
Acknowledgments
The authors express their gratitude to the Department of Human Kinetics and Health Education at the Faculty of Education, Ekiti State University, and the Academic Staff of the Department of Human Kinetics and Health Education, Bamidele Olumilua University of Education, Science, and Technology, Ikere-Ekiti for their valuable input in reviewing the manuscript. Special appreciation is extended to Dr. S.E. Ogunsile and Dr. V.O. Adeyele for their guidance on the Book Chapter.
Advertisement
A. Questionnaire
A.1 Revolutionizing health education: the dynamic shift of e-learning platforms
See Table A1.
| Response options | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Question | Very satisfied | Satisfied | Dissatisfied | Very dissatisfied |
| To what extent do agree with the overall effectiveness of the e-learning platform for health education? | ||||
| In terms of delivering health education, do you agree that the e-learning platform is a cost-effective solution? | ||||
| Regarding the e-learning platform, how often do you agree with receiving positive feedback from students and educators? | ||||
| To what degree do you agree that the e-learning platform is a valuable tool for managing and organizing health education programs? | ||||
| Were there any significant challenges or barriers to the successful implementation of the e-learning platform in health education? | ||||
| How well does the e-learning platform align with the strategic goals and objectives of the institution? | ||||
| In terms of monitoring student performance and program effectiveness, do you agree that the e-learning platform provides sufficient data and analytics? | ||||
| To what extent do you agree with the e-learning platform’s support for the administrative processes involved in managing health education programs? | ||||
| Did the e-learning platform meet the institution’s requirements for data security and privacy? | ||||
| Considering your experience, would you agree with recommending the e-learning platform to other institutions for health education? | ||||
| To what extent do you agree with the functionality of the e-learning platform for delivering course content? | ||||
| In terms of engaging students during the learning process, do agree that the e-learning platform is effective? | ||||
| How often do you agree with utilizing interactive elements on the e-learning platform for student engagement? | ||||
| To what degree do you agree that the e-learning platform is user-friendly and easy to navigate? | ||||
| Are the assessment and feedback mechanisms on the e-learning platform effective in evaluating student progress? | ||||
| How frequently do you agree with interacting with students through the e-learning platform? | ||||
| To what extent do agree that the e-learning platform is a valuable tool for delivering course materials and resources? | ||||
| Does the e-learning platform adequately support your ability to provide timely feedback to students? | ||||
| How well does the e-learning platform support your ability to monitor student progress and participation? | ||||
| Considering your experience, would you agree with recommending the e-learning platform to other educators? | ||||
| To what extent do you agree with the usability of the e-learning platform? | ||||
| In terms of helping you understand and retain course content, do you agree that the e-learning platform is effective? | ||||
| How often do agree with engaging with interactive elements on the e-learning platform? | ||||
| To what degree do you agree that the e-learning platform is accessible and accommodating to your learning needs? | ||||
| Are the assessment and feedback mechanisms on the e-learning platform helpful in gauging your progress? | ||||
| How frequently do you agree with interacting with peers and instructors through the e-learning platform? | ||||
| In terms of being engaging and interactive, do you agree with the e-learning platform? | ||||
| Does the e-learning platform provide sufficient resources and materials for your learning needs? | ||||
| How well does the e-learning platform support your ability to manage your study schedule? | ||||
| Considering your experience, would you agree with recommending the e-learning platform to other students? | ||||
Table A1.
Questionnaire on revolutionizing health education: the dynamic shift of e-learning platforms.
References
- 1.
Frenk J et al. Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. The Lancet. 2010; 376 (9756):1923-1958. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61854-5 - 2.
Frehywot S et al. E-learning in medical education in resource-constrained low- and middle-income countries. Human Resources for Health. 2013; 11 (1):1-15. DOI: 10.1186/1478-4491-11-4 - 3.
Burk-Rafel J, Heath J. New medical student performance evaluation standards: Laudable but inadequate. Academic Medicine. 2017; 92 (6):733. DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000001705 - 4.
Hilbert TS, Renkl A, Schworm S, Keßler S, Reiss K. Learning to teach with worked-out examples: A computer-based learning environment for teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2008; 24 (4):316-332. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00266.x - 5.
O’Sullivan S, Khraibi AA, Chen W, Corridon PR. Lessons learned transitioning from traditional premedical and medical education to E-learning platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic within the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development. 2021; 8 :238212052110258. DOI: 10.1177/23821205211025861 - 6.
Gil-García JR, Zhang J, Puron-Cid G. Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view. Government Information Quarterly. 2016; 33 (3):524-534. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.03.002 - 7.
Shah S et al. The technological impact of COVID-19 on the future of education and health care delivery. Pain Physician. 2020; 23 (4S):S367-S380. DOI: 10.36076/ppj.2020/23/s367 - 8.
Zainuddin Z, Halili SH. Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2016; 17 (3):313-340. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274 - 9.
Patil DU, AChandankhede S. E-learning in education. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology. 2022; 2 (2):32-35. DOI: 10.48175/ijarsct-7407 - 10.
Liaw S-S. Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education. 2008; 51 (2):864-873. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005 - 11.
Mason J, Shaw G, Zhang D. Shifting pedagogies and digital technologies: Shaping futures in education. In: Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education. Singapore: Springer; 2019. pp. 201-223. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-9439-3_12 - 12.
Serrano DR, Dea-Ayuela MA, González-Burgos E, Serrano-Gil A, Lalatsa A. Technology-enhanced learning in higher education: How to enhance student engagement through blended learning. European Journal of Education. 2019; 54 (2):273-286. DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12330 - 13.
Choudhury A, Biswas A, Chakraborti S. Digital learning-based education: Transcending physical barriers. Singapore: Springer. Information Quarterly. 2023; 33 (3):524. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-8967-4 - 14.
Mdhlalose D, Mlambo G. Integration of technology in education and its impact on learning and teaching. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies. 2023; 47 (2):54-63. DOI: 10.9734/ajess/2023/v47i21021 - 15.
Jaakkola H, Henno J, Mäkelä J. Computers in education. In: 46th MIPRO ICT Proceedings of the International Convention MIPRO. Opatija, Croatia: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2023. DOI: 10.23919/mipro57284.2023.10159980 - 16.
Sinha M, Agarwal V, Gupta L. Human touch in digital education—A solution. Clinical Rheumatology. 2020; 39 (12):3897-3898. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05448-y - 17.
Pokrovskaia NN, Leontyeva VL, Ababkova MY, D’Ascenzo F. Regulation of digital behavior models for knowledge transfer: Organizational concerns of remote learning. Education Sciences. 2021; 11 (10):592. DOI: 10.3390/educsci11100592 - 18.
Watsjold B, Cosimini M, Mui P, Chan TM. Much ado about gaming: An educator’s guide to serious games and gamification in medical education. AEM Education and Training. 2022; 6 (4):393-394. DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10794 - 19.
Kohstall F, Richter C, Dhouib S, Kastner F. Academia in Transformation: Scholars Facing the Arab Uprisings. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. 2018. DOI: 10.5771/9783845274348. Available from: https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/a11f6bcb-23ad-4706-ae69-595947da9619/external_content - 20.
Soulé H, Warrick T. Defining 21st century readiness for all students: What we know and how to get there. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2015; 9 (2):178-186. DOI: 10.1037/aca0000017 - 21.
Atkinson RC. Computer-assisted instruction. Science. 1968; 160 (3825):425-427 - 22.
Kaul V et al. Medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Chest. 2021; 159 (5):1949-1960. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.12.026 - 23.
Krejci L, Carter K, Gaudet T. Whole health. Medical Care. 2014; 52 (Supplement 5):S5-S8. DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000226 - 24.
Wolfenden L et al. Embedding researchers in health service organizations improves research translation and health service performance: The Australian Hunter New England Population Health example. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2017; 85 :3-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.007 - 25.
Guevara C, Aguilar J, González-Eras A. The Model of Adaptive Learning Objects for virtual environments instanced by the competencies. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal. 2017; 2 (3):345-355. DOI: 10.25046/aj020344 - 26.
Chergui O, Begdouri A, Groux-Leclet D. A classification of educational mobile use for learners and teachers. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 2017; 7 (5):324-330. DOI: 10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.5.889 - 27.
Dhawan S. Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2020; 49 (1):5-22. DOI: 10.1177/0047239520934018 - 28.
Lašáková A, Bajzíková Ľ, Dedze I. Barriers and drivers of innovation in higher education: Case study-based evidence across ten European universities. International Journal of Educational Development. 2017; 55 :69-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.06.002 - 29.
Chang A et al. The Clinical Microsystems Clerkship at University of California, San Francisco: Integrating clinical skills and health systems improvement for early medical students. Academic Medicine. 2022; 98 (1):57-61. DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000004955 - 30.
Englert NC. The relationship between selected variables and the National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses: A comparative analysis of pass/fail performance for traditional and second -degree baccalaureate students. A dissertation defended on December 8, 2009. Available from: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/10293/1/Englert_Nadine_December10_2009.pdf - 31.
Yurchenko K, Semenikhina OV. Stem education on open educational platforms. Naukovì Zapiski. 2023; 1 (208):282-287. DOI: 10.36550/2415-7988-2023-1-208-282-287 - 32.
Din NNO. Revolutionizing Higher Education: Enabling Global Dynamics Through Virtual Learning Environment. ResearchGate; 2023. pp. 32-35. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374755961 - 33.
Shaukat SM. Exploring the potential of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) in education. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology. 2023; 3 :52-57. DOI: 10.48175/ijarsct-12108 - 34.
Goodman MS, Onwumere O, Milam L, Peipert JF. Reducing health disparities by removing cost, access, and knowledge barriers. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017; 216 (4):382.e1-382.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.015