Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Schwann-Like Cells Derived from Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Their Potential for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration

Written By

Rogério Martins Amorim and Lucas Vinícius de Oliveira Ferreira

Submitted: 31 May 2024 Reviewed: 26 July 2024 Published: 08 September 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1006506

Stem Cell Transplantation IntechOpen
Stem Cell Transplantation Edited by Pier Paolo Piccaluga

From the Edited Volume

Stem Cell Transplantation [Working Title]

Dr. Pier Paolo Piccaluga, Dr. Giuseppe Visani and Dr. Shaimaa Salaheldin Khattab

Chapter metrics overview

12 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Peripheral nervous system (PNS) injuries pose a significant clinical challenge, often resulting in motor, sensory, or autonomic dysfunction that impacts patients’ quality of life. Despite the PNS’s capacity for regeneration, outcomes are not always satisfactory. In response to these challenges, new research is encouraged to provide more effective therapeutic approaches. In this context, cellular therapy emerges as a promising alternative. Evidence of the therapeutic potential of Schwann cells (SCs) in PNS injuries has been observed, yet their clinical application faces significant limitations. To address these difficulties, several studies have highlighted the ability of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to transdifferentiate into Schwann-like cells (SLCs), holding the potential for treating peripheral nerve injuries. Therefore, this chapter not only reviews the involvement of SCs in peripheral nerve regeneration but also provides an overview of recent advancements in developing SLCs derived from MSCs and their therapeutic potential in peripheral nerve injuries. Additionally, it explores the future perspective of manufacturing nerve guidance conduits (NGCs).

Keywords

  • nerve injury
  • neuroregeneration
  • cell-based therapy
  • nerve guidance conduits
  • regenerative medicine

1. Introduction

Injuries to the peripheral nervous system (PNS) are prevalent among both humans and animals, presenting a significant clinical challenge [1, 2]. These injuries stem from various causes, frequently associated with traumatic incidents [3, 4]. The resulting motor and sensory impairments are the foremost consequences, often leading to functional deficits and detrimentally impacting the patient’s quality of life [5, 6].

While the PNS demonstrates an innate ability for regeneration, primarily attributed to Schwann cells (SCs), the results frequently fall short of expectations [7, 8]. Given the complexities associated with peripheral nerve injuries, new research is encouraged to develop more efficacious therapeutic strategies.

In this context, cellular therapy emerges as a promising alternative. Evidence of Schwann cells’ therapeutic potential in treating PNS injuries has been observed [9, 10]. Nevertheless, its clinical application faces substantial limitations, including the necessity to sacrifice a functional nerve to obtain the cells and the challenge of cell expansion [11, 12].

To address these challenges, several studies have highlighted the potential of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) sourced from diverse sources and species to transdifferentiate into Schwann-like cells (SLCs), offering promising avenues for treating peripheral nerve injuries [13, 14, 15].

Therefore, this chapter reviews the role of SCs in peripheral nerve regeneration and offers insights into recent progress in creating SLCs from MSCs and their therapeutic potential in peripheral nerve injuries. Furthermore, it explores the future perspectives of fabricating nerve guidance conduits (NGCs).

2. Anatomy of the peripheral nerve

The PNS is composed of neurons, glial cells (including SCs), and stromal cells [16, 17]. This system consists of a combination of motor, sensory, and autonomic nerves responsible for connecting tissues and organs to the central nervous system (CNS) [18, 19]. Each peripheral nerve is formed by various bundles of fibers known as nerve fascicles or nerve bundles [20, 21]. The nerve fibers consist of axons surrounded by SCs, with differences in their diameter [22]. Axons with larger diameters are considered myelinated, as they are covered by the myelin sheath [23]. This is discontinuous, and the small areas between two segments of myelin, the unmyelinated space, are called Ranvier’s nodes, whose function is to allow the saltatory conduction of nerve impulses from one node to another, speeding up their transmission [22, 24].

Histologically, three layers of connective tissue support the peripheral nerves (Figure 1). The epineurium is the outermost layer comprising numerous nerve fascicles, blood vessels, lymphocytes, and fibroblasts, and is formed by loose connective tissue, whose function is to provide support to nerve bundles, mechanical protection, and isolation from the external environment [20, 25, 26]. The perineurium is the intermediate region that surrounds each nerve fascicle, providing tensile strength to the nerves and acting as a barrier regulating the entry and exit of substances from the nerve [25, 27]. The endoneurium is the innermost layer composed of loose collagen that surrounds both myelinated and unmyelinated nerve fibers, responsible for providing protection and nourishment to the individual axons [26, 28].

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of peripheral nerve anatomy. Created with Biorender.com

3. Peripheral nervous system injuries

Injuries to the PNS hold considerable clinical significance for medicine. These injuries are prevalent and can result in chronic pain, as well as loss of motor, sensory, or autonomic function in affected body segments, thereby diminishing the quality of life for both animals and humans [24, 29, 30, 31].

This condition affects a global population of at least 2 million individuals [2]. Epidemiological studies in developed countries indicate that peripheral nerve injuries occur at an estimated rate of 13–23 cases per 100,000 individuals annually [32]. The outcome of peripheral nerve repair after an injury is often unsatisfactory. It is estimated that only 3% of patients regain sensitivity, while motor function is regained by less than 25% of patients [33].

In veterinary medicine, studies demonstrate that occurrences of brachial plexus or sciatic nerve injuries are frequent in dogs and cats [34, 35]. Moreover, a study revealed that direct trauma is the most common cause of peripheral neuropathies in the thoracic limbs of horses [36]. Additionally, facial nerve paralysis is one of the most common neuropathies in horses, often attributed to traumatic events [37].

4. Classification of peripheral nerve injuries

The researcher Herbert Seddon first introduced the classification of peripheral nerve injuries in 1943, suggesting three distinct grades of injury [38]. The mildest grade, neuropraxia, involves focal demyelination without damage to the axons or surrounding connective tissues. In second-degree injuries, termed axonotmesis, there is a loss of axon continuity beyond focal demyelination. Finally, neurotmesis, the most severe grade, involves complete nerve sectioning.

In 1951, Sydney Sunderland expanded the classification to five grades (I–V), aiming to differentiate the extent of injuries to the connective tissues [39]. Grades I and V correspond to neuropraxia and neurotmesis, respectively, as classified by Seddon. Grades II and IV represent subdivisions of axonotmesis, differing in the involvement of connective tissue. In grade II, axon injury occurs without connective tissue involvement; in grade III, both axon and endoneurium are injured, while in grade IV, damage extends to axons, endoneurium, and perineurium. A new degree of injury was proposed by Mackinnon and Dellon in 1988, although its usage is not widely adopted, it is characterized by the occurrence of mixed lesions (Table 1) [40].

SeddonSunderlandInjury
NeuropraxiaIFocal demyelination
AxonotmesisIIAxon damaged without the involvement of the connective tissue
IIIAxon and endoneurium damaged
IVAxon, endoneurium, and perineurium damaged
NeurotmesisVComplete section of the nerve

Table 1.

Summary of the classification of peripheral nerve injuries. Adapted from Menorca et al. [18].

5. Peripheral nerve degeneration

After PNS injury, Wallerian degeneration ensues, marked by distal degeneration of the injured nerve, clearance of inhibitory cellular debris, and proliferation of SCs, establishing a pro-regenerative microenvironment [41]. The axonal microtubules start to disorganize, initiating the dissolution of the axonal cytoskeleton [22]. During the initial days following injury, an influx of calcium ions triggers the activation of calpain proteases, which proceed to degrade axonal neurofilaments, resulting in the release of granular debris [42, 43, 44].

Additionally, SCs convert into a repair phenotype, characterized by a specific profile that facilitates the regeneration process [45]. These cells assist in the degradation of cellular debris and myelin residues, an essential process, considering that myelin contains molecules that inhibit axonal growth [24, 46].

The expression of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1α, -1β, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 is positively regulated [47]. This process leads to SC proliferation and the recruitment of macrophages and other immune cells to the injury site [48]. The macrophages, attracted to the site of injury along with the SCs, are essential for neuroregeneration, as they control the inflammatory process and degrade myelin debris, thus promoting a favorable microenvironment for regeneration [49]. After phagocytizing myelin debris and other waste, macrophages are either eliminated through local apoptosis or re-enter circulation [22].

In the proximal segment of the injured nerve, to a lesser extent, the process of retrograde degeneration occurs until the next preserved Ranvier node [18, 22, 50]. The alterations in this segment differ depending on the severity and location of the injury. Apoptosis typically occurs in lesions near the neuronal cell body, while reversible chromatolysis may occur in certain cases [18, 51].

6. Involvement of Schwann cells in peripheral nerve regeneration

After injury, the PNS exhibits a remarkable capacity for regeneration [52]. Concurrently with the degeneration process, a series of cellular and molecular events are initiated to facilitate nerve repair. Essential to this process is the integrity of both the neuronal body and SCs [53]. The SCs promote regeneration through proliferation, secretion of neurotrophic factors, cytokines, and phagocytosis of myelin debris [46, 54]. These cells proliferate, undergo elongation, and align within their basal lamina to form Büngner bands, which serve as guidance and support for axonal growth [23, 44].

Furthermore, SCs play a pivotal role in synthesizing neurotrophic factors crucial for axonal guidance and growth. These factors include brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2), glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), nerve growth factor (NGF), and neurotrophins -3, -4, and -5 (NT-3/4/5), which selectively interact with tropomyosin receptor kinases (TrkA, -B, and -C) and p75 neurotrophin receptors [50, 55].

SCs play a pivotal role in creating a conducive environment post-injury, employing autophagy/myelinophagy mechanisms and orchestrating macrophage recruitment [23]. Macrophages, in turn, release molecules associated with neovascularization, such as vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), which aids in oxygen supply to the injury site and guides repair SCs during the regenerative phase [49]. Additionally, SCs produce proteins such as laminin and fibronectin that are incorporated into the extracellular matrix and promote the extension of regenerating axons [56].

Although the PNS exhibits intrinsic repair capabilities, several factors may hinder this process, such as the disorganized growth of regenerating axons, which may fail to reach their target organs, difficulty in obtaining a large number of axons from the proximal to the distal stump, loss of nerve-muscle connections leading to muscle fiber atrophy. Furthermore, when there is chronic loss of contact between Schwann cells and axons, the basal laminae and Büngner bands are not maintained, creating an environment that does not support regeneration (Figure 2) [23, 48, 53].

Figure 2.

Schematic representation of participation of SCs in peripheral nerve regeneration after injury. The SCs promote regeneration through proliferation, recruitment of macrophages, phagocytosis of myelin debris, secretion of neurotrophic factors, incorporation of proteins into the extracellular membrane, and the formation of Büngner bands. Created with Biorender.com

7. Mesenchymal stem cells

MSCs are multipotent progenitor cells of non-hematopoietic origin isolated from various adult tissues. They are characterized by their ability to proliferate and differentiate in vitro into various mesenchymal lineages in response to appropriate stimuli, including adipocytes, chondrocytes, and osteocytes [57, 58].

Although it is a widely debated topic, studies suggest that MSCs, under specific conditions, possess the ability to differentiate into cells derived from all three germ layers, including neurons, glial cells, and hepatocytes [15, 59, 60, 61].

The International Society for Cellular Therapy has defined minimum criteria for characterizing MSCs in humans. These criteria include adherence to plastic, expression or absence of specific surface markers (Cluster of Differentiation), and the capacity to differentiate into the three mesodermal lineages, osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic, when subjected to appropriate stimuli [62].

Cellular therapy based on MSCs holds promise in regenerative medicine, especially for treating nerve injuries in both humans and veterinary medicine. MSCs have the potential to differentiate into various cell types and demonstrate immunomodulatory, neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, antiapoptotic, and angiogenic properties [61, 63].

The initial source of MSCs was discovered in bone marrow, and despite requiring invasive harvesting procedures, it continues to be extensively investigated [64]. The most commonly utilized MSCs in clinical trials are derived from adipose tissue, bone marrow, and umbilical cord [65]. Adipose tissue-derived MSCs offer several advantages, including easy isolation, high availability, and a high rate of in vitro proliferation [64, 66]. Additionally, recent studies are exploring MSCs from other sources, such as those derived from umbilical cord, due to their non-invasive obtainment, abundance, and easy accessibility [67]. Furthermore, they can be easily obtained after birth and raise fewer ethical concerns [68].

MSCs can also be isolated from a variety of tissues, including Wharton’s jelly, amniotic fluid, endometrium, placenta, hair follicles, skin, peripheral blood, synovium, and synovial fluid [63].

8. Schwann-like cells derived from mesenchymal stem cells

SCs play a crucial role in peripheral nerve regeneration, as previously discussed. However, their clinical application involves sacrificing a healthy nerve from the donor, and their proliferation in culture is time-consuming [69]. Due to these limitations, transdifferentiating MSCs into SLC cells has been proposed as an alternative approach for cell-based therapy in peripheral nerve injuries.

The first protocol developed to induce the transdifferentiation of MSCs into SLCs in vitro was outlined by Dezawa et al. [70]. In this study, rat bone marrow-derived MSCs were exposed to a combination of factors, including beta-mercaptoethanol, retinoic acid, forskolin, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and Heregulin (HRG) [70]. Based on this method, several other approaches have been developed over time, utilizing MSCs from different sources and species.

The first documented success in transdifferentiating adipose tissue-derived MSCs into SLCs in vitro was reported by Kingham and colleagues using rat MSCs [71]. The researchers achieved this by extending the induction period, increasing the concentration of FSK, and incorporating glial growth factor-2 (GGF2) into the protocol initially established by Dezawa et al. [70, 71].

Other alternative strategies for transdifferentiation include the addition of neurotrophic factors such as BDNF [72] and NGF [73], as well as glucocorticoids, insulin and progesterone to the differentiation medium [74]. Additionally, methods such as electrostimulation [75], intermittent induction [76], cell imprinting [77], and the use of conditioned culture medium containing factors secreted from peripheral nerves of rats [78, 79, 80] and equine [15] have been reported.

Most studies assess the success of in vitro transdifferentiation based on morphological changes and the expression of specific markers of SCs [15, 78, 79, 81]. These morphological changes typically involve cells adopting a bipolar and/or tripolar shape, featuring large nuclei and fine cytoplasmic processes [15, 78, 80]. Regarding markers, S100 calcium-binding protein (S100), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and p75 are commonly used for the evaluation of transdifferentiation. However, there is no consensus on which ones to use (Table 2). However, the expression of glial markers is considered the most important criterion for identifying transdifferentiation [126].

Schwann cell markersReferences
GFAP[83]
S100[84, 85, 86]
S100, GFAP[14, 30, 78, 79, 80, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92]
S100, p75 NGFR[75, 93, 94, 95, 96]
S100, GFAP, p75 NGFR[13, 71, 73, 81, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109]
S100, GFAP, Nestin[110, 111]
S100, GFAP, MBP[112, 113, 114]
S100, p75 NGFR, Oct-6[115]
S100, p75 NGFR, Integrin β4[116]
S100, GFAP, p75 NGFR, O4[70]
S100, GFAP, p75 NGFR, erbB3[117]
S100, GFAP, p75 NGFR, Nestin[118]
S100, p75 NGFR, PMP-22[119]
S100, GFAP, MBP, Nestin[120]
S100, p75 NGFR, P0, MAG[121]
S100, GFAP, P0, PMP-22[122]
S100, GFAP, p75 NGFR, MBP[15]
S100, GFAP, p75 NGFR, P0, L1[123]
S100, GFAP, p75 NGFR, MBP, P0[124]
S100, GFAP, p75 NGFR, P0, O4, Sox10, Krox20[125]

Table 2.

Different markers used to characterize transdifferentiation in SLCs. Adapted from Ramli et al. [82].

Abbreviation: glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP); S100 calcium-binding protein (S100); nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR); myelin basic protein (MBP); oligodendrocyte 4 (O4); epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (erbB3); peripheral myelin protein 22 (PMP-22); protein zero (P0); myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG).

Western blot, immunofluorescence, and PCR are the primary methods utilized to verify their expression [127]. Additionally, other assessments such as evaluating the secretion of neurotrophic factors, co-culturing with dorsal root ganglion neurons and assessing myelination can be conducted [126, 128].

Studies involving MSCs from rats and humans have demonstrated an increase in the secretion of neurotrophic factors, including BDNF, GDNF, NGF, and VEGF-A, following transdifferentiation [129, 130]. Furthermore, a significant upregulation in the expression of BDNF and GDNF was observed after in vitro transdifferentiation using human [131] and equine [15] MSCs.

9. Therapeutic potential of Schwann-like cells derived from mesenchymal stem cells for peripheral nerve injuries

The evaluation of SLCs transplantation in peripheral nerve injuries is constantly evolving, and the promising results have been reported. In this topic, assessments have been divided, considering the different sources of MSCs to obtain SLCs.

9.1 Bone marrow MSCs-derived SLCs

Bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs) have been extensively researched for peripheral nerve regeneration. Studies highlight the promising results achieved with BM-MSCs-derived SLCs. In models of sciatic nerve transection in rats with a 12 mm gap, BM-MSCs derived SLCs from rats were transferred to hollow fibers and cellular transplantation was performed [97]. This intervention resulted in significant improvements in motor nerve conduction velocity, sciatic nerve function, reconstruction of Ranvier’s nodes, and myelination [97]. Additionally, no tumor formations were detected within six months after transplantation [97]. Another study, also employing a rat model with a 12-mm gap lesion, utilized chitosan nerve conduits seeded with SLCs, resulting in improvements in remyelination and axonal regrowth [94]. However, no significant results were observed compared to treatment with SCs derived from the sciatic nerve [94]. Using human BM-MSCs, a study conducted the transplantation of hollow conduits seeded with SCLs and treated with tacrolimus in rats with a 10 mm gap lesion, resulting in functional recovery of the sciatic nerve [123].

Moreover, in a model of transection of the buccal branch of the rabbit facial nerve with a 1-cm gap, it was evidenced that rabbit SLCs within the autologous vein graft accelerate axonal regeneration and promote better remyelination [103]. Another study, utilizing rat SLCs incorporated into a polyglycolic acid tube, revealed promising results in nerve regeneration following neurotmesis of the mandibular branch of the rat facial nerve [115].

9.2 Adipose tissue MSCs-derived SLCs

Adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AT-MSCs) have garnered interest in regenerative medicine due to their widespread availability and ease of obtainment. In experimental models of rat sciatic nerve transection with a 10-mm gap [116, 130, 132, 133] and 15-mm gap [134], the transplantation of AT-MSCs transdifferentiated into SLCs, from both rats [116, 132, 133, 134] and humans [130], into nerve fibrin conduits [130, 132, 133], aligned collagen matrix [134] and silicone [116] has shown improvements in axonal regeneration [116, 130, 132, 133, 134], increased neurotrophic factors, vascularization [130], myelination [116] and reduction in muscle atrophy [133].

A study compared the transplantation of rat AT-MSCs, SLCs, and SCs incorporated into silicone nerve conduits with collagen gel in a 7-mm gap model of rat facial nerve and concluded that the groups exhibited a similar potential for nerve regeneration [108].

Additionally, the use of sheep as an animal model showed promising results by employing acellular nerve allografts recellularized with ovine SLCs after experimentally inducing a 30-mm gap in the animals’ peroneal nerve [86].

In crush models, positive results were also observed. The capacity for myelination formation was demonstrated after the transplantation of human SLCs in an experiment involving tibial nerve crush injury in athymic nude rats [135]. Another study demonstrated that the transplantation of SLCs from rats obtained through the approach utilizing a conditioned medium with factors secreted by the rat sciatic nerve assisted in peripheral nerve regeneration in a rat sciatic nerve crush injury model [79].

9.3 Wharton’s jelly MSCs-derived SLCs

Wharton’s jelly-derived MSCs can be easily obtained in abundance and have been widely investigated [136]. The use of human MSCs transdifferentiated into SLCs, combined with Matrigel grafting in a rat sciatic nerve transection model with an 8-mm gap, promoted myelination and enhanced nerve regeneration [125]. Moreover, acellular nerve grafts combined with SLCs have been shown to promote peripheral nerve regeneration in a rat sciatic nerve injury model with 6-mm nerve defects [12].

9.4 Umbilical cord blood MSCs-derived SLCs

Umbilical cord blood-derived MSCs (UCB-MSCs) are widely investigated due to their extensive availability and non-invasive collection process [137]. Transplantation of human UCB-MSCs-derived SLCs, organized into three-dimensional (3D) cellular spheroids using a methylcellulose hydrogel system, in a rat sciatic nerve crush injury model, stimulated nerve structure regeneration and promoted motor function recovery [138].

10. Future perspectives of fabricating nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) for peripheral nerve injuries

To promote the regeneration of peripheral nerve injuries, various strategies are being investigated, including the use of NGCs in defects with long gaps [139]. These tubular structures provide a suitable microenvironment between the ends of the injured nerve, favoring neuroregeneration [43]. NGCs can be constructed from non-biological materials, as well as autogenous and allogeneic biological materials [140].

NGCs may originate from synthetic or natural origin, a blend of both, and exhibit structural variations related to porosity and filament presence [25]. The material is chosen based on its biocompatibility, permeability, resorption time, strength, and surface characteristics [141, 142]. NGCs are designed and manufactured to provide different mechanical, biological, and biochemical stimuli (Figure 3) [25, 143].

Figure 3.

Schematic illustration of NGC fabrication featuring various configurations and integrated with biochemical, biological, and mechanical cues for peripheral nerve regeneration. Created with Biorender.com

Several techniques, such as micro-patterning, injection molding, unidirectional freezing, electrospinning, and 3D printing, have been employed in the fabrication of NGCs [25]. The emergence of 3D bioprinting allows for the construction of NGCs aimed at regenerating tissues with complex architectures and specific production for each case [139]. In bioprinting, bioink is prepared with living cells that are employed as fundamental elements, while support materials serve as a base structure, enabling the creation of 3D tissue structures [144].

The use of 3D bioprinting allows for greater mechanical stability, high porosity, reproducibility, and adaptability to various polymers, mimicking the structural details of the nerve region to be replaced [144, 145, 146]. Bioprinting shows great potential; however, it faces some challenges that need to be overcome to acquire the precise architecture of nervous tissue. This involves reproducing nerve microanatomy, precisely depositing different types of cells in a controlled environment within the hydrogel, in addition to the composition and mechanical properties of the bioink [144]. A futuristic area is the use of the four-dimensional (4D) technology approach, which may allow for material adaptation in response to stimuli, mimicking physiological variations of the body [25, 147]. The primary goal of future research on NGCs is to make them functional, and the combination with SLCs represents potential future research that could further enhance the neureregenerative capacity after injury.

11. Conclusions

The regeneration of the PNS remains a major challenge. SCs are the main glial cells present in the PNS and are of the utmost importance in its regeneration. SC transplantation has emerged as a promising cellular therapy for the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries. However, due to the limitations associated with its use, research has advanced toward alternative approaches to overcome these constraints, such as the transdifferentiation of MSCs into SLCs. Several sources of MSCs, from different species, have been transdifferentiated into SLCs and have become a great promise as substitutes for SCs in nerve regeneration.

Several studies have provided evidence of the beneficial effects of SLC transplantation for treating peripheral nerve injuries. However, there are still significant issues to address. Further research is needed to investigate different doses, application frequencies, long-term assessments post-transplantation, potential immune responses, transplantation in chronic injuries, and the use of several biomaterials as cell carriers. Therefore, conducting more preclinical studies is crucial before advancing to clinical application. SC-based therapy has the potential to become an even more attractive and effective strategy for treating PNS injuries.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Acronyms and abbreviations

3D

three-dimensional

4D

four-dimensional

AT-MSCs

adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells

BDNF

brain-derived neurotrophic factor

bFGF

basic fibroblast growth factor

BME

beta-mercaptoethanol

BM-MSCs

bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells

CNS

central nervous system

CNTF

ciliary neurotrophic factor

ErbB3

epidermal growth factor receptor 3

FGF-2

fibroblast growth factor 2

FSK

forskolin

GDNF

glial-derived neurotrophic factor

GFAP

glial fibrillary acidic protein

GGF2

glial growth factor-2

HGF

hepatocyte growth factor

HRG

heregulin

IDO

indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase

IGF

insulin-like growth factor

IL

interleukin

LIF

leukemia inhibitory factor

MAG

myelin-associated glycoprotein

MBP

myelin basic protein

MCP-1

monocyte chemoattractant protein-1

MSCs

mesenchymal stem cells

NGC

nerve guidance conduits

NGF

nerve growth factor

NGFR

nerve growth factor receptor

NT

neurotrophins

O4

oligodendrocyte 4

P0

protein zero

PDGF

platelet-derived growth factor

PGE2

prostaglandin E2

PMP-22

peripheral myelin protein 22

PNS

peripheral nervous system

RA

retinoic acid

S100

S100 calcium-binding protein

SCs

Schwann cells

SLCs

Schwann-like cells

TGF-β

transforming growth factor beta

TNF-α

tumor necrosis factor

UCB-MSCs

umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells

VEGF-A

vascular endothelial growth factor A

References

  1. 1. Sivanarayanan TB, Bhat IA, Sharun K, Palakkara S, Singh R, Remya V, et al. Allogenic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and its conditioned media for repairing acute and sub-acute peripheral nerve injuries in a rabbit model. Tissue and Cells. 2023;82:102053. DOI: 10.1016/j.tice.2023.102053
  2. 2. Shan Y, Xu L, Cui X, Wang E, Jiang F, Li J, et al. A responsive cascade drug delivery scaffold adapted to the therapeutic time window for peripheral nerve injury repair. Materials Horizons. 2024;11:1032-1045. DOI: 10.1039/d3mh01511d
  3. 3. Piovesana R, Faroni A, Tata AM, Reid AJ. Schwann-like adipose-derived stem cells as a promising therapeutic tool for peripheral nerve regeneration: Effects of cholinergic stimulation. Neural Regeneration Research. 2021;16:1218-1220. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.300433
  4. 4. Dong Y, Alhaskawi A, Zhou H, Zou X, Liu Z, Ezzi SHA, et al. Imaging diagnosis in peripheral nerve injury. Frontiers in Neurology. 2023;14:1250808. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1250808
  5. 5. Luo L, He Y, Jin L, Zhang Y, Guastaldi FP, Albashari AA, et al. Application of bioactive hydrogels combined with dental pulp stem cells for the repair of large gap peripheral nerve injuries. Bioactive Materials. 2021;6:638-654. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.028
  6. 6. Zhang RC, Du WQ , Zhang JY, Yu SX, Lu FZ, Ding HM, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell treatment for peripheral nerve injury: A narrative review. Neural Regeneration Research. 2021;16:2170-2176. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.310941
  7. 7. Alvites R, Lopes B, Coelho A, Maurício AC. Peripheral nerve regeneration: A challenge far from being overcome. Regenerative Medicine. 2024;19:155-159. DOI: 10.2217/rme-2023-0072
  8. 8. Huang Y, Wu L, Zhao Y, Guo J, Li R, Ma S, et al. Schwann cell promotes macrophage recruitment through IL-17B/IL-17RB pathway in injured peripheral nerves. Cell Reports. 2024;43:113753. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113753
  9. 9. Zhang YL, Chen DJ, Yang BL, Liu TT, Li JJ, Wang XQ , et al. Microencapsulated Schwann cell transplantation inhibits P2X3 receptor expression in dorsal root ganglia and neuropathic pain. Neural Regeneration Research. 2018;13:1961-1967. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.238715
  10. 10. Han GH, Peng J, Liu P, Ding X, Wei S, Lu S, et al. Therapeutic strategies for peripheral nerve injury: Decellularized nerve conduits and Schwann cell transplantation. Neural Regeneration Research. 2019;14:1343-1351. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.253511
  11. 11. Liu Y, Dong R, Zhang C, Yang Y, Xu Y, Wang H, et al. Therapeutic effects of nerve leachate-treated adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells on rat sciatic nerve injury. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2020;19:223-231. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.8203
  12. 12. Choi SJ, Park SY, Shin YH, Heo SH, Kim KH, Lee H, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from Wharton’s Jelly can differentiate into Schwann cell-like cells and promote peripheral nerve regeneration in acellular nerve grafts. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2021;18:467-478. DOI: 10.1007/s13770-020-00329-6
  13. 13. Park S, Jung N, Myung S, Choi Y, Chung KW, Choi BO, et al. Differentiation of human tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells into Schwann-like cells improves neuromuscular function in a mouse model of Charcot-Marie-tooth disease type 1A. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018;19:2393. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19082393
  14. 14. Hu X, Wang X, Xu Y, Li L, Liu J, He Y, et al. Electric conductivity on aligned nanofibers facilitates the transdifferentiation of mesenchymal stem cells intro Schwann cells and regeneration of injured peripheral nerve. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2020;9:e1901570. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201901570
  15. 15. Ferreira LVO, Kamura BC, Oliveira JPM, Chimenes ND, Carvalho M, Santos LA, et al. In vitro transdifferentiation potential of equine mesenchymal stem cells into Schwann-like cells. Stem Cells and Development. 2023;32:422-432. DOI: 10.1089/scd.2022.0274
  16. 16. Leberfinger AN, Ravnic DJ, Payne R, Rizk E, Koduru SV, Hazard SW. Adipose-derived stem cells in peripheral nerve regeneration. Current Surgery Reports. 2017;5:1-9. DOI: 10.1007/s40137-017-0169-2
  17. 17. Sumarwoto T, Suroto H, Mahyudin F, Utomo DN, Romaniyanto TD, et al. Role of adipose mesenchymal stem cells and secretome in peripheral nerve regeneration. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2021;67:102482. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102482
  18. 18. Menorca RMG, Fussell TS, Elfar JC. Nerve physiology: Mechanisms of injury and recovery. Hand Clinics. 2013;29:317-330. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.04.002
  19. 19. Lanigan LG, Russell DS, Woolard KD, Pardo ID, Godfrey V, Jortner BS, et al. Comparative pathology of the peripheral nervous system. Veterinary Pathology. 2021;58:10-33. DOI: 10.1177/0300985820959231
  20. 20. Liu Q , Wang X, Yi S. Pathophysiological changes of physical barriers of peripheral nerves after injury. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2018;12:597. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00597
  21. 21. Wang ML, Rivlin M, Graham JG, Beredjiklian PK. Peripheral nerve injury, scarring, and recovery. Connective Tissue Research. 2019;60:3-9. DOI: 10.1080/03008207.2018.1489381
  22. 22. Alvites RD, Branquinho MV, Caseiro AR, Pedrosa SS, Luís AL, Geuna S, et al. In: Turker H, Benavides LG, Gallardo GR, Villar MM, editors. Peripheral Nerve Disorders and Treatment [Internet]. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2020. pp. 67-115. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.78159
  23. 23. Jessen KR, Mirsky R. The success and failure of the Schwann cell response to nerve injury. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 2019;13:33. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00033
  24. 24. Riccio M, Marchesini A, Pugliese P, Francesco F. Nerve repair and regeneration: Biological tubulization limits and future perspectives. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2019;234:3362-3375. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.27299
  25. 25. Vijayavenkataraman S. Nerve guide conduits for peripheral nerve injury repair: A review on design, materials and fabrication methods. Acta Biomaterialia. 2020;106:54-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.003
  26. 26. Wang Y, Zhang Y, Li X, Zhang Q. The progress of biomaterials in peripheral nerve repair and regeneration. Journal of Neurorestoratology. 2020;8:252-269. DOI: 10.26599/JNR.2020.9040022
  27. 27. Kim J. Neural reanimation advances and new technologies. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America. 2016;24:71-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsc.2015.09.006
  28. 28. Houdek MT, Shin AY. Management and complications of traumatic peripheral nerve injuries. Hand Clinics. 2015;31:151-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2015.01.007
  29. 29. Campbell WW. Evaluation and management of peripheral nerve injury. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2008;119:1951-1965. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.018
  30. 30. Villagrán CC, Schumacher J, Donnell R, Dhar MS. A novel model for acute peripheral nerve injury in the horse and evaluation of the effect of mesenchymal stromal cells applied in situ on nerve regeneration: A preliminary study. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2016;3:80. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00080
  31. 31. Bolívar S, Navarro X, Udina E. Schwann cell role in selectivity of nerve regeneration. Cells. 2020;9:2131. DOI: 10.3390/cells9092131
  32. 32. Li R, Liu Z, Pan Y, Chen L, Zhang Z, Lu L. Peripheral nerve injuries treatment: A systematic review. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2014;68:449-454. DOI: 10.1007/s12013-013-9742-1
  33. 33. Houshyar S, Bhattacharyya A, Shanks R. Peripheral nerve conduit: Materials and structures. ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 2019;10:3349-3365. DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00203
  34. 34. Forterre F, Tomek A, Rytz U, Brunnberg L, Jaggy A, Spreng D. Iatrogenic sciatic nerve injury in eighteen dogs and nine cats (1997-2006). Veterinary Surgery. 2007;36:464-471. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00293.x
  35. 35. Soens IV, Struys MM, Polis IE, Bhatti SF, Meervenne SAV, Martlé VA, et al. Magnetic stimulation of the radial nerve in dogs and cats with brachial plexus trauma: A report of 53 cases. The Veterinary Journal. 2009;182:108-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.05.007
  36. 36. Emond AL, Bertoni L, Seignour M, Coudry V, Denoix JM. Peripheral neuropathy of a forelimb in horses: 27 cases (2000-2013). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 2016;249:1187-1195. DOI: 10.2460/javma.249.10.1187
  37. 37. Boorman S, Scherrer NM, Stefanovski D, Johnson AL. Facial nerve paralysis in 64 equids: Clinical variables, diagnosis, and outcome. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 2020;34:1308-1320. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15767
  38. 38. Seddon HJ. Three types of nerve injury. Brain. 1943;66:237-288. DOI: 10.1093/brain/66.4.237
  39. 39. Sunderland S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain. 1951;74:491-516. DOI: 10.1093/brain/74.4.491
  40. 40. Mackinnon S, Dellon A. Diagnosisof nerve injury. In: Surgery of the Peripheral Nerve. New York: Thieme; 1988. pp. 74-79
  41. 41. Lin YF, Xie Z, Zhou J, Yin G, Lin HD. Differential gene and protein expression between rat tibial nerve and common peroneal nerve during Wallerian degeneration. Neural Regeneration Research. 2019;14:2183-2191. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.262602
  42. 42. Salvadores N, Gerónimo-Olvera C, Court FA. Axonal degeneration in AD: The contribution of Aβ and Tau. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2020;12:581767. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.581767
  43. 43. Lopes B, Sousa P, Alvites R, Branquinho M, Sousa AC, Mendonça C, et al. Peripheral nerve injury treatments and advances: One health perspective. International Journal of Molecular Science. 2022;23:918. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23020918
  44. 44. Wan T, Zhang FS, Qin MY, Jiang HR, Zhang M, Qu Y. Growth factors: Bioactive macromolecular drugs for peripheral nerve injury treatment – Molecular mechanisms and delivery platforms. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2024;170:116024. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.116024
  45. 45. Wilcox M, Gregory H, Powell R, Quick TJ, Phillips JB. Strategies for peripheral nerve repair. Current Tissue Microenvironment Reports. 2020;1:49-59. DOI: 10.1007/s43152-020-00002-z
  46. 46. Rao Z, Lin Z, Song P, Quan D, Bai Y. Biomaterial-based Schwann cell transplantation and Schwann cell-derived biomaterials for nerve regeneration. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 2022;16:926222. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2022.926222
  47. 47. Pandey S, Mudgal J. A review on the role of endogenous neurotrophins and Schwann cells in axonal regeneration. Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology. 2022;17:398-408. DOI: 10.1007/s11481-021-10034-3
  48. 48. Rhode SC, Beier JP, Ruhl T. Adipose tissue stem cells in peripheral nerve regeneration—In vitro and in vivo. Journal of Neuroscience Research. 2021;99:545-560. DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24738
  49. 49. Wu G, Wen X, Kuang R, Lui KHW, He B, Li G, et al. Roles of macrophages and their interactions with Schwann cells after peripheral nerve injury. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology. 2024;44:11. DOI: 10.1007/s10571-023-01442-5
  50. 50. Bhandari PS. Management of peripheral nerve injury. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2019;10:862-866. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.08.003
  51. 51. Rishal I, Fainzilber M. Axon-soma communication in neuronal injury. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2014;15:32-42. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3609
  52. 52. Lee D, Tran HQ , Dudley AT, Yang K, Yan Z, Xie J. Advancing nerve regeneration: Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) chip empowering high-speed biomaterial and drug screening. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2024;486:150210. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.150210
  53. 53. Scheib J, Höke A. Advances in peripheral nerve regeneration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2013;9:668-676. DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.227
  54. 54. Sullivan R, Dailey T, Duncan K, Abel N, Borlongan CV. Peripheral nerve injury: Stem cell therapy and peripheral nerve transfer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016;17:2101. DOI: 10.3390/ijms17122101
  55. 55. Gonçalves NP, Mohseni S, El Soury M, Ulrichsen M, Richner M, Xiao J, et al. Peripheral nerve regeneration is independent from Schwann cell p75NTR expression. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 2019;13:235. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00235
  56. 56. Caillaud M, Richard L, Vallat JM, Desmoulière A, Billet F. Peripheral nerve regeneration and intraneural revascularization. Neural Regeneration Research. 2019;14:24-33. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.243699
  57. 57. Barberini DJ, Freitas NPP, Magnoni MS, Maia L, Listoni AJ, Heckler MC, et al. Equine mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, adipose tissue and umbilical cord: Immunophenotypic characterization and differentiation potential. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2014;5:25. DOI: 10.1186/scrt414
  58. 58. MacDonald E, Barrett JG. The potential of mesenchymal stem cells to treat systemic inflammation in horses. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2020;6:507. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00507
  59. 59. Villagrán CC, Amelse L, Neilsen N, Dunlap J, Dhar M. Differentiation of equine mesenchymal stromal cells into cells of neural lineage: Potential for clinical applications. Stem Cells International. 2014;2014:891518. DOI: 10.1155/2014/891518
  60. 60. Pennington MR, Curtis TM, Divers TJ, Wagner B, Ness SL, Tennant BC, et al. Equine mesenchymal stromal cells from different sources efficiently differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 2016;22:596-607. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2015.0403
  61. 61. Andrzejewska A, Lukomska B, Janowski M. Concise review: Mesenchymal stem cells: From roots to boost. Stem Cells. 2019;37:855-864. DOI: 10.1002/stem.3016
  62. 62. Dominici M, Blanc KL, Mueller I, Cortenbach IS, Marini FC, Krause D, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stem stromal cells. The international society for cellular therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8:315-317. DOI: 10.1080/14653240600855905
  63. 63. Maličev E, Jazbec K. An overview of mesenchymal stem cell heterogeneity and concentration. Pharmaceuticals. 2024;17:350. DOI: 10.3390/ph17030350
  64. 64. Hopf A, Schaefer DJ, Kalbermatten DF, Guzman R, Madduri S. Schwann cell-like cells: Origin and usability for repair and regeneration of the peripheral and central nervous system. Cells. 2020;9:1990. DOI: 10.3390/cells9091990
  65. 65. Biglari N, Mehdizadeh A, Mastanabad MV, Gharaeikhezri MH, Afrakoti LGMP, Pourbala H, et al. Application of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in neurodegenerative disorders: History, findings, and prospective challenges. Pathology, Research and Practice. 2023;247:154541. DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154541
  66. 66. Qomi RT, Sheykhhasan M. Adipose-derived stromal cell in regenerative medicine: A review. World Journal of Stem Cells. 2017;9:107-117. DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v9.i8.107
  67. 67. Merlo B, Teti G, Mazzotti E, Ingrà L, Salvatore V, Buzzi M, et al. Wharton’s Jelly derived mesenchymal stem cells: Comparing human and horse. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. 2018;14:574-584. DOI: 10.1007/s12015-018-9803-3
  68. 68. Jiang L, Jones S, Jia X. Stem cell transplantation for peripheral nerve regeneration: Current options and opportunities. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017;18:94. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18010094
  69. 69. Saffari S, Saffari TM, Ulrich DJO, Hovius SER, Shin AY. The interaction of stem cells and vascularity in peripheral nerve regeneration. Neural Regeneration Research. 2021;16:1510-1517. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.303009
  70. 70. Dezawa M, Takahashi I, Esaki M, Takano M, Sawada H. Sciatic nerve regeneration in rats induced by transplantation of in vitro differentiated bone-marrow stromal cells. The European Journal of Neuroscience. 2001;14:1771-1776. DOI: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01814.x
  71. 71. Kingham PJ, Kalbermatten DF, Mahay D, Armstrong SJ, Wiberg M, Terenghi G. Adipose-derived stem cells differentiate into a Schwann cell phenotype and promote neurite outgrowth in vitro. Experimental Neurology. 2007;207:267-274. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.06.029
  72. 72. Gao S, Zheng Y, Cai Q , Wu X, Yao W, Wang J. Different methods for inducing adipose-derived stem cells to differentiate into Schwann-like cells. Archives of Medical Science: AMS. 2015;11:886-892. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2015.53310
  73. 73. Xiao YZ, Wang S. Differentiation of Schwann-like cells from human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Molecular Medicine Reports. 2015;11:1146-1152. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2840
  74. 74. Kang Y, Liu Y, Liu Z, Ren S, Xiong H, Chen J, et al. Differentiated human adipose-derived stromal cells exhibits the phenotypic and functional characteristics of mature Schwann cells through a modified approach. Cytotherapy. 2019;21:987-1003. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2019.04.061
  75. 75. Das SR, Uz M, Ding S, Lentner MT, Hondred JA, Cargill AA, et al. Electrical differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into Schwann-cell like phenotypes using inkjet printed graphene circuits. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2017;6:1601087. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201601087
  76. 76. Sun X, Zhu Y, Yin HY, Guo ZY, Xu F, Xiao B, et al. Differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells into Schwann cell-like cells through intermittent induction: Potential advantage of cellular transient memory function. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2018;9:133. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-018-0884-3
  77. 77. Moghaddam MM, Bonakdar S, Shokrgozar MA, Zaminy A, Vali H, Faghihi S. Engineered substrates with imprinted cell-like topographies induce direct differentiation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells into Schwann cells. Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology. 2019;47:1022-1035. DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2019.1586718
  78. 78. Liu Y, Zhang Z, Qin Y, Wu H, Lv Q , Chen X, et al. A new method for Schwann-like cells differentiation of adipose derived stem cells. Neuroscience Letters. 2013;551:79-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.07.012
  79. 79. Tawab SA, Omar SMM, Zeid AAA, Saba C. Role of adipose tissue-derived stem cells versus differentiated Schwann-like cells transplantation on the regeneration of crushed sciatic nerve in rats. A histological study. International Journal of Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics. 2018;1:1-10
  80. 80. Galhom RA, Raouf HHHA, Ali MHM. Role of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells and Schwann-like cells transplantation on spinal cord injury in adult male albino rats. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2018;108:1365-1375. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.09.131
  81. 81. Mathot F, Shin AY, Wijnen AJV. Targeted stimulation of MSCs in peripheral nerve repair. Gene. 2019;710:17-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.02.078
  82. 82. Ramli K, Gasim IA, Ahmad AA, Hassan S, Law ZK, Tan GC, et al. Human bone marrow-derived MSCs spontaneously express specific Schwann cell markers. Cell Biology International. 2019;43:233-252. DOI: 10.1002/cbin.11067
  83. 83. Faroni A, Rothwell SW, Grolla AA, Terenghi G, Magnaghi V, Verkhratsky A. Differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells into Schwann cell phenotype induces expression of P2X receptors that control cell death. Cell Death & Disease. 2013;4:e743. DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2013.268
  84. 84. Han IH, Sun F, Choi YJ, Zou F, Nam KH, Cho WH, et al. Cultures of Schwann-like cells differentiated from adipose-derived stem cells on PDMS/MWNT sheets as a scaffold for peripheral nerve regeneration. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2015;103:3642-3648. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35488
  85. 85. Zhu H, Yang A, Du J, Li D, Liu M, Ding F, et al. Basic fibroblast growth factor is a key factor that induces bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells towards cells with Schwann cell phenotype. Neuroscience Letters. 2014;559:82-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.11.044
  86. 86. Tamez-Mata Y, Montoya FEP, Rodríguez HGM, Pérez MMG, Cantú AAR, Flores JRG, et al. Nerve gaps repaired with acellular nerve allografts recellularized with Schwann-like cells: Preclinical trial. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2022;75:296-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.05.066
  87. 87. Jiang TM, Yang ZJ, Kong CZ, Zhang HT. Schwann-like cells can be induction from human nestin-positive amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology Animal. 2010;46:793-800. DOI: 10.1007/s11626-010-9335-x
  88. 88. Razavi S, Ahmadi N, Kazemi M, Mardani M, Esfandiari E. Efficient transdifferentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells into Schwann-like cells: A promise for treatment of demyelinating diseases. Advanced Biomedical Research. 2012;1:12. DOI: 10.4103/2277-9175.96067
  89. 89. Younesi E, Bayati V, Hashemitabar M, Azandeh SS, Bijannejad D, Bahreini A. Differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells into Schwann-like: Fetal bovine serum or human serum? Anatomy & Cell Biology. 2015;48:170-176. DOI: 10.5115/acb.2015.48.3.170
  90. 90. Halselbach D, Raffoul W, Larcher L, Tremp M, Kalbermatten DF, Summa PG. Regeneration patterns influence hindlimb automutilation after sciatic nerve repair using stem cells in rats. Neuroscience Letters. 2016;634:153-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.10.024
  91. 91. Xie S, Lu F, Han J, Tao K, Wang H, Simental A, et al. Efficient generation of functional Schwann cells from adipose-derived stem cells in defined conditions. Cell Cycle. 2017;16:841-851. DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2017.1304328
  92. 92. Fu XM, Wang Y, Fu WL, Liu DH, Zhang CY, Wang QL, et al. The combination of adipose-derived Schwann-like cells and acellular nerve allografts promotes sciatic nerve regeneration and repair through the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in rats. Neuroscience. 2019;422:134-145. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.10.018
  93. 93. Shea GKH, Tsui AYP, Chan YS, Shum DKY. Bone marrow-derived Schwann cells achieve fate commitment—A prerequisite for remyelination therapy. Experimental Neurology. 2010;224:448-458. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.05.005
  94. 94. Ao Q , Fung CK, Tsui AYP, Cai S, Zuo HC, Chan YS, et al. The regeneration of transected sciatic nerves of adult rats using chitosan nerve conduits seeded with bone marrow stromal cell-derived Schwann-cells. Biomaterials. 2011;32:787-796. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.09.046
  95. 95. Rosa MB, Sharma AD, Mallapragada SK, Sakaguchi DS. Transdifferentiation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)—Secreting mesenchymal stem cells significantly enhance BDNF secretion and Schwann cell marker proteins. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2017;124:572-582. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2017.05.014
  96. 96. Uz M, Büyüköz M, Sharma AD, Sakaguchi DS, Altinkaya SA, Mallapragada SK. Gelatin-based 3D conduits for transdifferentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into Schwann cell-like pehnotypes. Acta Biomaterialia. 2017;53:293-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.018
  97. 97. Mimura T, Dezawa M, Kanno H, Sawada H, Yamamoto I. Peripheral nerve regeneration by transplantation of bone marrow stromal cell-derived Schwann cells in adults rats. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2004;101:806-812. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.5.0806
  98. 98. Caddik J, Kingham PJ, Gardiner NJ, Wiberg M, Terenghi G. Phenotypic and functional characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells differentiated along a Schwann cell lineage. Glia. 2006;54:840-849. DOI: 10.1002/glia.20421
  99. 99. Lin WW, Chen X, Wang XD, Liu J, Gu XS. Adult rat bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into Schwann cell-like cells in vitro. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology Animal. 2008;44:31-40. DOI: 10.1007/s11626-007-9064-y
  100. 100. Radtke C, Schmitz B, Spies M, Kocsis JD, Vogt PM. Peripheral glial cell differentiation from neurospheres derived from adipose mesenchymal stem cells. International Journal of Development Neuroscience. 2009;27:817-823. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2009.08.006
  101. 101. Wei Y, Gong K, Zheng Z, Liu L, Wang A, Zhang L, et al. Schwann-like cell differentiation of rat adipose-derived stem cells by indirect co-culture with Schwann cells in vitro. Cell Proliferation. 2010;43:606-616. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2010.00710.x
  102. 102. Ladak A, Olson J, Tredget EE, Gordon T. Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells to support peripheral nerve regeneration in a rat model. Experimental Neurology. 2011;228:242-252. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.01.013
  103. 103. Wang X, Luo E, Li Y, Hu J. Schwann-like mesenchymal stem cells within vein graft facilitate facial nerve regeneration and remyelination. Brain Research. 2011;1383:71-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.01.098
  104. 104. Kaewkhaw R, Scutt AM, Haycock JW. Anatomical site influences the differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells for Schwann-cell phenotype and function. Glia. 2011;59:734-749. DOI: 10.1002/glia.21145
  105. 105. Sharma AD, Zbarska S, Petersen EM, Marti ME, Mallapragada SK, Sakaguchi DS. Oriented growth and transdifferentiation of mesenchymal stem cells towards a Schwann cell fate on micropatterned substrates. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2016;121:325-335. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2015.07.006
  106. 106. Najafabadi MM, Bayati V, Orazizadeh M, Hashmitabar M, Absalan F. Impact of cell density on differentiation efficiency of rat adipose-derived stem cells into Schwann-like cells. International Journal of Stem Cell. 2016;9:213-220. DOI: 10.15283/ijsc16031
  107. 107. Fu X, Tong Z, Li Q , Niu Q , Zhang Z, Tong X, et al. Induction of adipose-derived stem cells into Schwann-like cells and observation of Schwann-like cell proliferation. Molecular Medicine Reports. 2016;14:1187-1193. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2016.5367
  108. 108. Watanabe Y, Sasaki R, Matsumine H, Yamato M, Okano T. Undifferentiated and differentiated adipose-derived stem cells improve nerve regeneration in a rat model of facial nerve defect. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2017;11:362-374. DOI: 10.1002/term.1919
  109. 109. Ouasti S, Faroni A, Kingham PJ, Ghibaudi M, Reid AJ, Tirelli N. Hyaluronic acid (HA) receptors and the motility of Schwann cell(-like) phenotypes. Cells. 2020;9:1477. DOI: 10.3390/cells9061477
  110. 110. Li X, Dapeng L, Ping G, Quan Y, Zhen T. Neural differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells by indirect co-culture with Schwann cells. Archives of Biological Sciences. 2009;61:703-711. DOI: 10.2298/ABS0904703L
  111. 111. Liao D, Gong P, Li X, Tan Z, Yuan Q. Co-culture with Schwann cells is an effective way for adipose-derived stem cells neural transdifferentiation. Archives of Medical Sciences. 2010;6:145-151. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2010.13885
  112. 112. Montzka K, Lassonczyk N, Tschöke B, Neuss S, Führmann T, Franzen R, et al. Neural differentiation potential of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: Misleading marker gene expression. BMC Neuroscience. 2009;10:16. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-16
  113. 113. Razavi S, Esfahani HZ, Morshed M, Vaezifar S, Karbasi S, Golozar MA. Nanobiocomposite of poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/chitosan electrospun scaffold can promote proliferation and transdifferentiation of Schwann-like cells from human adipose-derived stem cells. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2015;103:2628-2634. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35398
  114. 114. Zarinfard G, Tadjalli M, Razavi S, Kazemi M. Effect of laminin on neurotrophic factors expression in Schwann-like cells induced from human adipose-derived stem cells in vivo. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience. 2016;60:465-473. DOI: 10.1007/s12031-016-0808-6
  115. 115. Costa HJZR, Bento RF, Salomone R, Nogueira DA, Zanatta DB, Costa MP, et al. Mesenchymal bone marrow stem cells within polyglycolic acid tube observed in vivo after six weeks enhance facial nerve regeneration. Brain Research. 2013;1510:10-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.03.025
  116. 116. Orbay H, Uysal AC, Hyakusoku H, Mizuno H. Differentiated and undifferentiated adipose-derived stem cells improve function in rats with peripheral nerve gaps. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2012;65:657-664. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.11.035
  117. 117. Brohlin M, Mahay D, Novikov LN, Tenenghi G, Wiberg M, Shawcross SG, et al. Characterisation of human mesenchymal stem cells following differentiation into Schwann cell-like cells. Neuroscience Research. 2009;64:41-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2009.01.010
  118. 118. Hassan NH, Sulong AF, Ng MH, Htwe O, Idrus RBH, Roohi S, et al. Neural-differentiated mesenchymal stem cells incorporated into muscle stuffed vein scaffold forms a stable living nerve conduit. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2012;30:1674-1681. DOI: 10.1002/jor.22102
  119. 119. Zaminy A, Shokrgozar MA, Sadeghi Y, Noroozian M, Heidari MH, Piryaei A. Mesenchymal stem cells as an alternative for Schwann cells in rat spinal cord injury. Iran Biomedical Journal. 2013;17:113-122. DOI: 10.6091/ibj.1121.2013
  120. 120. Razavi S, Mardani M, Kazemi M, Esfandiari E, Narimani M, Esmaeili A, et al. Effect of leucemia inhibitory fator on the myelinogenic ability of Schwann-like cells induced from human adipose-derived stem cells. Cell and Molecular Neurobiology. 2013;33:283-289. DOI: 10.1007/s10571-012-9895-2
  121. 121. Schuh CMAP, Morton TJ, Banerjee A, Grasl C, Schima H, Schmidhammer R, et al. Activated Schwann cell-like on aligned fibrin-poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) structures: A novel construct for application in peripheral nerve regeneration. Cells, Tissue, Organs. 2015;200:287-299. DOI: 10.1159/000437091
  122. 122. Liu Y, Chen J, Liu W, Lu X, Liu Z, Zhao X, et al. A modified approach to inducing bone marrow stromal cells to differentiate into cells with mature Schwann cell phenotypes. Stem Cells and Development. 2016;25:347-359. DOI: 10.1089/scd.2015.0295
  123. 123. Shimizu S, Kitada M, Ishikawa H, Itokazu Y, Wakao S, Dezawa M. Peripheral nerve regeneration by the in vitro differentiated-human bone marrow stromal cells with Schwann cell property. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2007;359:915-920. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.05.212
  124. 124. Peng J, Wang Y, Zhang L, Zhao B, Zhao Z, Chen J, et al. Human umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into a Schwann-cell phenotype and promote neurite outgrowth in vitro. Brain Research Bulletin. 2011;84:235-243. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.12.013
  125. 125. Matsuse D, Kitada M, Kohama M, Nishikawa K, Makinoshima H, Wakao S, et al. Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells differentiate into functional Schwann cells that sustain peripheral nerve regeneration. Journal of Neurophathology & Experimental Neurology. 2010;69:973-985. DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181eff6dc
  126. 126. Liu Z, Jin YQ , Chen L, Wang Y, Yang X, Cheng J, et al. Specific marker expression and cell state of Schwann cells during culture in vitro. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0123278. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123278
  127. 127. Hörner SJ, Couturier N, Gueiber DC, Hafner M, Rudolf R. Development and in vitro differentiation of Schwann cells. Cells. 2022;11:3753. DOI: 10.3390/cells11233753
  128. 128. Pan Y, Cai S. Current state of the development of mesenchymal stem cells into clinically applicable Schwann cell transplants. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 2012;368:127-135. DOI: 10.1007/s11010-012-1351-6
  129. 129. Tomita K, Madura T, Mantovani C, Terenghi G. Differentiated adipose-derived stem cells promote myelination and enhance functional recovery in a rat model of chronic denervation. Journal of Neuroscience Research. 2012;90:1392-1402. DOI: 10.1002/jnr.23002
  130. 130. Kingham PJ, Kolar MK, Novikova LN, Novikov LN, Wiberg M. Stimulating the neurotrophic and angiogenic properties of human adipose-derived stem cells enhances nerve repair. Stem Cells and Development. 2014;23:741-754. DOI: 10.1089/scd.2013.0396
  131. 131. Faroni A, Smith RJP, Lu L, Reid AJ. Human Schwann-like cells derived from adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells rapidly de-differentiate in the absence of stimulating medium. The European Journal of Neuroscience. 2016;43:417-430. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13055
  132. 132. di Summa PG, Kingham PJ, Raffoul W, Wiberg M, Terenghi G, Kalbermatten DF. Adipose-derived stem cells enhance peripheral nerve regeneration. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2010;63:1544-1552. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.09.012
  133. 133. di Summa PG, Kalbermatten DF, Pralong E, Raffoul W, Kingham PJ, Terenghi G. Long-term in vivo regeneration of peripheral nerves through bioengineered nerve grafts. Neuroscience. 2011;181:278-291. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.02.052
  134. 134. Georgiou M, Golding JP, Loughlin AJ, Kingham PJ, Phillips JB. Engineered neural tissue with aligned, differentiated adipose-derived stem cells promotes peripheral nerve regeneration across a critical sized defect in rat sciatic nerve. Biomaterials. 2015;37:242-251. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.009
  135. 135. Tomita K, Madura T, Sakai Y, Yano K, Terenghi G, Hosokawa K. Glial differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells: Implications for cell-based transplantation therapy. Neuroscience. 2013;236:55-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.066
  136. 136. Liau LL, Ruszymah BHI, Ng MH, Law JX. Characteristics and clinical applications of Wharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Current Research in Translational Medicine. 2020;68:5-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.retram.2019.09.001
  137. 137. Sibov TT, Severino P, Marti LC, Pavon LF, Oliveira DM, Tobo PR, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood: Parameters for isolation, characterization and adipogenic differentiation. Cytotechnology. 2012;64:511-521. DOI: 10.1007/s10616-012-9428-3
  138. 138. Lin YJ, Lee YW, Chang CW, Huang CC. 3D spheroids of umbilical cord blood MSC-derived Schwann cells promote peripheral nerve regeneration. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2020;8:604946. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.604946
  139. 139. Zhang C, Gong J, Zhang J, Zhu Z, Qian Y, Lu K, et al. Three potential elements of developing nerve guidance conduit for peripheral nerve regeneration. Adavanced Functional Materials. 2023;33:2302251. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202302251
  140. 140. Colen KL, Choi M, Chiu DTW. Nerve grafts and conduits. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2009;124:e386-e394. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bf8430
  141. 141. Moskow J, Ferrigno B, Mistry N, Jaiswal D, Bulsara K, Rudraiah S. Review: Bioengineering approach for the repair and regeneration of peripheral nerve. Bioactive Materials. 2019;4:107-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.09.001
  142. 142. Liu Y, Hsu SH. Biomaterials and neural regeneration. Neural Regeneration Research. 2020;15:1243-1244. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.272573
  143. 143. Gu X, Ding F, Williams DF. Neural tissue engineering options for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials. 2014;35:6143-6156. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.064
  144. 144. Soman SS, Vijayavenkataraman S. Perspectives on 3D bioprinting of peripheral nerve conduits. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21:5792. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21165792
  145. 145. Pedde RD, Mirani B, Navaei A, Styan T, Wong S, Mehrali M, et al. Emerging biofabrication strategies for engineering complex tissue constructs. Advanced Materials. 2017;29:1606061. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201606061
  146. 146. Zhu W, Tringale KR, Woller SA, You S, Johnson S, Shen H, et al. Rapid continuous 3D printing of customizable peripheral nerve guidance conduits. Materials Today. 2018;21:951-959. DOI: 1016/j.mattod.2018.04.001
  147. 147. Yang GH, Yeo M, Koo YW, Kim GH. 4D bioprinting: Technological advances in biofabrication. Macromolecular Bioscience. 2019;19:e1800441. DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201800441

Written By

Rogério Martins Amorim and Lucas Vinícius de Oliveira Ferreira

Submitted: 31 May 2024 Reviewed: 26 July 2024 Published: 08 September 2024