Open access peer-reviewed article

An Integrated Assessment of Spatial Variability Mapping of Surface Water Properties and its Impacts on Drinking Water in Mahanadi River Basin, Odisha, India

Abhijeet Das

This Article is part of Environmental Engineering/Green Technologies Section

Article metrics overview

70 Article Downloads

Article Type: Research Paper

Date of acceptance: July 2024

Date of publication: August 2024

DoI: 10.5772/geet.33

copyright: ©2024 The Author(s), Licensee IntechOpen, License: CC BY 4.0

Download for free

Table of contents


Introduction
Overview of study area
Sampling and data collection
Methodology
Results and discussion
Conclusion
Data availability
Competing interest
Author contributions
Acknowledgments

Abstract

Greater precision in models to aid in the prediction of drinking suitability of surface water is a novel concept that will benefit future studies in the target region, and the methods can be adapted to other locations. However, agricultural activities are the primary source of surface water pollution as a result of rising fertilizer and pesticide use. The Mahanadi River region in Odisha, India, is one such area where the use of fertilizers is causing the surface water quality (WQ) to deteriorate. The demand for precision in prediction models for assessing the suitability of surface water for drinking and irrigation is a growing focus that promises to enhance future studies and applications in various regimes. Hence, this study intends to identify and assess the sources of WQ contamination in the area using an entropy-based approach, self-organizing map (SOM) with cluster analysis, and weighted linear combination (WLC). The results were presented by employing overlay analysis using the inverse distance weighted (IDW) interpolation technique, due to their high accuracy in spatial analysis and ability to integrate various data types, which ensures comprehensive and reliable results. Most often, the IDW tool offer advanced visualization capabilities and user-friendly interfaces, making it ideal for creating detailed maps of surface water quality and drinking suitability. Twenty-one water samples were collected from 19 different locations to analyze the physicochemical parameters for a duration of 7 years (2016–2023). In the proposed area, the prominent cation trend was Fe2+ > B+, where Fe2+ is the primary cation. The predominant anion was arranged in the sequence Cl  > SO  > NO  > F, where chloride is the dominant anion. As per entropy classification, the entropy weightage values were computed to be in the range of 0.15 to 4, and the percentage of sites where surface water was not a good source of drinking were estimated to be 47.36%. In addition, IDW detected nine severely polluted zones within the study region with good accuracy. It is noticeable that the water showed higher values of TC, TKN, EC, TDS, Cl, and SO as compared to other indicators. Here, the water quality is poor due to runoff from nearby landfill dumps, fertilizer waste, or contamination from animal or human waste. In addition, to further ascertain and combine the known sources of ions found in surface water, SOM was performed for the hydrochemical data. The results exhibit three groups based on low, moderate, and high pollution zones. In this research field, comparing the ion concentrations that have been measured, five parameters each belong to Clusters I and II, while Cluster III contains about 10 parameters. Finally, three groups, suggested by SOM, point towards river bank erosion, water mineralization, and untreated sewage. It is clear from the WLC values that river-water quality ranges from low suitability to unsuitable class with the former varying from 0.5 to 154. Relatively lower values were recorded at sampling points P-(8), (9), and (19) in the river water, ascribed to the significant amount of human activity (anthropogenic), including sewage intake, trash dumping, and agricultural runoff. However, the analysis showed that in order to safeguard surface water sources from the dangers of contamination, nine areas require some level of surface water treatment prior to use. The outcomes of this study will hold significant worth for future research as it will reduce the duration and expenses of analysis through the utilization of the algorithms discussed here for predicting the suitability of surface water for drinking. The current study can be applied both locally and globally using similar methods. 

Keywords

  • agriculture

  • Mahanadi river

  • entropy

  • SOM

  • WLC

  • mineralization

  • sewage

  • anthropogenic

Author information

Introduction

Water is a resource that is necessary for all living things to survive. Thus, it is essential for human health, food security, and the environment. Surface water describes any body of liquid water that is present on Earth’s surface [1]. This includes rivers, lakes, and wetlands, which are the primary supply of water for residential, commercial, and industrial uses. As a result, they are the source of water for most needs, including those related to drinking, household use, research and industrial activities, agriculture and crop yields, floriculture, cattle breeding, and the strategic planning of aquatic life, including fish stocks and fisheries. However, overexploitation and inappropriate garbage disposal into surface water reservoirs are two examples of how anthropogenic activities are negatively affecting water availability and quality at an alarming rate [2]. A healthy river also has an impact on the aquatic ecology, humans, and animals that depend on the water for sustenance. River health is determined by water-quality indicators and the sources of that water. Current agricultural practices pose a major threat to human health, especially when it comes to the overuse of fertilizers, dirty conditions, and the dumping of sewage into surface water. Hence, water-quality status estimation is a challenging undertaking due to the abundance of potential physical, chemical, and biological indicators [3]. Researchers have conducted a great deal of study in support of maintaining and managing the quality of fresh surface water since water is essential to the sustainability of human civilization and the environment.

As a result, over the past 20 years, a significant amount of research has been conducted to profile the water quality for understanding the overall health of an ecosystem and the condition of surface water [4]. Optimizing the scale of use of these resources can be achieved by lowering the high cost of their production and application and by implementing suitable management techniques when utilizing the water resources that are currently available. The water quality index (WQI) method has gained popularity as an effective means of evaluating the impact of specific parameters on the total surface water quality (SWQ). Similarly, there is a defined limiting value for each water-quality parameter based on its intended use; samples that exceed this value are not appropriate for the intended use. The actual water sample from a river is made up of a constituent matrix, which is an accumulation of numerous water-quality indices [5]. Furthermore, it is not as simple to grade water-quality indicators because it is dependent on the relative toxicity rate and indicator concentration. Although it is a difficult process, the end result is a useful index value or number that can be used to relate the effects of the primary indicators in the constituent parameter matrix. The main drawback is that it raises questions about how even a slight alteration in weighting may impact how water quality is interpreted overall. Because of this, choosing appropriate weights for the various water-quality factors is a crucial step in the process.

To get around this problem, a large number of indices are created using a meaningful set of parameters, subindex values, and weights applied to the parameters [6]. Entropy-based weights have become a valuable method that leverages information entropy to provide water-quality criteria weights. This method is a group of correlation-based techniques that rely on analytical testing of the decision matrix to ascertain the existing data in the criteria used to calculate the weights of the criterion. The assessment of water quality and determination of precise correlations between the quality parameters and measuring locations have been conducted by multivariate statistical analysis (MSA). Numerous statistical formulations have been put forth previously, and each substitute index possesses some benefits and drawbacks [7]. Moreover, the challenge of assigning unknown samples and extracting important information from them becomes more difficult as the number of measurement parameter dimensions in samples increases [811]. Therefore, methods like self-organizing map (SOM) have also been extensively employed in the evaluation of SWQ due to their potent dimension reduction and classification capabilities. In addition, SOM is useful along with cluster analysis (CA) for analyzing intricate datasets. Effective river-water quality management requires evaluating the quality of water, determining the sources causing pollution, and comprehending the temporal and spatial fluctuations in the water quality that has been assessed [12].

Generally, these integrated methods often extract a limited number of components that capture significant patterns from complex multivariate data while minimizing information loss, and then display the result in a low-dimensional space. These methods use the Euclidean distance in conjunction with Ward’s approach to calculate a measure of similarity that yields intuitive relationships between each given sample and the full dataset, which can be represented by a tree diagram. Recently, the evaluation and routine monitoring of SWQ have been conducted by employing the geographic information system (GIS) model, combined with the inverse distance weighted (IDW) interpolation method, and has been shown to be an effective tool for assessing and analyzing geographic data related to water resources [13]. Moreover, IDW is broadly utilized to assess values at unfamiliar locations by relying on the available data points in the vicinity. It applies deterministic techniques that are most frequently used for multivariate interpolation, which utilizes the standard mixture of existing grid points to generate an unexpected grid value. It is a popular choice in the fields of spatial analysis and geostatistics to interpolate data points on a smooth surface. It can include both analytical and semi-empirical approaches for estimating and creating quantitative or qualitative water maps. This approach operates on the assumption that data points in close proximity to the target position exert greater impact on the predicted value than those that are far away. Thus, this is a technique that can be applied to quickly and cheaply turn huge datasets into a range of regional distribution maps and projections that illustrate the origins, patterns, and connections of pollutants [14]. Therefore, IDW has demonstrated superior performance in comparison to alternative methods that generate interpolation for the designated points with greater variability. Besides that, multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches like weighted linear combination (WLC) have generated noteworthy findings that necessitate a methodological synthesis for a thorough understanding of the management and monitoring of SWQ for practical application. This requires the use of the WLC approach in order to prioritize decisions during times of emergency and to provide an overall assessment of the sites based on both physical and chemical factors [811]. This further involves having the ability to collaborate and develop an integrated or combined strategy that, on the one hand, makes sense and is within the purview of the MCDM format and, on the other hand, receives good feedback. During the COVID-19 epidemic breakout, the use of clean water and proper sanitation was the first line of defense and prevention. Surface water is also an important source of freshwater, which was crucial to humanity’s fight for survival. To this end, comparative studies should highlight the various water elements and how they affect health.

It is important to state that no study has been undertaken within the present study area of making use of these tools in predicting water-quality suitability for surface water. Even so, in numerous studies, only the modeling of SWQ has been dealt with, and there has not been much research done on validating the models and procedures employed. Therefore, the experiment aimed to fill the gap in the available research and at integrating the entropy WQIs with MCDM, GIS, and MSA, by utilizing SOM and CA, in the prediction of water suitability in the investigated study.

Specifically, the objectives are as follows: (1) assess the physicochemical composition of surface water; (2) assess the drinking suitability of surface water; (3) determine the relationship within drinking parameters; (4) predict drinking indices using entropy, MCDM, and SOM models; (5) make adequate suggestions and recommendations based on the findings. Thus, in the current experiment, significant datasets collected during the course of a seven-year (2016–2023) monitoring study were subjected to CA, and SOM was used to collect implicit data regarding the parallels and divergences between the monitoring locations. Twenty-one water-quality parameters collected from the Mahanadi River (Odisha, India) in pre-monsoon were evaluated using WQI, WLC, and MSA.

It is asserted that this method is helpful in evaluating the SWQ of a region, particularly when there is a large amount of data because it considers the integration of geographic and temporal fluctuations in addition to the overall quality by measured variables and specific spots. Furthermore, creating more accurate predictive models that enable the prediction of suitability of water for drinking and agriculture is an innovative concept that will aid subsequent studies in the area and the techniques that can be adapted to accommodate other localities worldwide.

The framework of the study includes the following. Surface water samples were obtained and subjected to an evaluation of their physicochemical properties encompassing major ions and cations. The application of optimization tools and GIS enabled the creation of WQI maps, providing valuable information for both drinking and irrigation purposes. Furthermore, the examination of surface water chemistry was conducted through the utilization of entropy and an SOM diagram. The estimation of surface water contamination sources was facilitated through the application of WLC analysis.

Overview of study area

The river Mahanadi served as the study area. Mahanadi literally means “mighty river” or ‘great river’. This watershed is the people’s lifeblood in Chhattisgarh and Odisha. The location of this investigation lies between 19°30N and 22°30N latitude and 81°45E and 87°00E longitude at the chosen study site [811, 15]. Hydrographically, it is a major peninsular river that flows across the states of Chhattisgarh and Odisha with a total drainage area of 141,589 Km2 (approximately 4.28% of the entire land area of India). The river flows through the majority of the districts in the states of Chhattisgarh and Odisha; in the state of Jharkhand, it covers approximately 0.45% and finally, in the state of Maharashtra, it covers roughly 0.07%. In addition, its area is approximately 141,589 Km2 and it drains an area of about 65,580 km2 in Odisha [16]. It exhibits comparable flood susceptibility, and its riverbank area is among India’s most densely populated.

Additionally, it supplies water to about 38,606,665 people who depend on it for survival and basic needs. Approximately, 80% of this comes from the south-west monsoon that occurs from July to September. The basin is distinguished by a hot, tropical climate, with summer peak temperatures reaching 45 °C and winter low temperatures hovering around 30 °C [17]. Afterwards, an average of 140 cm of precipitation is predicted for this river each year. This river is constantly filled with stagnant water from January to May of each year, which contributes to the buildup of pollutants in the surrounding area. The Eastern Ghats Mountain ranges also have a big impact on the pattern of rainfall in the area. The primary crops that are grown in this river basin are oilseeds, sugarcane, and rice. Therefore, the two primary land uses in the basin are agriculture and forestry, which are backed by extensive irrigation infrastructure created by major- and medium-sized projects [18]. The transportation network in the district of Cuttack is reliable and facilitates the interchange of these crops through the neighboring towns and cities. The local farmers who cultivate crops for sale in and around cities or towns as their primary source of income benefit from this exchange [19]. However, the amount of irrigation extraction per person in this river channel is approximately 686 m3, and it is estimated that there are 1.85 million hectares of net irrigated land in this river region. The Mahanadi basin is separated into three smaller regions, namely, the upper catchment constitutes about 21.34% of the cumulative area, 37.16% belongs to the middle region, and lower Mahanadi contains an area approximately 41.5%. Thus, the lower basin typically encompasses an area of approximately 57960 Km2. Regarding this, a few features of the sampling locations are displayed in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Hydrographical setting of the Mahanadi basin and monitoring locations.

Sampling and data collection

The present study follows a systematic sampling design framed to portray the nature of surface water (river) suitability for drinking purposes in the river basin. The State Pollution Control Board, Odisha, provided the data for 19 water-quality monitoring sites, which included 40 water-quality parameters tracked monthly during a 7-year period (2016–2023) using a judgmental sampling technique to better reflect the hydrochemical parameters of water samples. To be employed in the current research, 21 of these 40 parameters were chosen based on their sampling continuity at each of the chosen monitoring locations. It should be highlighted that each experimental procedure and sample collection, preservation, and management received particular care throughout the evaluation period [811, 20]. Notably, sampling was conducted specifically during the dry season, characterized by reduced water levels, elevated cation concentrations, and increased stability of anions. An extensive evaluation of the following physicochemical parameters was conducted: temperature, pH, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), dissolved oxygen (DO), total dissolved solids (TDS), alkalinity, chloride (Cl), sulfate (SO), coliform/total coliform (TC), iron (Fe2+), fluoride (F), boron (B+), total hardness (TH), total suspended solids (TSS), electrical conductivity (EC), chemical oxygen demand (COD), NH3–N (ammoniacal nitrogen), free ammonia (free NH3), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), and total hardness (TH). Pre-calibration was performed on each instrument in accordance with the standards of practice before starting tests.

Subsequently, water-quality indicators such as temperature, EC, pH, TSS, and TDS were calculated at the sampling spots (model HQ40d, Hach, Co, USA), while F and SO concentrations were determined using the nephelometric method and were measured using a UV–visible colorimeter at 650 nm (model Jenway 6405). A handheld Global Positioning System was used to record the geographic position of each sampling point (eTrex 20, Garmin). Parameters like DO were estimated using a multiparametric probe with calibrated sensors during field measurement. The concentration of Cl was determined using Mohr’s method. The most probable number (MPN) method was used to determine the count of coliform bacteria in the water sample. In the laboratory, COD was analyzed through permanganate titration, and BOD was measured via the reduction of DO in the raw water samples after 5 days. Moreover, alkalinity and TH were tested using the complexometric method with EDTA titration. Then, NH4–N was measured through Nessler’s reagent spectrophotometry, while free NH3 and TKN were analyzed through distillation using a distillation apparatus (UDK 129 Kjeldahl distillation unit, Velp Scientifica). Ion-selective electrode techniques (model Orion 9796 BNOP, ThermoFisher Scientific) were used to analyze nitrate (NO). Two metals in all, namely Fe2+ and B+, were investigated by ion chromatography.

The average of all replicate measurements within a relative standard deviation of ±2.2% has been reported in this study. Regarding quality control and quality assurance, to maintain accuracy and precision in observations, all analytical equipment was pre-calibrated using standard solutions or in accordance with the company’s specifications [21]. According to the principle of electroneutrality, the concentrations of cations (positive ions) and anions (negative ions) must be equal, which is popularly known as ion balancing. Regarding the validation of surface water, ion balancing is an important tool. The accuracy of the laboratory analysis has been validated by charge balance error (%CBE) assessment computed using Equation (1). The observed CBE falls within the acceptable limit of ±5%:

In the study area, statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25 on a dataset comprising 21 physicochemical parameters, which were then subjected to SOM and CA analysis. The spatial distribution maps of various physicochemical parameters were generated using GIS techniques and contouring methods with ArcGIS 10.6. The spatial distribution maps for each parameter were prepared utilizing IDW interpolation techniques to illustrate variations across the study area. Furthermore, the model’s maps were elaborated upon based on these spatial distribution maps.

Methodology

The SOM and CA were used to categorize the samples of surface water. In order to determine the causes of pollution, the grading implications of surface water samples and the variation in ion concentration for every water specimen were acquired to obtain the desired result. The water sample scores for water quality were then calculated statistically by applying the entropy approach to compute the WQ score of each water sample. The WQ examination and its estimation from pollutant sources were thus completed using the entropy approach in conjunction with the SOM and CA data. Therefore, for determining relative weights, an entropy-based approach has been utilized, which captures the degree of disorder and randomness in the data. The versatility of this approach has led to their widespread adoption across diverse domains, including image and speech recognition, natural language processing, financial forecasting, and medical diagnosis. Thus, their capability to handle intricate, non-linear relationships within data renders them invaluable tools for addressing complex real-world challenges. So, it acts as a intelligence research progresses, SOM continue to drive innovation, powering intelligent system that enhance operational efficiency, accuracy, and decision-making across various fields [22]. 

Hence, based on Shannon’s information theory, depending on the distribution of the data, the significance of the relative intensities (weights) of the criterion is interpreted [23]. This technique functions with the assumption that assigning a a greater weight to data appears to be more useful than a lower weight to data. Thus, it is a productive method for presenting probability and uncertainty [24]. The most significant advantage is that because human intervention has been eliminated, it produces trustworthy results from the weight allocations (Si) to parameters. To determine the relative weights of WQ data with several samples, the algorithm of this technique can be presented in the form of a flow chart as in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The conceptual entropy model.

This article has covered conventional entropy mathematical approaches, which can be used to approximate all types of water samples. Nevertheless, there are a few processes involved in calculating the final result. Because of this, chemometrics can be advantageous based on the statistical multivariate technique known as SOM. This approach is an algorithm for unsupervised neural networks developed by Kohonen [25]. The Kohonen map or an SOM algorithm is the most widely used artificial intelligence model. They create two-dimensional maps using unsupervised learning and combine the objectives of clustering and projection methods [26]. Based on the similarity of the data, this map may present complex, high-dimensional data in a consistently organized, low-dimensional format.

Consequently, it is a successful linear dimensionality reduction technique that is frequently applied in classification and data mining [27]. It functions as a model for searching and visualizing linear and nonlinear relationships found in datasets. The input layer and the output layer are its two constituent layers [28]. One of the primary objectives of the SOM approach is that hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) is utilized with Ward’s linkage to obtain instructive and explanatory reference vectors, also termed weight, prototype, and codebook vectors. At present, these models are employed by various academics for modeling purposes and to investigate a broad range of hydrological issues, particularly in the areas of rock geochemistry and hyperspectral imaging [29]. Furthermore, this mechanism is highly suited for processing ecological data since it is based on unsupervised learning, which eliminates the need for prior information. These techniques can therefore replicate more accurate patterns and correlations between input and output parameters, and they are very good at extracting response data from the challenging objective [30]. Conversely, in hydrological models, it can be utilized to simulate both regression and classification. Therefore, coupling SOM and CA with GIS is suggested for simulating the surface water to search for vulnerable zones based on similarity, which decreases costs and time [31]. This makes it possible to zoom in on areas with a respectable degree of precision, and it can quickly communicate the findings in cluster-map style to all users, researchers, and managers. The steps for the application of SOM with entropy are illustrated in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Flow chart describing SOM approach for calculating the performance scores for SWQ simulation.

On the other hand, WLC has been shown to be a useful technique for managing data when there is a significant degree of collinearity and noise in the input variable data and a large number of output variables. Hence, SOM was investigated as a substitute method for predicting indices in this field of study since it is quick, easy, and only requires a few steps to compute—especially for the WQIs. This improves on the current standard WQIs, resolves conflicts among several WQIs, and aids in online monitoring system optimization to increase the data obtained via the optimization technique [32]. Integrating WLC and GIS is a useful and reasonably priced method for handling geographic data. For many years, researchers have weighted various thematic layers to determine WQ zones using the WLC approach. When there is insufficient data for analysis, splitting up several substitutions into pairwise comparisons and merging the results is suggested. This gives rise to a mathematical framework that addresses ambiguity and uncertainty by admitting that statements may be partially true or incorrect and enabling the mathematical description of varying degrees of truth. Furthermore, this approach presents a state-of-the-art workspace for spatiotemporal data management, and analysis, integration, and visualization of digital spatial data from several sources.

Additionally, it integrates with GIS, which supports surface water management planning and decision-making through spatial analysis, modification, and visualization. This combination creates a flexible and user-friendly program. In a nutshell, after the obtained data has been normalized, this model may produce accurate ratings for survey sites. It also analyses the decision-making process to comprehend the influence of uncertainties, which are a frequent characteristic of water management issues. The steps to compute the final ranking are shown in Figure 4. Using ArcGIS software, the surface water potential map was produced by superimposing all of the criteria maps and applying the WLC technique in order to estimate the final score. The highest absolute value shows the best possible choice. Thus, when sorting the WLC data into groups, if the factor is less than zero, it shows unsuitable class; 0 to 112 signifies low suitability; 112–124 is moderately suitable; 124–133 indicates suitable class; between 133 and 154 is the highly suitable zone. In fine, this was adopted to identify pollution using physicochemical parameters so that the extent of pollution could be ascertained.

Figure 4.

A WLC diagram showing the classification to compute final score (Si).

Results and discussion

The findings from the statistical analysis of the surface water sample data during pre-monsoon are compared with that of the World Health Organization [33].

Physicochemical parameters

While physically examining water samples, the temperature is an additional field-measured parameter that is often expressed in degree Celsius. It is therefore crucial for measuring water for irrigation and consumption. In this work, the temperature ranges from 25.72 °C to 30.36 °C over the different sampling stations on the river. The most vital parameter pH indicates the amount of H+ ions in water and it symbolizes the basic or acidic qualities of water. It has been noted that WQ is significantly influenced by the amount of organic molecules, the water temperature, and the photosynthetic activity of aquatic plants. In the present work, the value ranges from 7.741–7.913 mg/l, signifying the slightly alkaline nature. This range is typical of soil and water bodies influenced by natural processes and anthropogenic activities. Likewise, another indicator, namely, DO, is used to describe the amount of dissolved O2 in river water. It is an essential water-quality criterion that allows one to ascertain the water’s freshness. It depends on a lot of factors, including temperature, the extent of pollution, wind, photosynthetic activity, and the respiration mechanism of the organism. It also varies on a daily, seasonal, and temperature-related basis. In this work, its value spans from 7.257 to 7.812 mg/l. In almost all stations, DO exhibits higher than the acceptable limit (6.0 mg/l) for potable water. The trend thereafter indicates an increase in DO levels in the current study, indicating extremely low population density in the area. An increased BOD value in a water sample indicates an increased level of organic pollution. Low BOD content implies that there is less organic material in the water for bacteria to oxidize. Its readings in the research study fluctuate from 1.095 to 2.389 mg/l, that is, generally, less than 5 mg/l as per World Health Organization (WHO) standards for all sites. This low value of BOD suggests that there is less organic content for bacteria to oxidize in the water sample. During the study period, the TC value fluctuates from 1219 to 42,530 MPN/100 ml, suggesting that all stations are within the prescribed limits (>5000), with the exception of P-(8), (9), and (19), which have readings higher than the threshold limits. It is noted that water pollution is typically another factor contributing to the high numbers of coliforms in water. It is observed that summer is the most risky season for this infection since bacteria grow and multiply at higher temperatures.

Another parameter, namely, TSS, is a crucial indicator of water quality that is frequently used to determine whether water is suitable for irrigation and drinking. Its increased value in surface water may have an impact on those with heart and kidney problems. The concentration varies from 28.62 to 74.88 mg/l in the current investigation. It is noted from the results that the reported readings of TSS in the river water are in the desirable limit of 100 mg/l. Alkalinity contributes to the water’s ability to act as a buffer, keeping its pH stable. The main source is dissolved CO2, which is present in high amounts in a greater part of water sources. It was found in the range of 70.398–100.88 mg/l, which lies within an acceptable value range, 200 mg/l. It is seen that water at P-(9) was relatively more alkaline than other stations, which may be due to the additional presence of salts. The parameter COD generally indicates the presence of a “potent chemical oxidant”; it denotes the quantity of oxygen required for the effectiveness of the chemical oxidation of reduced inorganic compounds and organic materials. This is helpful in locating hazardous areas and organic compounds that are not easily broken down by cellular mechanisms. In the study period, the value ranges between 6.75 and 21.87 mg/l, which is below the permitted range of 30 mg/l. Recently, NH4–N and free NH3 have been the most prevalent contaminants in water and can sometimes be viewed as an indicator of soil water movement. Due to its harmful effects on the environment such as eutrophication in lakes and rivers and especially human health, which causes newborns to develop methemoglobinemia, its contamination of surface water has become a global issue. The reported findings of NH3–N and free NH3 range from 0.511 to 1.928 and 0.021 to 0.059 mg/l, respectively. The recommended limit for drinking water should be 2 mg/l [33]. The TKN levels in the studied region range between 3.279 and 11.791 mg/l despite the fact that its readings should not cross the threshold mark of 5 mg/l as per WHO criteria. The research area’s elevated TKN concentrations have been found to be mostly caused by anthropogenic factors, including sewage backups, leaking septic tanks, inappropriate home waste disposal, animal and human waste kept near wells, and the use of pesticides and fertilizers on croplands. The parameter EC indicates the amount of ionized compounds present in water, and it is a reliable indicator of salinity. A low value suggests the presence of a smaller number of ions, making the water suitable to drink. Higher EC values signify a high level of mineralization in water as a result of human and geological activity. Besides that, the EC aids in assessing soil salinity, nutrient levels, and irrigation water quality for optimal crop production. Its vital for water quality evaluation, pollution detection, and aquatic ecosystem health monitoring, particularly in aquaculture. In terms of results, the values in the present investigation span from 138.11 to 7779.342, and they are below the threshold criteria suggested by WHO, namely, 2250 𝜇S/cm, except one site. Elevated levels are probably caused by soil leaching, home wastewater discharges, and trash discharges. They may also be related to the amount of organic matter present.

Excessive sodium can lead to soil salinity issues, affecting plant growth and water infiltration, highlighting the need for careful management. However, agricultural water typically adds to the exchange of cations in the soil; however, in calculations, the SAR indicator helps tremendously in the chosen study. In principle, if the water utilized for irrigation becomes richer in Na+ and depleted in Ca2+, the ion exchange can be possibly overloaded in Na+ and disperse clay particles, destroying the soil’s structure. In this work, the computed values range from 0.412 to 16.589 mg/l. The upper limit for human consumption is taken approximately as 10 mg/L. The water with the SAR value high at one site holds a high TKN value, and the water-irrigated ground becomes unusable as a result of the breakdown of NaHCO3. Moreover, increased TDS concentrations irritate human gastrointestinal tracts and may have laxative effects. From the investigative work, it has been estimated that the TDS concentration is found to be high at P-(9) and (19). It also highlights that TDS values at each of the sampling station are within the permissible limit (WHO, 100 mg/l). Hence, significant precipitation that may exceed its conveyance capability is the cause of higher TDS. Water TH is computed using cation (Ca and Mg) and anion (HCO, Cl, and SO) concentrations. High hardness is generally not a good property since it can lead to scaling or lime buildup in thermostats and pipes, which eventually reduces the effectiveness of water heaters and the lathering of soap. It is noted that the observed values vary in the range of 51.18–2194.90. Based on WHO standards [33], the highest permitted threshold is taken as 300 mg/l. On the basis of these findings, the area is believed to be within the TH limit, which clearly indicates safety for human drinking activities except P-(9). Thus, location 9 was observed to have higher values sometimes, which is caused by weathering and carbonate minerals. When its value is above the permitted limit, it causes boiler and pot scaling as well as renal failure in people.

Major ions

In the current investigation, the hierarchy of cations in the studied region is found to be Fe2+  > B+ and that of anions is Cl  > SO  > NO  > F. An effective measure of urban wastewater pollution in rivers is the activity of B+ in water, which frequently suggests that the decomposition of biological material is not yet complete. This element enters water systems via a variety of sources, such as manure, sewage, and other chemical fertilizers applied to fields of crops. The measurements are within the limit of 2 mg/l recommended by WHO, fluctuating between 0.03 and 0.55 mg/l. Then, the most significant issue with drinking water in rural areas is the presence of Fe2+, which helps transport oxygen in the blood. However, in high concentrations, it can result in DNA damage, exhaustion, hemochromatosis, joint discomfort, stomach issues, vomiting, and weight loss. During the study phase, the iron parameter spanned from 0.59 to 2.609 mg/l. This value falls well within the acceptable threshold of 1 mg/l. Usually, Cl in drinking water comes from fertilizers, saline intrusion, sewage and industrial effluents, and natural sources. The acceptable value of Cl is 250 mg/l based on WHO guidelines. In the present study, its concentration ranges from 9.648 to 4904.88 mg/L, and its values remain below the maximum allowable level at all sampling locations except at P-(9). The greater concentration at the P-(9) site is owing to the area’s geological characteristics, agricultural runoff, and wastewater from households and workplaces. This indicates a significant presence of chloride ions in the water, likely originating from sources such as dissolution of salts, sea water intrusion, or anthropogenic activities. In sum, implementing strategies such as leaching and soil amendments is crucial for mitigating chloride-related challenges and ensuring sustainable agricultural productivity.

The sources of SO in rocks are sulfur-containing minerals, heavy metal sulfides that are frequently found in metasedimentary rocks, limestone and anhydrite in continental crust, volcanic and biochemical process input, and human economic activity. The quantity of sulfate in the study area varies from 4.97 to 376.07 mg/L, whereas the WHO permissible limit is 200 mg/l. The study area exhibits high agriculture-driven activity, which may be linked to the increase in concentration at P-(9). Thus, effective management of sulphate levels through appropriate agricultural practices is crucial for maximizing crop yields and quality, while minimizing environmental impacts. Subsequently, F migrates with moving water, much like other ions, and is eventually strengthened by evaporation. Its high value is linked to illnesses such urinary tract infections, mental impairment in children, lower fertility, and injury to the human nervous system. The quantity of F concentration in the present study is found to be 0.258–1.0 mg/l. At all sites, the concentrations are within the WHO allowable limit, and the water can be utilized for drinking after a disinfection step. Nutrients like NO enter water bodies via point- and nonpoint-source pollution. Furthermore, the consumption of high-nitrate water can cause blue-baby disease (methemoglobinemia) in infants by lowering the blood’s ability to carry oxygen. This could be because nitrate is reduced to nitrite, which then combines with blood hemoglobin to generate methemoglobin. The results from the current region reveal that its values fluctuate between 1.289 and 2.689 mg/l. At all sites, the levels are within the safe limit of 45 mg/l. Overall, effective management of surface water is essential for ensuring safe drinking water and maintaining drinking water and agricultural productivity. Thus, in this current research, Figure 5a–t) provides a comprehensive view of the geospatial maps of all the water-quality metrics along the river stretch.

Figure 5.

Geospatial classification diagram illustrating the parameters: (a) pH, (b) DO, (c) BOD, (d) TC, (e) TSS, (f) alkalinity, (g) COD, (h) NH3–N, (i) free NH3, (j) TKN, (k) EC, (l) SAR, (m) B+, (n) TDS, (o) TH, (p) Cl, (q) SO, (r) F, (s) NO, and (t) Fe2+.

Figure 5 (Continued).

Figure 5 (Continued).

Figure 5 (Continued).

While conducting more analysis, it is simple to determine the sampling locations’ relative pollution levels in relation to the drinking-water-quality standards with the aid of an entropy approach. This can function as a substitute method for predicting indices in this research area because it is quick, easy to use, and only requires a few steps to calculate the WQIs. It suggests that the factors that have the biggest impact on overall quality are those with the highest entropy weight and the lowest entropy value. By reducing the relative inaccuracy that arises when the artificial weights are disregarded, it estimates the WQI. These entropy values for individual location, as per WHO drinking-water quality guidelines, are presented in Table 1. In a further study on the concerned area, the entropy ranges from 0.15 to 4, categorized as better to worst WQ, as depicted in Figure 6a. Approximately, 31.57% of the test locations exhibit better conditions and 15.78% good conditions. Furthermore, 5.263% show medium water zone, 42.105% exhibit poor conditions, and 5.263% of the test locations (one location) point towards worst water conditions. Besides that, the criteria with the greatest entropy weights have the biggest effects on the grading of water quality. However, according to entropy grading, it appears that the TH parameter with a weight of 0.035 has the lowest impact, and the TC and TKN parameters with weights of 1.32 and 1.1, respectively, have the largest impact. Based on the results of entropy analysis (Figure 6b), it is revealed that a significant proportion of the area has the grading of better to good (52.63%), apart from sites (2), (7)–(12), and (19), from the perspective of the stations’ condition. This clearly serves as an example of both organic and inorganic pollution that comes from human sources, including water treatment facilities, untreated municipal sewage discharge, and domestic wastewater. Additionally, mixing processes indicate the blending of water from different sources of aquifers, resulting in variations in ion concentrations. Moreover, the occurence of reverse ion exchange highlights the exchange of ions between the surface water and solid phases in the aquifer matrix, altering the water chemistry. These findings underscore the dynamic nature of hydrogeochemical processes is crucial for managing surface water resources effectively and ensuring water quality for various uses, including drinking water supply and agricultural irrigation.

Site number (P)Score (Si)Grade
1 0.15Better
2 0.59Bad
3 0.18Better
4 0.24Better
5 0.21Better
6 0.51General
7 0.59Bad
8 0.67Bad
9 4Worse
10 0.61Bad
11 0.62Bad
12 0.58Bad
13 0.57Bad
14 0.34Good
15 0.31Good
16 0.15Better
17 0.18Better
18 0.28Good
19 0.66Bad

Table 1

Evaluation of sampling points using entropy approach.

Figure 6.

(a, b) Entropy mechanism controlling water chemistry in the study area.

Addressing the computation of entropy, it should be mentioned that even with the use of this index, the relative weight and lower quality of each variable in the WQI grade are incomprehensible. Nonetheless, all parameters in SOM computations may have a greater impact on WQI grading if they are given a normalized weight. From Table 2, SOM can be described as a powerful data mining method that may identify patterns in homogeneous groups or case clusters. Thus, based on the results (Figure 7a), Cluster I includes five parameters: pH, BOD, TC, alkalinity, and nitrate. Cluster II includes DO, COD, NH4–N, F, and free NH3. Cluster III comprises TSS, Fe2+, TKN, EC, TDS, Cl, SO, SAR, TH, and B. The origin of Cluster I would account for the biodegradation of organic waste, taking into account contributions from industrial, agricultural, and household sources as well as fecal contamination. In the case of Cluster II, the degradation of related tributaries is mostly caused by human activities, excreta, wastewater, household trash, and farming fertilizers from nearby areas. These factors also contribute to the deterioration of drinking water. Cluster III results point towards river bank erosion, water mineralization, and mainly untreated sewage in large cities, indicating illegal discharges or ongoing sewer leaks. Figure 7(b) displays the CA of the sample locations in a dendrogram. The CA makes use of 19 sampling sites to form three clusters, along with the survey points for each cluster. The details are as follows. Cluster I consists of 10 sampling points: P-(3)–(7) and (14)–(18)). Cluster II comprises five locations: P-(1), (2), and (10)–(12). The good results from Cluster I (10 locations) make up the majority from all the 19 monitoring locations, which might save 52.63% on monitoring expenses. Hence, this cluster is listed as a low pollution zone. In Cluster II, the places demonstrate moderate water quality, which are due to the effects of landfills and agricultural development; areas with high water quality were less affected by these sources of pollution. Therefore, this cluster belongs to a moderate pollution zone. Cluster III is composed of four sampling locations: P-(8), (9), (13), and (19). Because all samples have poor quality of water, this cluster is considered a highly polluted zone. The results from this group led to the conclusion that an essential mineral and organic load with anthropogenic origins from metropolitan areas caused the deterioration of water quality. Additionally, it has been alleged that untreated sewage wastes are dumped into the river, which could be the principal cause of pollution in the area around it. The overall SOM results demonstrated that the dynamics of river chemistry and discharge are primarily determined by human activity along the shore of the watershed, its elevation, and the whole river system’s shape. As a result, they significantly strain the aquatic ecology.

Figure 7.

(a, b) Dendrogram showing cluster grouping based on SOM technique.

Ionizing ionsWeightRankCluster ICluster IICluster III
pH 0.072 12 0.98 0.43 0.54
DO 0.096 11 0.45 0.96 0.28
BOD 0.063 13 0.95 0.46 0.42
TC 1.3201 0.91 0.53 0.35
TSS 0.8207 0.51 0.61 0.89
Alkalinity 0.056 15 0.95 0.24 0.27
COD 0.051 17 0.62 0.953 0.51
NH3–N 0.055 16 0.23 0.92 0.45
Free NH3 0.058 14 0.12 0.89 0.52
TKN 1.1002 0.17 0.12 0.92
EC 0.9803 0.43 0.32 0.95
SAR 0.670 10 0.23 0.12 0.9
B 0.033 20 0.43 0.51 0.86
TDS 0.9404 0.26 0.34 0.87
TH 0.035 19 0.49 0.29 0.93
Cl 0.8905 0.31 0.41 0.88
SO0.86060.250.120.97
F 0.043 18 0.35 0.85 0.58
NO0.78090.990.540.59
Fe2+ 0.8108 0.14 0.37 0.97

Table 2

Average concentration of Clusters I–III calculated by the entropy and SOM method.

It was evident that both entropy and SOM are able to identify commonalities among the variables. However, WLC makes it easier to divide the sampling sites into water-quality classes. The capability of WLC to identify similar groups renders it an appropriate technique for interpreting extensive and nonlinear hydrogeochemical datasets. Rough set theory is used in this technique to produce a trustworthy analysis from various parameter weights. The method is based on entropy and SOM weights. The reported values of WLC in the current work vary in the range of 0.5 to 154, suggesting a low suitable to unsuitable category. According to this classification (Figure 8a), 10.53% (n = 2) of samples fall into low suitable category; 31.58% containing six samples form the moderate category; 52.63% (n = 10) of specimens belong to the highly suitable category, which makes the water safe for human intake. Furthermore, 5.26% (n = 1) of samples belong to the unsuitable category, and this implies that since the capacity of treatment plants is smaller than the volume of sewage generated in cities, residential sewage from these locations is dumped into the river. The findings pointed out sampling sites P-(8), (9), and (19) as the hotspot zones for the declining quality of the river water. Moreover, water-quality assessment suggests that more than 15% of samples are unsuitable for drinking due to the higher coliform count and greater amount of salinity, nitrogen, and other constituents. The spatial variability is shown in Figure 8b. It is also accompanied by high values of TKN and EC. In addition, places like P-9 (SI = 0.5) are situated in the zone of heavy pollution, with the overall rank of 1, on account of higher concentrations of variables, namely, SO, EC, TDS, SAR, Cl, TH, TKN, and TC, which are likewise the highest among all the areas and greater than their desired concentrations. This fact also suggests that anthropogenic pressure is increasing towards the end of the observation period, most likely due to the region’s growing tourism industry. As a result, by taking into account all significant factors and allocating weight based on their variability, it often serves as a methodology for assessing the water quality scientifically.

Figure 8.

(a, b) WLC map in pre-monsoon across all sampling sites.

Conclusion

The combination of Geographical Information System (GIS), Weighted Linear Combination (WLC), and Self-Organizing Map (SOM) models offers valuable insights into predicting the suitability of surface water for drinking in Mahanadi River Basin, Odisha. In the current work, the spatial distribution of the WQ pattern and its distribution over pre-monsoon was investigated using entropy, SOM, WLC, and GIS over a period of 7 years, with quality data from 19 water gauge stations of the Mahanadi basin. To examine the dispersion of main ions in the research area, GIS-based spatial analysis and the IDW interpolation approach were used. In further assessment of the water quality, the computed entropy readings range between 0.15 and 4, demonstrating that the river water is suitable for use only after treatment. The TC values also exhibit higher readings across the survey stations, whereas the NH3 and alkalinity values are firmly within permissible limits. Hence, high TKN values can be linked to the rise in PO limits, which consequently elevates the river’s nutrient/eutrophication load. This is because of nutrient enrichment, which causes a rise in algal blooms. Further, this outcomes of the study showed a significant presence of chloride, TKN, coliform in the water, likely originating from sources such as dissolution of salts, sea-water intrusion, or anthropogenic activities. Approximately, 47.36% (n = 9) of locations demonstrate bad–worst WQ, which is mainly attributed to the direct disposal of stored and municipal garbage into rivers. Additionally, the presence of mineral dissolution suggests the dissolution of minerals from geological formations, contributing to the chemical composition of surface water. Also, mixing processes indicate the blending of water from different sources or aquifers, resulting in variations in ion concentrations. Hence, this index establishes that the river water is unfit for human consumption and household use at nine sites, and the water should be consumed only after proper treatment and disinfection. Furthermore, an SOM was also generated with the HCA via Ward’s linkage to have a deeper comprehension of water suitability throughout the study area. The subcategories of the WQ reviewed by SOM values are based on or rely on the majority of the research field that falls under three categories, namely, low, moderate, and high pollution. It comprises 5 parameters and 10 locations in Cluster I while in Cluster II, it contains five indicators and locations. Finally, 10 indicators and 4 stations are included in Cluster III. This shows that greater concentrations are seen along the river’s flow, which could be caused by home wastewater systems or sewage infiltration. In addition, the MCDM technique, namely, WLC has been incorporated into the work, which acts as a practical and effective instrument to compile and report monitoring data to decision makers so that they can comprehend the SWQ’s current state and have the opportunity to apply it more successfully in the future. The observed range is found to be 0.5–154. In fine, the value of 0.5 that was measured at station P-(9) is found to be the lowest, which indicates an unsuitable WQ zone. The WLC values of stations (2), (8), (10), and (19) are 115, 110, 117, and 100, respectively, which indicates low–moderate suitable WQ. The general suitable WLC value for the river is 52.63%, indicating that the water is suitable for drinking. Some stations show unsuitable/moderate WQ, and this could be caused by a variety of anthropogenic activities and natural phenomena that take place alongside the river. Therefore, the proposed study uses a comprehensive strategy towards SWQ monitoring and healthy management of water resources. The present study is limited to the effective identification and integration of criteria, which helps determine the suitability of surface water recharge sites and integrate them with the actual site. Thus, this approach can also be adapted to target water-starved locations where surface water degradation is an increasing concern. In these areas, artificial recharge techniques can be used with minor site-specific alterations. Therefore, the study advocates for integrating these advanced modelling approaches to enhance efficiency and  reduce analysis time and costs. However, variability in model performance across datasets and the need for robust training data remain challenges. The specific limitations of this study are to: (a)  Hydrogeochemical parameters can exhibit temporal fluctuations influenced by seasonal changes, anthropogenic activities, and climatic variations, which were not fully explored due to the study's duration, (b) Availability of comprehensive historical data on hydrogeochemical parameters could enhance long-term trend analysis and improve predictive modeling accuracy, but such data may not have been readily accessible or uniformly available, (c) The machine learning models utilized assume stationarity and linearity within the dataset, which may not fully capture nonlinear relationships or abrupt changes in water quality dynamics over time, and (d) Field sampling limitations, such as accessibility to certain locations or constraints in sampling frequency, could influence the representativeness of water quality assessments across the study area. Keeping this in mind, the major recommendations of this study are to: (1) Implement comprehensive, ongoing monitoring programs to track hydrogeochemical parameters across diverse geographical locations and over extended periods. This will provide a robust dataset for understanding temporal variations and trends in groundwater quality, (2) Expand the spatial coverage of groundwater quality assessments to encompass regions with varying hydrogeological characteristics. This approach will facilitate comparative analyses and improve the applicability of findings to broader environmental contexts, (3) Foster partnerships with local communities, governmental agencies, and agricultural stakeholders to promote awareness of groundwater quality issues and implement adaptive management strategies tailored to regional needs, (4) Further explore advanced machine learning models, such as deep learning algorithms and ensemble methods, to enhance  variables, and (5) Advocate for the adoption of climate-resilient agricultural practices that mitigate the impacts of groundwater salinity and alkali risks on soil health and crop productivity. This includes precision irrigation techniques and soil amendments tailored to local hydrogeochemical conditions.

Data availability

All data are underlying the result are available as part of the article and no additional source of data are required. On special cases, data will be made available on request.

Competing interest

The author declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.

Author contributions

Abhijeet Das: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, resources, software, validation, project administration, visualization, fund acquisition, writing—original draft, writing—review, and editing.

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges the editor’s and anonymous reviewers’ contributions to the improvement of this paper. The author would like to express his sincere gratitude to C. V. Raman Global University. The water-quality data utilized in this study was retrieved from the State Pollution Control Board, Odisha. Moreover, the author sincerely acknowledges the Research Group of Rani–Prativa Das for providing computational laboratory facilities to complete this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Song K, Yang G, Wang F, Liu J, Liu D. Application of geophysical and hydrogeochemical methods to the protection of drinking groundwater in karst regions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(10):3627. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103627.
  2. 2.
    Stanly R, Yasala S, Oliver DH, Nair NC, Emperumal K, Subash A. Hydrochemical appraisal of groundwater quality for drinking and irrigation: a case study in parts of southwest coast of Tamil Nadu India. Appl Water Sci. 2021;11(3):120. doi: 10.1007/s13201-021-01381-w.
  3. 3.
    Kumar D, Rajesh K, Mondal S, Warsi T, Rangarajan R. Ground- water exploration in limestone–shale–quartzite terrain through 2D electrical resistivity tomography in Tadipatri, Anantapur district, Andhra Pradesh. J Earth Syst Sci. 2020;129(1):116. doi: 10.1007/s12040-020-1341-0.
  4. 4.
    Basheer AA, Alezabawy AK. Geophysical and hydrogeochemical investigations of Nubian sandstone aquifer, South East Sinai, Egypt: Evaluation of groundwater distribution and quality in arid region. J Afr Earth Sci. 2020;169: 103862. doi: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2020.103862.
  5. 5.
    Verma P, Singh PK, Sinha RR, Tiwari AK. Assessment of groundwater quality status by using water quality index (WQI) and geographic information system (GIS) approaches: a case study of the Bokaro district India. Appl Water Sci. 2020;10(1):116. doi: 10.1007/s13201-019-1088-4.
  6. 6.
    Şener A, Pekşen E, Yolcubal İ. Application of square array configuration and electrical resistivity tomography for characterization of the recharge area of a karst aquifer: a case study from Menekşe karst plateau (Kocaeli, Turkey). J Appl Geophys. 2021;195: 104474. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104474.
  7. 7.
    Panneerselvam B, Paramasivam SK, Karuppannan S, Ravichandran N, Selvaraj P. A GIS-based evaluation of hydrochemical characterisation of groundwater in hard rock region, South Tamil Nadu India. Arabian J Geosci. 2020;13(17):122. doi: 10.1007/s12517-020-05813-w.
  8. 8.
    Das A. Anthropogenic effects on surface water quality assessment in Baitarani River Basin, Odisha using GIS and MCDM techniques. Eng Res Transcripts. 2023;5: 3764.
  9. 9.
    Das A. Assessment of potability of surface water and its health implication in Mahanadi Basin, Odisha. Mater Today: Proc. 2023; doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.367.
  10. 10.
    Das A. Identification of surface water contamination zones and its Sources on Mahanadi River, Odisha using entropy-based WQI and MCDM techniques. Eng Res Transcripts. 2023;4: 6792.
  11. 11.
    Das A. Water criteria evaluation for drinking purposes in Mahanadi River Basin, Odisha. In: Al Khaddar R, Singh SK, Kaushika ND, Tomar RK, Jain SK, editors. Recent developments in energy and environmental engineering. TRACE 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol. 333. Singapore: Springer; 2023. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-1388-6_20.
  12. 12.
    Chabuk A, Al-Madhlom Q, Al-Maliki A, Al-Ansari N, Hussain HM, Laue J. Water quality assessment along Tigris River (Iraq) using water quality index (WQI) and GIS software. Arab J Geosci. 2020;13(14):123. doi: 10.1007/s12517-020-05575-5.
  13. 13.
    Jesuraja K, Selvam S, Murugan R. GIS-based assessment of groundwater quality index (DWQI and AWQI) in Tiruchendur Coastal City, Southern Tamil Nadu India. Environ Earth Sci. 2021;80(7):117. doi: 10.1007/s12665-021-09542-5.
  14. 14.
    Selvam S, Manimaran G, Sivasubramanian P. Hydrochemical characteristics and GIS-based assessment of groundwater quality in the coastal aquifers of Tuticorin corporation, Tamilnadu, India. Appl Water Sci. 2013;3: 145159.
  15. 15.
    Das A. Multivariate statistical approach for the assessment of water quality of Mahanadi basin, Odisha. Mater Today: Proc. 2022;65: A1A11.
  16. 16.
    Baghel S, Tripathi MP, Khalkho D, Al-Ansari N, Kumar A, Elbeltagi A. Delineation of suitable sites for groundwater recharge based on groundwater potential with RS, GIS, and AHP approach for Mand catchment of Mahanadi Basin. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):9860.
  17. 17.
    Lee J, Kim S, Ikehara M, Horikawa K, Asahara Y, Yoo CM, Khim BK. Indian monsoon variability in the Mahanadi Basin over the last two glacial cycles and its implications on the Indonesian throughflow. Geosci Front. 2023;14(1):101483.
  18. 18.
    Jaiswal RK, Lohani AK, Galkate RV. Rainfall and agro related climate extremes for water requirement in paddy grown Mahanadi basin of India. Agric Res. 2023;12(1):2031.
  19. 19.
    Anjaneyulu R, Swain R, Behera MD. Future projections of worst floods and dam break analysis in Mahanadi River Basin under CMIP6 climate change scenarios. Environ Monit Assess. 2023;195(10):1173.
  20. 20.
    Das A. Surface water quality modelling using water quality index (WQI) and geographic information system (GIS) on the Mahanadi Basin, Odisha. In: Saxena S, Shukla S, Mural PKS, editors. Emerging materials and technologies in water remediation and sensing. ICWT 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol. 439. Singapore: Springer; 2024 doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-6762-9_2.
  21. 21.
    APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, Method 1020. Washington DC: American Public Health Association; 2005.
  22. 22.
    Li P-Y, Qian H, Wu J-H. Application of set pair analysis method based on entropy weight in groundwater quality assessment-A case study in Dongsheng City, Northwest China. E-J Chem. 2011;8: 879683. doi: 10.1155/2011/879683.
  23. 23.
    Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J. 1948;27(3):32703423. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x.
  24. 24.
    Li J, Shi Z, Wang G, Liu F. Evaluating spatiotemporal variations of groundwater quality in Northeast Beijing by self-organizing map. Water. 2020a;12(5):1382, doi: 10.3390/w12051382.
  25. 25.
    Kohonen T. In: Self-organizing maps. Series in Information Sciences, vol. 30. Heidelberg: Springer; 1995. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-97610-0.
  26. 26.
    Gharibi H, Mahvi AH, Nabizadeh R, Arabalibeik H, Yunesian M, Sowlat MH. A novel approach in water quality assessment based on fuzzy logic. J Environ Manage. 2012;112: 8795. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.007.
  27. 27.
    Jiang T, Qu C, Wang M, Hu B. Hydrochemical characteristics of shallow groundwater and the origin in the Pinggu plain, Beijing. J Arid Land Resour Environ. 2017;31(11):122127.
  28. 28.
    Nguyen TT, Kawamura A, Tong TN, Nakagawa N, Amaguchi H, Gilbuena R. Clustering spatio-seasonal hydrogeochemical data using self-organizing maps for groundwater quality assessment in the Red River Delta, Vietnam. J Hydrol. 2015;522: 661673. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.023.
  29. 29.
    Bodrud-Doza M, Islam ARMT, Ahmed F, Das S, Saha N, Rahman MS. Characterization of groundwater quality using water evaluation indices, multivariate statistics and geo-statistics in Central Bangladesh. Water Sci. 2016;30(1):1940. doi: 10.1016/j.wsj.2016.05.001.
  30. 30.
    Choi B-Y, Yun S-T, Kim K-H, Kim J-W, Kim HM, Koh Y-K. Hydrogeochemical interpretation of South Korean groundwater monitoring data using self-organizing maps. J Geochem Explor. 2014;137: 7384. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2013.12.001.
  31. 31.
    Jin Y-H, Kawamura A, Park S-C, Nakagawa N, Amaguchi H, Olsson J. Spatiotemporal classification of environmental monitoring data in the Yeongsan River Basin, Korea, using self-organizing maps. J Environ Monit. 2011;13(10):28862894. doi: 10.1039/c1em10132c.
  32. 32.
    Esquivel JM, Morales GP, Esteller MV. Groundwater monitoring network design using GIS and multicriteria analysis. Water Resour Manag. 2015;29(9):31753194. doi: 10.1007/s11269-015-0989-8.
  33. 33.
    WHO. Guidelines for drinking-water quality. World Health Organization; 2017.

Written by

Abhijeet Das

Article Type: Research Paper

Date of acceptance: July 2024

Date of publication: August 2024

DOI: 10.5772/geet.33

Copyright: The Author(s), Licensee IntechOpen, License: CC BY 4.0

Download for free

© The Author(s) 2024. Licensee IntechOpen. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Impact of this article

70

Downloads

124

Views


Share this article

Join us today!

Submit your Article