Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Perspective Chapter: Bioconversion of Agricultural and Food Wastes to Vinegar

Written By

Debajyoti Saha and Prabir Kumar Das

Submitted: 28 June 2022 Reviewed: 15 December 2022 Published: 06 January 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.109546

From the Edited Volume

Functional Food - Upgrading Natural and Synthetic Sources

Edited by Ana Novo Barros, Joana Campos and Alice Vilela

Chapter metrics overview

480 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Agricultural residues and fruit/food wastes are a curse to the environment but this can also play an important role in meeting the growing needs for energy, value-added chemicals, and food security problems. Vinegar is an acidic liquid whose major component is acetic acid and consists of different organic acids and bioactive compounds. Vinegar is a substance produced by the acetic acid bacteria Acetobacter and Gluconobacter that has a 4% acetic acid content. For the efficient biological production of acetic acid, a variety of renewable substrates are used, including agro and food, dairy, and kitchen wastes. This reduces waste and lowers environmental pollution. There are different types of traditional vinegar available all over the world and have many applications. Vinegar can be made either naturally, through alcoholic and then acetic fermentation, or artificially, in laboratories. This chapter emphasizes the production and biotransformation of agricultural and fruit wastes into vinegar and the genetic manipulations done on microorganisms to utilize a wide range of substrates and achieve maximum product titer.

Keywords

  • agri-food waste
  • biotransformation
  • acetobacter
  • anaerobic fermentation
  • acetic acid
  • vinegar

1. Introduction

Acetic acid and water combine to produce vinegar, a liquid consumable, mostly used as food ingredients, flavoring agents, or preservatives. It usually contains 4–8% (v/v) acetic acid, one of the most easily produced mild acids. Depending on the type of vinegar, additional substances may also be present, such as flavorings or synthetic coloring. There are numerous variations, qualities, and price ranges of vinegar available worldwide, starting from inexpensive distilled or synthetic vinegar and ordinary wine/cider vinegar to extremely expensive traditional balsamic goods [1]. Vinegar is one of the most valuable food products due to its adaptability and range of usages, and the global vinegar market has reached a value of US$ 2.27 Billion in 2021 and is expected to increase by 2.6% up to 2027 [2]. Cider vinegar and normal vinegar are the two main varieties of vinegar available. As compared to regular vinegar, which is manufactured from untreated plant materials like grains, apples, grapes, or sugarcane, cider vinegar is made from fruit juices. In addition to having anti-diabetic properties and decreasing blood cholesterol levels by reducing the oxidation of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs), cider vinegar is a highly advantageous beverage for consumers.

Vinegar is produced using two basic biotechnological processes: acetous fermentation in the presence of acetic acid bacteria and alcoholic fermentation, which takes place in the presence of yeast, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In contrast to acetous fermentation, which turns alcohol into acetic acid, alcoholic fermentation involves the conversion of sugar to alcohol. There are two different ways to make vinegar: the traditional way (Orleans method) and the rapid way (submerged and generator methods) [3]. A schematic diagram of three major different vinegar-making processes is shown in Figure 1. However, the method of making it has been seen long ago as a chemical process. The Dutchman Boerhaave noticed that the “mother of vinegar” was a live organism in 1732, as described in the overview of the history of vinegar, although he did not specify how this organism contributed to the acidification process. Due to its tight oxygen requirement, we will refer to this process as “acetification” rather than the more well-known “acetous fermentation.”

Figure 1.

A schematic representation of major three ways of vinegar production from various wastes.

There is a wide range of raw materials used in the production of vinegar, from agricultural surpluses and wastes to premium substrates for the most distinctive and valuable vinegars, such as Sherry vinegar (Spain) and Aceto Balsamico Tradizionalle (Italy). Up to ten different types of vinegar are listed in the quality standard, including wine vinegar, fruit vinegar, cider vinegar, alcoholic vinegar, cereal vinegar, malt vinegar, malt distillate vinegar, balsamic vinegar (with added grape must), and “other balsamic vinegars,” which include any other agriculturally derived substrate, such as honey or rice. However, worldwide most of the vinegar produced is “white” vinegar, that is, vinegar produced directly from diluted alcohol [4].

It is well known that producing macerated vinegars using various fruit components is one of the potential uses of waste from the fruit business. For the maceration with vinegar, the peels of citrus fruits like orange, lemon, lime, grapefruit, or the complete strawberry have been used numerous times. There are also several instances of vinegar maceration with other fruits like bananas, passion fruits, or apples in the literature [5]. Vinegar can frequently be produced from waste fruit, substandard honey, and other sugar-containing materials that are unsafe to drink or sell. This is how waste cores and peels from fruit dryers and canneries can be used to make money. As a form of agricultural waste, pineapple peels account for about 35% of the total mass of the fruit. These wastes could result in a significant issue if they are released into the environment untreated. Therefore, it is essential to recycle waste raw materials into useful products with higher value-added, or even as raw material for other industries, to use as food or feed after biological treatment, or all three [6].

Acetic acid bacteria (AAB), which are frequently present in the raw materials used in the production of vinegar, are capable of producing vinegar. The majority of the species identified in vinegar belong to Acetobacter and Gluconacetobacter, two of the officially recognized AAB taxa in the Acetobacteraceae family. At low acetic acid concentrations, Acetobacter spp. prevail. Species like Komagataeibacter europaeus or Gluconacetobacter intermedus predominate when acetic acid levels approach 5% (v/v). The optimum method for ensuring the success and evolution of the fermentation is typically thought to employ a mixed culture of a “fast starter” (such as Acetobacter pasteurianus or Acetobacter aceti) and one with high resistance to acetic acid (such as K. europaeus). So, this chapter emphasizes the bioconversion of various food or agro-industrial wastes into vinegar with the help of genetically modified microorganisms [7].

In this chapter, we have shown a wide range of waste resources can be converted into different types of vinegar which have numerous usages. The improved production of vinegar by developing the fermenting microorganism’s genome with the help of genetic and metabolic engineering is also shown in this chapter. So, this chapter will give a comprehensive idea about the bioconversion of various agro and food industry wastes into innumerable vinegar with diverse applications.

Advertisement

2. Feedstocks used for vinegar production

The food sector relies heavily on vinegar as a food preservative. Vinegar can be made from a variety of basic materials, including different fruits and fruit peels. Additionally, a variety of agricultural waste products can be employed as raw materials. Several studies revealed that the saccharification process was significantly impacted by the enzymatic treatment of pineapple wastes.

2.1 Agricultural wastes as feed

Every microorganism requires nutrient media as a source of energy and minerals for utilization in growth and multiplication. When media are fed to microorganisms inside a bioreactor is termed feed. These media mainly consist of one or two carbon sources, nitrogen, amino acid, and salts. The carbon source in the feed is mainly used for cell growth and product formation. C6 sugars (glucose & fructose), C5 sugars (xylose), and glycerol are the mainstream carbon sources that are used. Whereas, nitrogen is required for the synthesis of DNA, RNA, amino acids, ATP, and other molecules. These include yeast extract, beef extract, malt extract, ammonium chloride, ammonium sulfate, peptone, and tryptone. Microorganisms that cannot synthesize particular proteins on their own are fed amino acids in the media.

Due to overgrowing population, there is an increase in the demand for food, fuel, and biochemicals. Sugar is a major ingredient/precursor for the production of the above three and is mainly extracted from sugarcane, sugar beet, corn, and other sources, creating competition between food and chemicals. An alternative way to this precursor is the use of plant fiber waste from agricultural waste. Agricultural wastes include solid and liquid wastes discharged by farm products processing and agricultural production, livestock and poultry breeding, and rural residents [8]. Agricultural biomass wastes are mainly crop stalks, bagasse, leaves, roots, fruit peels, and seed/nutshells, which are mostly discarded, burnt, or leftover in fields, and are composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin [9].

Microorganisms used in the fermentation process, do not have access to direct consumption of glucose and xylose, mannose and arabinose present in cellulose and hemicellulose respectively due to the presence of a protective layer of lignin. So, the agricultural waste needs to be delignified to release C5 and C6 sugars. Delignification is done by pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Pretreatment can be broadly categorized into physio-chemical pretreatment and biological pretreatment.

Biological pretreatment is considered the most eco-friendly process that is carried out using enzymes [10, 11] and microbes [12]. In this treatment, neither addition of chemical supplementation is required nor toxic by-products are formed during the process. This treatment process is very slow and time-consuming compared to other processes. It requires several weeks for the sufficient delignification of lignocellulosic biomass. A newly developed fungal consortium was used to pretreat rice straw and willow, resulting in saccharification yields of up to 74.2% and 63.6% respectively [13]. After 12 weeks of pretreatment of bamboo culms with white-rot basidiomycete Punctularia sp. TUFC20056 showed high lignin degradation (>50%) and glucose and total sugar yields were increased to 42.9 ± 10.9% and 60.3 ± 16.1%, respectively [14]. Corn stalks pretreatment by white-rot fungus Irpex lacteus yielded a maximum reducing sugar of 313.5 mg/g (w/w) and overall glucose of 236.9 mg/g after 28 days of pretreatment [15]. Stereum hirsutum degraded the lignin of Japanese red pine Pinus densiflora by 14.52% after 8 weeks of pretreatment [16].

Physio-chemical pretreatments are conventional physical/mechanical, chemical, and combined pretreatment. Conventional physical/mechanical pretreatment includes steam explosion, milling, chipping, etc. Other than steam explosion all other physical pretreatment methods are solely used for size reduction of biomass, which alone is found to be ineffective for delignification, depolymerization, and crystallinity reduction. So, chemical pretreatment like acid treatment, ammonia-assisted treatment, organosolv pretreatment, alkaline, alkaline peroxide treatment, and liquid hot water treatment is used for further processing of biomass. When rice straw was pretreated with 12% w/v NaOH at 0°C for 3 h and concentrated H3PO4 at 50°C for 30 min, glucose yield was 163.5 and 192.3 g/Kg, respectively [17]. It was observed that 0.61 M H2SO4 catalyzed liquid hot water pretreatment (143.2°C, 38.4 min) of pineapple leaves resulted in 91% glucose yield [18]. After pretreatment of oil palm, empty fruit bunch in 1.5% maleic acid at 176.5°C for 70 min resulted in 45% cellulose and 20% hemicellulose yield [19]. Hydrolysis of barley straw was carried out with 2% H2SO4 at 180°C for 30 min resulting in a maximum glucose yield of 28.2 g/L [20].

2.2 Fruit and food waste as feed

Increased use of processed fruit products globally is increasing fruit processing waste (FPW) by up to 20 to 50% [21]. These wastes include rotten & discarded fruits, leaves, peels, pulps, and pomace, which are generated during harvesting, transporting, extracting/processing, and consuming. FPW is dumped in landfills or incinerated which causes various environmental problems like leaching and a bad odor due to its high moisture content, high organic matter content, and low pH [22]. But these are found to be a good source of bioactive compounds like anthocyanins, phenolics, alkaloids, glycosides, and volatile oils [23, 24]. These can be even used for the production of volatile fatty acids [25, 26], biogas [27, 28, 29], and bioenergy (bio-ethanol, butanol & electricity) [30, 31, 32, 33, 34].

Some FPW also needs to be pretreated to release reducing sugars, to be easily available to microbes. Mango and banana being the two most important food crops of India [35], generates a large amount of waste, which could be used to produce renewable fuels and fermentation products. To access their sugar contents the researchers treat banana peels, leaves, stems, pith, and mango peels in different acid/alkaline pretreatments [36, 37]. Microwave-assisted 1% NaOH pretreatment of mango peels for 2 min resulted in 0.704 g/g of reducing sugar yield where cellulose and hemicellulose were 44.2% and 26.2%, respectively [38]. Pretreatment of banana leaf in 0.1 N H2SO4 at 45°C resulted in 524.483 mg/g of reduced sugar yield [39], while microwave-assisted acid pretreatment in 5% H2SO4 at 180°C for 30 min resulted in the cellulose of ∼37% and hemicellulose of ∼48% from banana leaf and pith [37]. Nguyen et al. did subsequent hydrothermal pretreatment at 95°C for 30 min and enzymatic hydrolysis with 2% cellulase and 0.125% Tween-20 on low-grade longan fruits wastes which yielded 240.396 g/L of reducing sugar [40]. Date palm cellulosic wastes under 2 N NaOH treatment at 30°C yield 31.56 mg/mL of glucose [41]. Apple juice has become a part of the diet in most households, this high demand and production of apple juice create a large quantity of waste in the form of pomace which is high in sugars. Pretreatment of apple pomace with 0.5% CaO yielded high glucose and fructose of 40 g/l and 25.9 g/l respectively but the yield was lower when treated in dilute sulfuric acid [42], whereas when treated in 2% HNO3 at 120°C yields 53.1 g/l of total sugar [43].

2.3 Dairy waste as feed

A rise in the demand for milk and milk products has led to the huge growth of the dairy industry in the world [44]. The dairy industry produces a variety of products which includes- milk, milk powder, cream, butter, cheese, yogurt, fermented milk products, and many more, which generates a lot of solid and liquid wastes. These wastes are detrimental to water bodies and the environment because of their high organic content. Dairy wastewater contains suspended and dissolved solids, trace and soluble organic components, lactose, nutrients, fats, sulfates, chlorides, etc. and it is normally characterized by high biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) [45], which makes wastewater treatment challenging and expensive [46]. An alternative way to handle this waste is to use them as raw material for the production of other industrial products or energy generation. Whey, a liquid by-product from cheese and casein manufacturing is the most abundant pollutant in dairy wastewater. It is composed of lactose (45–50 g/L), soluble proteins (6–8 g/L), lipids (4–5 g/L), and mineral salts (8–10% of dried extract) like NaCl, KCl, calcium phosphates and lactic acid (0.5 g/L), citric acid and group B vitamins [47]. It also shows high chemical oxygen demand (COD; 50–70 g/L) and biological oxygen demand (BOD; 27–60 g/L) [48]. Other than using whey as feedstock for animal feeding, nowadays it is being fermented by different microbes for the production of value-added products ranging from whey drinks (from lactic and acetic fermentations), vinegar, and biopolymers like polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) and bacterial cellulose (Figure 2). Whey vinegar production includes sequential alcoholic and acetic fermentation by consuming lactose and producing ethanol which is further consumed to yield acetic acid. It has been reported that vinegar from whey fermentation contained acetic acid in the range of 4–5% and tasted mellow acidic. Table 1 enlists some of the whey vinegar production conditions, strains involved and acetic acid content.

Figure 2.

Whey to value-added products through microbial fermentation.

ProductSubstrate/pretreatmentStrainType of Bioreactor/mode of operationYield of acetic acidReferences
Traditional VinegarRice vinegarGlutinous rice (Kiaw Ngu).
Tanekoji preparation (starch hydrolysis) using spores of Aspergillus oryzae before fermentation.
Acetobacter pasteurianus TISTR 102Solid state fermentation6.68% (w/v)[49]
Rice wineAcetobacteraceti WK100-L internal Venturi
injector bioreactor. Semi-continuous
65 g/l[50]
Loofa sponge immobilization in 60 L reciprocating shaker56 g/l[51]
Rice wineAcetobacter sp.8 L Acetator.
Submerged fermentor
7.8% (w/v)[52]
Wine vinegarWhite table wineA. pasteurianus CECT 824Batch and semi-continuous60 g/l and 115 g/l[53]
Cashew wineA. aceti50 L reactor.
Batch
4% (w/v)[54]
Cider vinegarApple juiceAAB, LABWooden barrels5% (w/v)[55]
Black vinegarKurozu (unpolished rice).
Koji preparation (starch hydrolysis) using Aspergillus oryzae or A. luchuensis.
Not required54 L of ceramic pots.
Batch.
By The Japanese Agricultural Standard System is 1.5–8% (w/v)[56]
Cocoa vinegarCocoa pulp liquidA. acetiBatch1.64%[57]
Chinese vinegarCereals and their bransKoji: Aspergillus, Rhizopus Monascus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Hansenula anomala.
AAB
Solid state fermentation3.5–6%[58]
Fruit waste vinegarSubstandard apples & grapesJuice extracted from the fruits & treated with potassium metabisulfiteA. aceti NCIM 2094500 ml conical flask6.75% (apple) & 6.80% (grapes) (w/v)[59]
Strawberry vinegarSurpluses of strawberry5% (w/v) and vinegar yield of 66.2 ± 2.5%[60]
Marula vinegarMarula (Sclerocarya birrea) fruit processing wastes.A. aceti ATCC 1597350 ml falcon tubes.
Surface fermentation.
57 g/l[61]
Shea vinegarShea (Vitallera Paradoxa Gaernt) pulp from shea nut processing industry.Naturally inoculated by AAB23 L gallons.
Batch.
68.5 ± 0.3 g/l[62]
Onion vinegarDiscarded onionsAcetobacter orientalis MAK885 L glass fermenter.
Semi-continuous
4.35% (w/v) and productivity of 17.73 g/(l·d) was achieved[63]
A. pasteurianusCharcoal pellet bioreactor.37.9 g/l[64]
Acetobacter tropicalis KFCC 11476P120 L pilot scale fermenter.
Fed-batch.
0.67 g/g.l.h[65]
Pineapple vinegarPineapple (Ananas comosus)peels and core.
Enzymatic pretreatment
A. acetiBatch.5% (w/v)[66]
Pineapple (A. comosus)peelsA. pasteurianus FPB2–3Simultaneous alcoholic & acetic fermentation6.5% (w/v)[67]
Pineapple (Smooth Cayenne) peels.Propiniobacterium acicipropionici500 mL of Erlenmeyer flask.
Batch
4.81–6.15% (w/v)[68]
Amla vinegarAmla (Emblica officinalis Gaertn) fruit food processing waste.A. aceti NRRL 7465.7% (w/v)[69]
Apple vinegarApple pomace.
Enzymatic pretreatment.
A. acetiBatch61.4 g/100 g dry matter[70]
Olive oil vinegarOlive oil mil wastewaterAcetobacter sp.5.6% (w/v)[71]
Agricultural/Forestry waste vinegarFermented pepper leaf vinegarWongi-1 pepper (Capsiccum annuum L.) leaves.A. aceti KACC 11978Batch46.1 ± 2.22 g/l[72]
Corncob vinegarcorncobA. aceti NCIM 21163.91% (w/v)[73]
Wood vinegarPruned apple tree branches.
Pyrolysis at 500C for 30 min.
27 mg/ml[74, 75]
Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolate)
Pyrolysis at 350C.
34.09%[76]
Rubberwood logs.
Pyrolysis at 400 C
5.56% (w/v)[77]
Chinese fir wood sawdust
Pyrolysis at 260C
72.4% vinegar yield.[78]
Paper sludgeFermentation of paper sludge by co-culture of 3 bacteria.Clostridium thermocellum, Clostridium clariflavum and Moorella thermoacetica (1:1:1)3.7 g/l[79]
Dairy waste vinegarSweet cheese wheyKluyveromyces marxianus Y102 and Acetobacter aceti DSM-3508200 L fed-batch fermenter with biomass recycling.acetic acid: 11.55 g/L[80]
Sweet cheese whey and food-grade lactoseKluyveromyces fragilis CECT 1123 and A. pasteurianus250 ml flask.5%[81]
Whey solution was saccharified with Rapeseed meal-Koji/Wheat bran-KojiAspergillus oryzae, Zymomonas mobilis and A. pasteurianus4%[82]
WheyAcetobacter pomorum IWV-03250 ml flask5.6%[83]

Table 1.

Different types of vinegar produced from various waste resources.

‘-’ data not available.

Advertisement

3. Waste to vinegar production

According to Food and Agricultural Organization, the production of fruit and vegetables went up by 54% and 65% respectively between 2000 to 2019 [84], but one-third(∼1.3 billion) of the production is lost as waste [85] of which 14% is lost during harvest and retail [86].

Nowadays, vinegar is being produced from nonconventional substrates like onions, discarded fruits, peels, pulp, pomace & agricultural wastes. When substandard apples and grapes were fermented with S. cerevisiae and A. aceti NCIM 2094 at 30°C and pH 5.0 yielded maximum acetic acid of 6.75% (apple) and 6.80% (grape) after 13 days [59]. Vinegar gets its unique aroma and flavor from acetic acid and other fermentation products in vinegar like organic acids, esters, ketones, and aldehydes [87], which are produced during the fermentation and aging process, where acetic acid acts as the precursor for the formation of these products [88]. Vinegar produced from agricultural and fruit wastes is also found to be rich in those volatile compounds. Pineapple’s (Ananas comosus) peels and core is discarded as waste, which was pretreated and subjected to fermentation with S. cerevisiae for 7–10 days under aerobic conditions at 25°C and then with A. aceti for 30 days at 32°C and pH 3.0 to obtain 5% acetic acid and also contained higher alcohols, esters, several aldehydes and ketones (including acetoin, 2,3-butanediol, ethyl acetate, and 2-phenyl ethanol) as the major components, along with significantly low levels of off-flavors. L-lysine, mellein, and gallic acid [66]. A red-colored vinegar composed of a total of 37.9 g/l acetic acids, was fermented from discarded onion juice by aerobic oxidation of ethanol using A. pasteurianus within 20 h of fermentation [64]. Fed-batch fermentation of discarded onion juice using Acetobacter tropicalis KFCC 11476P showed specific acetic acid productivity of 0.67 g/g.l.h [65] after 2 days of fermentation while the specific acetic acid productivity was 20.5 l/h when fermented by A. pasteurianus CICC 20001 [89], with flavonoids and polyphenols contents of 3 mg/ml and 976 μg/mL, respectively. Pulse electric field and ultrasound pretreated date palm (Sukkari variety) when subjected to alcoholic and acetic acid fermentation by S. cerevisiae and A. aceti GDMCC 1.15, respectively, yielded 30.96 ± 13 mg/ml acetic acid and increased levels of phenolics, flavonoids, and free amino acids than untreated dates [90]. Low-quality Zahdi date palm was used to produce vinegar by 2 step fermentation process, which contained 6.62% (w/v) acetic acid [91]. Cordyceps militaris, a popular medicinal fungus is discarded after use, which contaminates the environment, so Liu et al. [74, 75] enzymatically hydrolyzed freshly harvested C. militaris obscure solid medium with 0.5% the cellulase, 0.2% α-amylase, and 0.5% glucoamylase at different temperatures. The hydrolysate was then fermented for vinegar production by A. pasteurianus for 8 days at 30°C which yielded 28.58 g/l acetic acid and the contents of flavonoids and phenolics were 2.08 times and 67.5 times higher than rice vinegar, respectively [92]. A list of various types of vinegar produced from different feedstocks is shown in Table 1.

Bio-oil produced from pyrolysis of agricultural, forestry, and urban pruning residues is composed mainly of water (80–90%) and about 200 organic compounds, among which acetic acid is the main component [93]. A higher percentage of acetic acid is derived from the pyrolysis of Pine, poplar, oak, bamboo, and rice husks. One of the popular vinegar, wood vinegar, is also produced from agricultural residues mainly wood. The most typical types of biomass employed are hardwood chips and sawdust, although a range of biomass types, including wood, crops, agricultural leftovers, or diverse materials of biological origin, can be used to make wood vinegar. A common name for wood vinegar is pyroligneous acid or wood acid. It is an alcoholic beverage made when biomass is pyrolyzed under strictly monitored conditions. Wood pyrolysis is a technique that thermally breaks down biomass at temperatures between 200 and 600°C in an inert environment without oxygen, producing a variety of products like solid char (biochar, charcoal), tar, non-condensable gases, and wood vinegar [74, 75]. Among the pyrolysis products, wood vinegar makes up more than 20% of the yield. This means that after treatment, 1000 kg of feedstock will yield over 200 kg of wood vinegar [94]. A schematic diagram of wood pyrolysis for vinegar production is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

A schematic diagram of wood pyrolysis for the production of wood vinegar.

Advertisement

4. Genetic engineering and metabolic engineering

Acetic acid bacteria and some other microorganisms can produce acetic acid, the main component of vinegar from different biological routes like oxidation of ethanol, oxidation of acetaldehyde (decarboxylation of pyruvate), and hydrolysis of acetyl-CoA (from the reduction of pyruvate). A schematic metabolic pathway for the production of acetate from different sugars has shown in Figure 4. Researchers focused on the engineering of these microbes and manipulating their metabolic pathways and enzymes to overcome the limitations of acid stress, flux distribution, use of a single carbon source, and lower production yield. Fermentative oxidation of ethanol to acetic acid is dependent on two sequential reactions of membrane-bound pyrroloquinoline quinone-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase (PQQ-ADH) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), both of which are localized on the periplasmic side of the inner membrane [95, 96]. Thus, an increased yield of acetic acid from 52.23 g/L to 61.42 g/L was observed when the A. pasteurianus strain was engineered to overexpress the endogenous pyrroloquinoline quinone-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase (PQQ-ADH) genes comprising adhAB [97]. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter systems found in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes are membrane proteins that harness the energy of ATP hydrolysis to import nutrients inside cells and export toxic compounds out of cells. Overexpression of aatA, an ABC transporter, in A. aceti not only lets it withstand higher acid concentrations (acetic acid, formic acid, and propionic acid) but also increased acetic acid yield up to 111.7 ± 3.3 g/l [98]. Microorganisms like S. cerevisiae, Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum were engineered to be acetic acid tolerant by overexpressing RCK1 [99] and downregulation of sigI [100] genes, respectively. There are reports of expressing molecular chaperons and nucleotide excision repair proteins to make AAB strains tolerant to acetic acid and high yielding. Genetically modified strains with improved acetic acid production and tolerance to various factors are listed in Table 2. Certain strains like Acetobacterium woodii and Clostridium aceticum can utilize one-carbon compounds, such as carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, in the presence of hydrogen to produce acetic acid [109, 110]. Researchers are highly interested in utilizing this capability to use waste gases as feedstock for environmental remediation, introduce/express those genes in other AABs and for sustainable production of acetic acid.

Figure 4.

Metabolic pathway of acetate production. First alcoholic fermentation by yeast under anaerobic conditions followed by aerobic oxidation of ethanol by acetic acid bacteria.

OrganismEngineering strategyEffect/Yield (acetic acid)References
Acetobacter aceti IFO3283Expression of groESL operon (GroES and GroEL molecular chaperones)Improved tolerance to heat, ethanol, and acetic acid[101]
Expression of dnaKJ operon (DnaK and DnaJ proteins)Improved tolerance to heat and ethanol.[102]
Acetobacter pasteurianus JST-SOverexpression of adhA and adhB of Pyrroquinoline quinone-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase (PQQ-ADH)61.42 g/l[97]
A. aceti 10-8S2Overexpression of aatA, an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter111.7 ± 3.3 g/l[98]
A. aceti 10-8S2Overexpression of Acn (aconitase)105 g/l[103]
A. pasteurianus AC2005Overexpression of Uvra (nucleotide excision repair protein)85 g/l[104]
Gluconacetobacter intermedius NCI1051Disruption of quorum sensing gene ginI1.24 fold increased yield than parental NCI1051[105]
A. pasteurianus NBRC3283Expression of GrpE with dnaKJ operonImproved tolerance to heat, ethanol, and acetic acid[106]
Expression of clpB molecular chaperon[107]
A. pasteurianus G-40Mutated fabG encoding oxidoreductase15.5% increased yield of acetic acid[108]

Table 2.

Genetic and metabolic engineering for improved stress tolerance and increased acetic acid yield.

Advertisement

5. Applications of vinegar

Vinegar contains different organic acids and bioactive compounds which makes it useful in diverse fields. It is used as a preservative and household cleaning reagent for medicine. A detailed and specific application of various types of vinegar is enlisted in Table 3.

Vinegar nameCompositionMajor applicationReference
Medicinal use
Anti-infective
Date vinegarShows in vitro antimicrobial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.[111]
OxymelClarified honey:4 parts & white wine vinegar: 1 part
  • popular gargle for sore throat.

  • used as a vehicle for expectorant preparations, such as ipecacuanha, squill, etc., and in fever drinks.

[112]
Fruit vinegarAcetic acid: 0.1%
NaCl: 5%
inhibits the growth of foodborne pathogens in vitro, including those of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella typhimurium, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Staphylococcus aureus, Aeromonas hydrophila and Bacillus cereus[113]
Eucommia ulmoides leaves vinegarAcetic acid: 45.5 mg/mlExerted antibacterial activity against Bacillus subtilis.[114]
Daphne genkwa processed vinegarAnti-herpes activity[115]
Wood vinegar (apricot & olive seeds)Shows anti-inflammatory, anti-bacterial (P. aeruginosa, E. coli, S. aureus and Enterococcus casseliflavus) and anti-fungal (A. niger, P. tracheiphilus, and C. parasitica)[116]
Antitumor effect
Kurosu or Japanese black vinegarAcidity: 4.2%Inhibited the proliferation of cancer cells[117]
Red grape vinegarreduction of dysplasia and carcinogenesis in hamsters[118]
Coconut water vinegarPossess anti-tumor effect on 4 T1 breast cancer cells.[119]
Soybean-boiled extracted vinegarShows tumor-suppressing effect in vivo (mice) and apoptosis-inducing activity in vitro (U937 cells) analysis.[120]
Pineapple vinegarAcetic acid: 6–8%Delays cancer progression[121]
Effect on cardiovascular system, blood glucose and obesity
Honey vinegar syrup20% vinegar in honey syrupincreased fasting insulin level and decreased total cholesterol level in the intervention group[122]
Tomato vinegarAcidity: 5.6%Decreased body and visceral fat weight and also reduced hepatic triglyceride and cholesterol levels.[123]
Persimmon vinegarAcidity: 5.2%Reduced hepatic triglycerides and total cholesterol[124]
Pineapple peel vinegar0.8 ml vinegarHigh potency in restoring the Gonadosomatic Index on diabetic rats[125]
Apple cider vinegarDifferent acidity and dilutionShows potential impact on glycemic control, hyperlipidemia and control on body weight in type 2 diabetes patients[126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132]
Vinegar mixApple cider vinegar, garlic, ginger, lemon and honey mixtureAnti-hyperglycemic effect on postprandial glycemia in non-diabetic females[133]
Rice vinegarAcetic acid content reduced blood pressure and renin activity in spontaneously hypersensitive rat[134]
Nypa palm vinegar
  • Enhanced anti-glycemic effect compared to metformin.

  • Enhanced insulin level up to 79.8%

  • Significant anti-glycemic effect.

On adult male sprague–dawley rats
[135]
Pomegranate vinegarVinegar: 5–13%Increased lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation.[136]
Date vinegarAcetic acid: 2.89 g/gimproved the concentration of lipid and inflammatory biomarkers[137]
Gastric effect
Natural vinegarAcetic acid: 5%Showed protective effect against stress-induced gastric ulceration in male albino rats[138]
Apple cider vinegar2 ml/Kg/daysuppresses the hepatotoxicity and mutagenic activity of nicotine[139]
Effect on Nervous System
Grain vinegar0.1 ml nasal injection of vinegar, acidity: 4.2%Effective treatment for persistent hiccups.[140, 141, 142]
Oak wood vinegarVinegar: 2%Showed excellent alcohol oxidation by lowering blood alcohol concentration and was also effective in hangover improvement.[143]
Onion vinegarVinegar: 8.8Improved recovery of focal ischemic brain injured rat, with increased regional cerebral blood flow[144, 145]
Apple cider vinegarVinegar: 0.7% along with Zn with high-fat diet
  • Higher antioxidant potential

  • provide a protective effect against Alzheimer’s disease like neurological diseases

[146, 147]
Highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) vinegarVinegar: 120 mg/Kg for 7 days
  • Facilitated cholinergic activity by inhibiting acetylcholinesterase activity.

  • Enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity.

on Scopolamine-Induced Amnesia Mice Model.
[148]
Vinegar-baked Bupleuri Radix
  • Better antidepressant effects.

  • Significantly regulated the levels of neurotransmitters in the hippocampus and frontal cortex on a rat model of chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced depression

[149]
Kurozu or Japanese rice vinegarVinegar: 0.25%Improved cognitive dysfunction in the senescence-accelerated P8 mouse.[150]
Mulberry vinegarprevents neuroinflammation by regulating the NF-κB signaling pathway and glial activation in C6 glial cells[151]
Herbicidal & Pesticidal use
Coconut shell wood vinegarVinegar: water- 1:1096% of striped mealy bugs Ferrisia virgate were killed.[152]
Vinegar: water- 1:5085% of termite workers, Odontotermes sp. were killed.
Wood vinegarVinegar: 2–5%A decline in omnivore nematode in a wheat field[153]
Vinegar: 1%Decline in weeds and increased grain yield index.[154]
Pyrolyzed apple tree branch wood vinegarBroadleaf weed was controlled[154]
Controlled annual bluegrass[74]
Wood vinegar Ulmus spp. tree pruning wasteBroadleaf weed was controlled[75]
Wood vinegar (pistachio, cypress, and almond)reduced the mycelial growth of the fungus-like organism Ovatisporangium sp[155]
Wood vinegar (Toona sinensis)Vinegar: 2–8%strong termiticidal activity against Coptotermes curvignathus.[156]
Extractant use
Wood vinegar3:1 (vinegar:water)used to extract chromium, copper, and arsenic from chromated copper arsenate-treated wood[144, 145]
sodium humate: wood vinegar liquid: biochar powder- 1:1:1.5Enhances the remediation of Pb (II) ions[157]

Table 3.

A list of different types of vinegar and their specific applications.

‘-’ data not available.

5.1 As preservatives

Vinegar is mostly used as a food preservative in many countries. It is used for the pickling of fruits and vegetables and in the preparation of salad dressings, mayonnaise, and other food condiments [158].

5.2 As herbicides and pesticides

To protect crops and plants from weeds and insects different eco-friendly approaches are being taken so that a better yield of crops is achievable and it will not cause damage to the environment. It has been experimentally observed that vinegar especially wood vinegar is a remarkable herbicide when used in a dilute concentration [74, 75, 159, 160]. Wood vinegar contains some benzene derivatives that act as good germicidal and antifungal agents [161, 162, 163].

5.3 As extractant

Vinegar is used as an extraction agent of chromium, copper, and arsenic from chromate copper arsenate-treated wood using wood vinegar [144, 145].

5.4 As medicinal

Vinegar finds its place as a good anti-microbial agent, anti-oxidant agent, and in the prevention of various diseases like diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity, cholesterol, and cancer. The use of vinegar as a medicine dates back to the time of Hippocrates [129]. It has been shown that fruit vinegar containing 0.1% acetic acid can inhibit the growth of food-borne pathogens invitro.

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

The increasing population has led to an increase in demand for food, which has ultimately resulted in the increased generation of agricultural waste, fruit waste, and food processing waste. These wastes are a burden to the environment and cause pollution. To mitigate these wastes, bioconversion of these C-rich wastes is done. They are fermented or pyrolyzed to produce valuable chemicals, bioactive compounds, and fuels. The main component of vinegar is acetic acid and researchers are targeting to increase its yield by using genetic engineering tools and engineering metabolic pathways of microorganisms that generate acetic acid. Exploring wastes as substrate not only reduces the environmental problem but also solves food security problems leading to a future bioeconomy.

References

  1. 1. Lim SJ, Ho CW, Lazim AM, Fazry S. History and current issues of vinegar. In: Advances in Vinegar Production. Florida, US: CRC Press; 2019. pp. 1-17
  2. 2. Imarcgroup.com. Global Vinegar Market to Reach US$ 2.62 Billion by 2027 [online]. 2021. Available from: https://www.imarcgroup.com/global-vinegar-market [Accessed: June 27, 2022].
  3. 3. Ho CW, Lazim AM, Fazry S, Zaki UKHH, Lim SJ. Varieties, production, composition and health benefits of vinegars: A review. Food Chemistry. 2017;221:1621-1630
  4. 4. Mas A, Torija MJ, García-Parrilla MDC, Troncoso AM. Acetic acid bacteria and the production and quality of wine vinegar. The Scientific World Journal. 2014;2014:394671
  5. 5. Luzón-Quintana LM, Castro R, Durán-Guerrero E. Biotechnological processes in fruit vinegar production. Food. 2021;10(5):945
  6. 6. Aye KH. Utilization of Fruit Waste (Pineapple Peel) for Vinegar Production (Doctoral dissertation, MERAL Portal). Vol.7. Myanmar: Yadanabon University Research Journal 2016
  7. 7. Plioni I, Bekatorou A, Terpou A, Mallouchos A, Plessas S, Koutinas AA, et al. Vinegar production from corinthian currants finishing side-stream: Development and comparison of methods based on immobilized acetic acid bacteria. Food. 2021;10(12):3133
  8. 8. Hu J. Comparisons of biohydrogen production technologies and processes. In: Waste to Renewable Biohydrogen. Massachusetts, US: Academic Press; 2021. pp. 71-107
  9. 9. Sorieul M, Dickson A, Hill SJ, Pearson H. Plant fibre: Molecular structure and biomechanical properties, of a complex living material, influencing its deconstruction towards a biobased composite. Materials. 2016;9(8):618
  10. 10. Koupaie EH, Dahadha S, Lakeh AB, Azizi A, Elbeshbishy E. Enzymatic pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biomethane production-a review. Journal of Environmental Management. 2019;233:774-784
  11. 11. Wagner AO, Schwarzenauer T, Illmer P. Improvement of methane generation capacity by aerobic pre-treatment of organic waste with a cellulolytic Trichoderma viride culture. Journal of Environmental Management. 2013;129:357-360
  12. 12. Sindhu R, Binod P, Pandey A. Biological pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass–an overview. Bioresource Technology. 2016;199:76-82
  13. 13. Dhiman SS, Haw JR, Kalyani D, Kalia VC, Kang YC, Lee JK. Simultaneous pretreatment and saccharification: Green technology for enhanced sugar yields from biomass using a fungal consortium. Bioresource Technology. 2015;179:50-57
  14. 14. Suhara H, Kodama S, Kamei I, Maekawa N, Meguro S. Screening of selective lignin-degrading basidiomycetes and biological pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of bamboo culms. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation. 2012;75:176-180
  15. 15. Du W, Yu H, Song L, Zhang J, Weng C, Ma F, et al. The promoting effect of byproducts from Irpex lacteus on subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis of bio-pretreated cornstalks. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2011;4(1):1-8
  16. 16. Lee JW, Gwak KS, Park JY, Park MJ, Choi DH, Kwon M, et al. Biological pretreatment of softwood Pinus densiflora by three white rot fungi. Journal of Microbiology. 2007;45(6):485-491
  17. 17. Moradi F, Amiri H, Soleimanian-Zad S, Ehsani MR, Karimi K. Improvement of acetone, butanol and ethanol production from rice straw by acid and alkaline pretreatments. Fuel. 2013;112:8-13
  18. 18. Imman S, Kreetachat T, Khongchamnan P, Laosiripojana N, Champreda V, Suwannahong K, et al. Optimization of sugar recovery from pineapple leaves by acid-catalyzed liquid hot water pretreatment for bioethanol production. Energy Reports. 2021;7:6945-6954
  19. 19. Fatriasari W, Ulwan W, Aminingsih T, Sari FP, Suryanegara L, Iswanto AH, et al. Optimization of maleic acid pretreatment of oil palm empty fruit bunches (OPEFB) using response surface methodology to produce reducing sugars. Industrial Crops and Products. 2021;171:113971
  20. 20. Panagiotopoulos IA, Bakker RR, De Vrije T, Koukios EG. Effect of pretreatment severity on the conversion of barley straw to fermentable substrates and the release of inhibitory compounds. Bioresource Technology. 2011;102(24):11204-11211
  21. 21. Banerjee J, Singh R, Vijayaraghavan R, MacFarlane D, Patti AF, Arora A. Bioactives from fruit processing wastes: Green approaches to valuable chemicals. Food chemistry. 2017;15(225):10-22
  22. 22. Shen F, Yuan H, Pang Y, Chen S, Zhu B, Zou D, et al. Performances of anaerobic co-digestion of fruit and vegetable waste (FVW) and food waste (FW): Single-phase vs. two-phase. Bioresource Technology. 2013;144:80-85
  23. 23. Ajila CM, Aalami M, Leelavathi K, Rao UP. Mango peel powder: A potential source of antioxidant and dietary fiber in macaroni preparations. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies. 2010;11(1):219-224
  24. 24. Biesalski HK, Dragsted LO, Elmadfa I, Grossklaus R, Müller M, Schrenk D, et al. Bioactive compounds: Definition and assessment of activity. Nutrition. 2009;25(11–12):1202-1205
  25. 25. Eryildiz B, Taherzadeh MJ. Effect of pH, substrate loading, oxygen, and methanogens inhibitors on volatile fatty acid (VFA) production from citrus waste by anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology. 2020;302:122800
  26. 26. Ubeda C, Callejón RM, Hidalgo C, Torija MJ, Troncoso AM, Morales ML. Employment of different processes for the production of strawberry vinegars: Effects on antioxidant activity, total phenols and monomeric anthocyanins. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2013;52(2):139-145
  27. 27. Deressa L, Libsu S, Chavan RB, Manaye D, Dabassa A. Production of biogas from fruit and vegetable wastes mixed with different wastes. Environment and Ecology Research. 2015;3(3):65-71
  28. 28. Scano EA, Asquer C, Pistis A, Ortu L, Demontis V, Cocco D. Biogas from anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes: Experimental results on pilot-scale and preliminary performance evaluation of a full-scale power plant. Energy Conversion and Management. 2014;77:22-30
  29. 29. Tulun Ş, Bilgin M. Ultrasonic and thermal pretreatment of apple pomace to improve biochemical methane potential. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy. 2018;37(5):1601-1605
  30. 30. Chitranshi R, Kapoor R. Utilization of over-ripened fruit (waste fruit) for the eco-friendly production of ethanol. Vegetos. 2021;34(1):270-276
  31. 31. Djaafri M, Kalloum S, Kaidi K, Salem F, Balla S, Meslem D, et al. Enhanced methane production from dry leaflets of Algerian date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) Hmira cultivar, by alkaline pretreatment. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2020;11(6):2661-2671
  32. 32. Durán D, Figueroa Á, Gualdrón MA, Sierra R. Potential of tropical fruit waste in bioenergy processes and bioproducts design. Copenhagen, Denmark: 26th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition. 2018. pp. 166-174
  33. 33. Khandaker MM, Qiamuddin K, Majrashi A, Dalorima T. Bio-ethanol production from fruit and vegetable waste by using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In: Bioethanol Technologies. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2018
  34. 34. Rojas-Flores S, Noriega MDLC, Benites SM, Gonzales GA, Salinas AS, Palacios FS. Generation of bioelectricity from fruit waste. Energy Reports. 2020;6:37-42
  35. 35. National Horticulture Board; 2002. Available from: http://nhb.gov.in/report_files/banana/BANANA.htm [Accessed: 26 May 2022]
  36. 36. Arumugam R, Manikandan M. Fermentation of pretreated hydrolyzates of banana and mango fruit wastes for ethanol production. Asian Journal of Experimental Biological Sciences. 2011;2(2):246-256
  37. 37. Gabhane J, William SP, Gadhe A, Rath R, Vaidya AN, Wate S. Pretreatment of banana agricultural waste for bio-ethanol production: Individual and interactive effects of acid and alkali pretreatments with autoclaving, microwave heating and ultrasonication. Waste Management. 2014;34(2):498-503
  38. 38. Tiwari G, Sharma A, Sharma S. Saccharification of Mango Peel Wastes by Using Microwave Assisted Alkali Pretreatment to Enhance its Potential for Bioethanol Production. New Delhi, India: World Renewable Energy Technology Congress; 2016
  39. 39. Suhag M, Kumar A, Singh J. Saccharification and fermentation of pretreated banana leaf waste for ethanol production. SN Applied Sciences. 2020;2(8):1-9
  40. 40. Nguyen TVT, Unpaprom Y, Manmai N, Whangchai K, Ramaraj R. Impact and significance of pretreatment on the fermentable sugar production from low-grade longan fruit wastes for bioethanol production. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 2020;12:1-13
  41. 41. Alrumman SA. Enzymatic saccharification and fermentation of cellulosic date palm wastes to glucose and lactic acid. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2016;47:110-119
  42. 42. Magyar M, da Costa Sousa L, Jin M, Sarks C, Balan V. Conversion of apple pomace waste to ethanol at industrial relevant conditions. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2016;100(16):7349-7358
  43. 43. Hijosa-Valsero M, Paniagua-García AI, Díez-Antolínez R. Biobutanol production from apple pomace: The importance of pretreatment methods on the fermentability of lignocellulosic agro-food wastes. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2017;101(21):8041-8052
  44. 44. Chokshi K, Pancha I, Ghosh A, Mishra S. Microalgal biomass generation by phycoremediation of dairy industry wastewater: An integrated approach towards sustainable biofuel production. Bioresource Technology. 2016;221:455-460
  45. 45. Yonar T, Sivrioğlu Ö, Özengin N. Physico-chemical treatment of dairy industry wastewaters: A review. In: Technological Approaches for Novel Applications in Dairy Processing. Vol. 179. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2018
  46. 46. Ahmad T, Aadil RM, Ahmed H, Rahman U, Soares BC, Souza SL, et al. Treatment and utilization of dairy industrial waste: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2019;88:361-372
  47. 47. Carvalho F, Prazeres AR, Rivas J. Cheese whey wastewater: Characterization and treatment. Science of the Total Environment. 2013;445:385-396
  48. 48. Zotta T, Solieri L, Iacumin L, Picozzi C, Gullo M. Valorization of cheese whey using microbial fermentations. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2020;104(7):2749-2764
  49. 49. Taweekasemsombut S, Tinoi J, Mungkornasawakul P, Chandet N. Thai Rice vinegars: Production and biological properties. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(13):5929
  50. 50. Krusong W, Yaiyen S, Pornpukdeewatana S. Impact of high initial concentrations of acetic acid and ethanol on acetification rate in an internal Venturi injector bioreactor. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2015;118(3):629-640
  51. 51. Krusong W, Tantratian S. Acetification of rice wine by Acetobacter aceti using loofa sponge in a low-cost reciprocating shaker. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2014;117(5):1348-1357
  52. 52. Spinosa WA, Santos Júnior VD, Galvan D, Fiorio JL, Gomez RJHC. Vinegar rice (Oryza sativa L.) produced by a submerged fermentation process from alcoholic fermented rice. Food Science and Technology. 2015;35:196-201
  53. 53. Fregapane G, Rubio-Fernández H, Nieto J, Salvador MD. Wine vinegar production using a noncommercial 100-litre bubble column reactor equipped with a novel type of dynamic sparger. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 1999;63(2):141-146
  54. 54. Silva ME, Torres Neto AB, Silva WB, Silva FLH, Swarnakar R. Cashew wine vinegar production: Alcoholic and acetic fermentation. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2007;24(2):163-169
  55. 55. Lea AGH. Cider vinegar. In: Downing DL, editor. Processed Apple Products. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1988. pp. 279-301
  56. 56. Shibayama Y, Kanouchi H, Fujii A, Nagano M. A review of Kurozu, amber rice vinegar made in pottery jars. Functional Foods in Health and Disease. 2020;10(6):254-264
  57. 57. Ganda-Putra GP, Wartini NM, Darmayanti LPT. Characteristics of cocoa vinegar from pulp liquids fermentation by various methods. In AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 2155, No.1. New York, US: AIP Publishing LLC; 2019. p. 020038
  58. 58. Liu D, Zhu Y, Beeftink R, Ooijkaas L, Rinzema A, Chen J, et al. Chinese vinegar and its solid-state fermentation process. Food Reviews International. 2004;20(4):407-424
  59. 59. Grewal HS, Tewari HK, Kalra KL. Vinegar production from substandard fruits. Biological Wastes. 1988;26(1):9-14
  60. 60. Cerezo López AB, Mas A, Torija Martínez MJ, Mateo E, Hidalgo C. Technological process for production of persimmon and strawberry vinegars. International Journal of Wine Research. 2010;2:55-61
  61. 61. Molelekoa TB, Regnier T, da Silva LS, Augustyn WA. Potential of Marula (Sclerocarya birrea subsp. caffra) waste for the production of vinegar through surface and submerged fermentation. South African Journal of Science. 2018;114(11–12):1-6
  62. 62. Lowor ST, Yabani DT. Elaboration of wine and vinegar from Shea (Vitallera Paradoxa Gaernt) fruit. Chemistry Research Journal, 2019. 2019;4(6):7-21
  63. 63. Lee S, Lee JA, Park GG, Jang JK, Park YS. Semi-continuous fermentation of onion vinegar and its functional properties. Molecules. 2017;22(8):1313
  64. 64. Horiuchi JI, Tada K, Kobayashi M, Kanno T, Ebie K. Biological approach for effective utilization of worthless onions—Vinegar production and composting. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2004;40(2):97-109
  65. 65. Lee S, Jang JK, Park YS. Fed–batch fermentation of onion vinegar using Acetobacter tropicalis. Food Science and Biotechnology. 2016;25(5):1407-1411
  66. 66. Roda A, Lucini L, Torchio F, Dordoni R, De Faveri DM, Lambri M. Metabolite profiling and volatiles of pineapple wine and vinegar obtained from pineapple waste. Food Chemistry. 2017;229:734-742
  67. 67. Tanamool V, Chantarangsee M, Soemphol W. Simultaneous vinegar fermentation from a pineapple by-product using the co-inoculation of yeast and thermotolerant acetic acid bacteria and their physiochemical properties. Biotech. 2020;10(3):1-11
  68. 68. Chalchisa T, Dereje B. From waste to food: Utilization of pineapple peels for vinegar production. MOJ Food Process Technol. 2021;9:1-5
  69. 69. Singh Kocher G, Kaur Dhillon H, Kaur Bakshi D, Kaur Arora J. Development of a fermentation process for utilization of Emblica Officinalis Gaertn (Amla) candy waste for production of natural vinegar. Current Nutrition and Food Science. 2013;9(4):310-314
  70. 70. Parmar I, Rupasinghe HV. Bio-conversion of apple pomace into ethanol and acetic acid: Enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation. Bioresource Technology. 2013;130:613-620
  71. 71. De Leonardis A, Macciola V, Iorizzo M, Lombardi SJ, Lopez F, Marconi E. Effective assay for olive vinegar production from olive oil mill wastewaters. Food Chemistry. 2018;240:437-440
  72. 72. Song YR, Shin NS, Baik SH. Physicochemical properties, antioxidant activity and inhibition of α-glucosidase of a novel fermented pepper (Capsiccum annuum L.) leaves-based vinegar. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2014;49(11):2491-2498
  73. 73. Chakraborty K, Saha J, Raychaudhuri U, Chakraborty R. Feasibility of using corncob as the substrate for natural vinegar fermentation with physicochemical changes during the Acetification process. Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2015;6(10):935
  74. 74. Liu X, Wang J, Feng X, Yu J. Wood vinegar resulting from the pyrolysis of apple tree branches for annual bluegrass control. Industrial Crops and Products. 2021;174:114193
  75. 75. Liu X, Zhan Y, Li X, Li Y, Feng X, Bagavathiannan M, et al. The use of wood vinegar as a non-synthetic herbicide for control of broadleaf weeds. Industrial Crops and Products. 2021;173:114105
  76. 76. Lu X, Jiang J, He J, Sun K, Sun Y. Effect of pyrolysis temperature on the characteristics of wood vinegar derived from Chinese fir waste: A comprehensive study on its growth regulation performance and mechanism. ACS Omega. 2019;4(21):19054-19062
  77. 77. Ratanapisit J, Apiraksakul S, Rerngnarong A, Chungsiriporn J, Bunyakarn C. Preliminary evaluation of production and characterization of wood vinegar from rubberwood. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology. 2009;31(3):2-4
  78. 78. Wang C, Zhang S, Wu S, Sun M, Lyu J. Multi-purpose production with valorization of wood vinegar and briquette fuels from wood sawdust by hydrothermal process. Fuel. 2020;282:118775
  79. 79. Rabemanolontsoa H, Triwahyuni E, Takada M. Consolidated bioprocessing of paper sludge to acetic acid by clostridial co-culture. Bioresource Technology Reports. 2021;16:100842
  80. 80. Lustrato G, Salimei E, Alfano G, Belli C, Fantuz F, Grazia L, et al. Cheese whey recycling in traditional dairy food chain: Effects of vinegar from whey in dairy cow nutrition. Acetic Acid Bacteria. 2013;2(1):e8
  81. 81. Parrondo J, Herrero M, García LA, Díaz M. A note—Production of vinegar from whey. Journal of the Institute of Brewing. 2003;109(4):356-358
  82. 82. Kawamata Y, Toyotake Y, Ogiyama D, Takeda Y, Wakayama M. Development of the original whey-based vinegar using rapeseed meal or wheat bran as a raw material for koji. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 2021;45(12):e16097
  83. 83. Park JK, Huh CK, Gim DW, Kim YJ, Kim SH, Kwon YK, et al. Quality characteristics of whey makgeolli vinegar produced using Acetobacter pomorum IWV-03. Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2018;50(1):61-68
  84. 84. FAO. World Food and Agriculture—Statistical Yearbook 2021. Rome, 2021. DOI: 10.4060/cb4477en
  85. 85. United Nation. Food Loss and Waste Reduction. United Nations. n.d. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/observances/end-food-waste-day [Accessed: May 27, 2022].
  86. 86. United Nation. n.d. Worldwide food waste. ThinkEatSave. Available from: https://www.unep.org/thinkeatsave/get-informed/worldwide-food-waste [Accessed: May 27, 2022].
  87. 87. Ozturk I, Caliskan OZNUR, Tornuk F, Ozcan N, Yalcin H, Baslar M, et al. Antioxidant, antimicrobial, mineral, volatile, physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of traditional home-made Turkish vinegars. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2015;63(1):144-151
  88. 88. Yu YJ, Lu ZM, Yu NH, Xu W, Li GQ, Shi JS, et al. HS-SPME/GC-MS and chemometrics for volatile composition of Chinese traditional aromatic vinegar in the Zhenjiang region. Journal of the Institute of Brewing. 2012;118(1):133-141
  89. 89. Wang J, Liu X, Hang S, Cao C, He Y, Sun X, et al. Onion vinegar quality evaluation and its alleviate oxidative stress mechanism in Caenorhabditis elegans via SKN-1. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 2022;77:1-6
  90. 90. Siddeeg A, Zeng XA, Rahaman A, Manzoor MF, Ahmed Z, Ammar AF. Quality characteristics of the processed dates vinegar under influence of ultrasound and pulsed electric field treatments. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2019;56(9):4380-4389
  91. 91. Matloob MH. Zahdi date vinegar: Production and characterization. American Journal of Food Technology. 2014;9(5):231-245
  92. 92. Liu L, Chen Y, Luo Q, Xu N, Zhou M, Gao B, et al. Fermenting liquid vinegar with higher taste, flavor and healthy value by using discarded Cordyceps militaris solid culture medium. LWT. 2018;98:654-660
  93. 93. Lyu G, Wu S, Zhang H. Estimation and comparison of bio-oil components from different pyrolysis conditions. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2015;3:28
  94. 94. Shen R, Zhao L, Yao Z, Feng J, Jing Y, Watson J. Efficient treatment of wood vinegar via microbial electrolysis cell with the anode of different pyrolysis biochars. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2020;8:216
  95. 95. Chinnawirotpisan P, Theeragool G, Limtong S, Toyama H, Adachi OO, Matsushita K. Quinoprotein alcohol dehydrogenase is involved in catabolic acetate production, while NAD-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase in ethanol assimilation in Acetobacter pasteurianus SKU1108. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2003;96(6):564-571
  96. 96. Gao L, Wu X, Zhu C, Jin Z, Wang W, Xia X. Metabolic engineering to improve the biomanufacturing efficiency of acetic acid bacteria: Advances and prospects. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 2020;40(4):522-538
  97. 97. Wu X, Yao H, Cao L, Zheng Z, Chen X, Zhang M, et al. Improving acetic acid production by over-expressing PQQ-ADH in Acetobacter pasteurianus. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:1713
  98. 98. Nakano S, Fukaya M, Horinouchi S. Putative ABC transporter responsible for acetic acid resistance in Acetobacter aceti. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2006;72(1):497-505
  99. 99. Oh EJ, Wei N, Kwak S, Kim H, Jin YS. Overexpression of RCK1 improves acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Biotechnology. 2019;292:1-4
  100. 100. Alves RF, Zetty-Arenas AM, Demirci H, Dias O, Rocha I, Basso TO, et al. Enhancing acetic acid and 5-hydroxymethyl furfural tolerance of C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum through adaptive laboratory evolution. Process Biochemistry. 2021;101:179-189
  101. 101. Akiko OK, Wang Y, Sachiko K, Kenji T, Yukimichi K, Fujiharu Y. Cloning and characterization of groESL operon in Acetobacter aceti. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2002;94(2):140-147
  102. 102. Okamoto-Kainuma A, Yan W, Fukaya M, Tukamoto Y, Ishikawa M, Koizumi Y. Cloning and characterization of the dnaKJ operon in Acetobacter aceti. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2004;97(5):339-342
  103. 103. Nakano S, Fukaya M, Horinouchi S. Enhanced expression of aconitase raises acetic acid resistance in Acetobacter aceti. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2004;235(2):315-322
  104. 104. Zheng Y, Wang J, Bai X, Chang Y, Mou J, Song J, et al. Improving the acetic acid tolerance and fermentation of Acetobacter pasteurianus by nucleotide excision repair protein UvrA. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2018;102(15):6493-6502
  105. 105. Iida A, Ohnishi Y, Horinouchi S. Control of acetic acid fermentation by quorum sensing via N-acylhomoserine lactones in Gluconacetobacter intermedius. Journal of Bacteriology. 2008;190(7):2546-2555
  106. 106. Ishikawa M, Okamoto-Kainuma A, Jochi T, Suzuki I, Matsui K, Kaga T, et al. Cloning and characterization of grpE in Acetobacter pasteurianus NBRC 3283. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2010;109(1):25-31
  107. 107. Ishikawa M, Okamoto-Kainuma A, Matsui K, Takigishi A, Kaga T, Koizumi Y. Cloning and characterization of clpB in Acetobacter pasteurianus NBRC 3283. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2010;110(1):69-71
  108. 108. Phathanathavorn T, Naloka K, Matsutani M, Yakushi T, Matsushita K, Theeragool G. Mutated fabG gene encoding oxidoreductase enhances the cost-effective fermentation of jasmine rice vinegar in the adapted strain of Acetobacter pasteurianus SKU1108. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2019;127(6):690-697
  109. 109. Demler M, Weuster-Botz D. Reaction engineering analysis of hydrogenotrophic production of acetic acid by Acetobacterium woodii. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2011;108(2):470-474
  110. 110. Sim JH, Kamaruddin AH, Long WS, Najafpour G. Clostridium aceticum—A potential organism in catalyzing carbon monoxide to acetic acid: Application of response surface methodology. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2007;40(5):1234-1243
  111. 111. Rabeea IS, Janabi AM. Antibacterial activity of different concentrations of date vinegar in comparison to ciprofloxacin against multidrug-resistance Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from infected burn. Anti-Infective Agents. 2018;16(2):96-99
  112. 112. Felter HW, Lloyd JU. King’s American Dispensatory. America. 1898. Available from: http://www.henriettesherbal.com/eclectic/kings/oxymel.html. [Accessed: 11 November 2006]
  113. 113. Entani E, Asai M, Tsujihata S, Tsukamoto Y, Ohta M. Antibacterial action of vinegar against food-borne pathogenic bacteria including Escherichia coli O157: H7. Journal of Food Protection. 1998;61(8):953-959
  114. 114. Jia CF, Yu WN, Zhang BL. Manufacture and antibacterial characteristics of Eucommia ulmoides leaves vinegar. Food Science and Biotechnology. 2020;29(5):657-665
  115. 115. Uyangaa E, Choi JY, Ryu HW, Oh SR, Eo SK. Anti-herpes activity of vinegar-processed Daphne genkwa flos via enhancement of natural killer cell activity. Immune Network. 2015;15(2):91-99
  116. 116. Yıldızlı G, Coral G, Ayaz F. Anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, and anti-inflammatory activities of wood vinegar: A potential remedy for major plant diseases and inflammatory reactions. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 2022;12:1-10
  117. 117. Baba N, Higashi Y, Kanekura T. Japanese black vinegar “Izumi” inhibits the proliferation of human squamous cell carcinoma cells via necroptosis. Nutrition and Cancer. 2013;65(7):1093-1097
  118. 118. Ezzat S, Elsherbini A, Esmaeil D, Abdulrahman M. Pomegranate molasses and red grape vinegar: Can they alleviate dysplastic changes in chemically induced oral squamous cell carcinoma in hamsters? Egyptian Dental Journal. 2021;67(4):3137-3146
  119. 119. Mohamad NE, Yeap SK, Abu N, Lim KL, Zamberi NR, Nordin N, et al. In vitro and in vivo antitumour effects of coconut water vinegar on 4T1 breast cancer cells. Food & Nutrition Research. 2019. pp. 5-12
  120. 120. Inagaki S, Morimura S. Production of vinegar from soybean-boiled extract and research for its antitumor activity. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Shinshu University. 2011;47(1/2):17-23
  121. 121. Mohamad NE, Abu N, Yeap SK, Lim KL, Romli MF, Sharifuddin SA, et al. Apoptosis and metastasis inhibitory potential of pineapple vinegar against mouse mammary gland cells in vitro and in vivo. Nutrition & Metabolism. 2019;16(1):1-13
  122. 122. Derakhshandeh-Rishehri SM, Heidari-Beni M, Feizi A, Askari GR, Entezari MH. Effect of honey vinegar syrup on blood sugar and lipid profile in healthy subjects. International Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2014;5(12):1608
  123. 123. Lee JH, Cho HD, Jeong JH, Lee MK, Jeong YK, Shim KH, et al. New vinegar produced by tomato suppresses adipocyte differentiation and fat accumulation in 3T3-L1 cells and obese rat model. Food Chemistry. 2013;141(3):3241-3249
  124. 124. Moon YJ, Choi DS, Oh SH, Song YS, Cha YS. Effects of persimmon-vinegar on lipid and carnitine profiles in mice. Food Science and Biotechnology. 2010;19(2):343-348
  125. 125. Sitasiwi AJ, Jannah SN, Isdadiyanto S, Annisa T, Hermawati CM, Sari AM, et al. Study of the pineapple peel vinegar potency in restoring the gonadosomatic index of the diabetic rats. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021;1943(1):012067
  126. 126. Abu-Zaiton AS. Effect of apple vinegar on physiological state of pancreas in normal and alloxan induced diabetic rats. World Journal of Zoology. 2011;6(1):07-11
  127. 127. Bender B, Bárdos L. Effect of apple cider vinegar on plasma lipids (model experiment in mice). Potravinarstvo. 2012;6:1-4
  128. 128. Iman M, Moallem SA, Barahoyee A. Effect of apple cider vinegar on blood glucose level in diabetic mice. Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2014;20(4):163-168
  129. 129. Johnston CS, Steplewska I, Long CA, Harris LN, Ryals RH. Examination of the antiglycemic properties of vinegar in healthy adults. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2010;56(1):74-79
  130. 130. Kausar S, Abbas MA, Ahmad H, Yousef N, Ahmed Z, Humayun N, et al. Effect of apple cider vinegar in type 2 diabetic patients with poor glycemic control: A randomized placebo controlled design®. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences. 2019;8(2):149-159
  131. 131. Mitrou P, Petsiou E, Papakonstantinou E, Maratou E, Lambadiari V, Dimitriadis P, et al. The role of acetic acid on glucose uptake and blood flow rates in the skeletal muscle in humans with impaired glucose tolerance. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2015;69(6):734-739
  132. 132. Nazıroğlu M, Güler M, Özgül C, Saydam G, Küçükayaz M, Sözbir E. Apple cider vinegar modulates serum lipid profile, erythrocyte, kidney, and liver membrane oxidative stress in ovariectomized mice fed high cholesterol. The Journal of Membrane Biology. 2014;247(8):667-673
  133. 133. Ishak I, George P, Ibrahim FW, Yahya HM, Fara N. Acute modulatory effects of apple cider vinegar, garlic, ginger, lemon and honey mixture, with and without exercise on postprandial glycemia in non-diabetic females. Journal of Health Sciences. 2018;16:105-111
  134. 134. Kondo S, Tayama K, Tsukamoto Y, Ikeda K, Yamori Y. Antihypertensive effects of acetic acid and vinegar on spontaneously hypertensive rats. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry. 2001;65(12):2690-2694
  135. 135. Yusoff NA, Yam MF, Beh HK, Razak KNA, Widyawati T, Mahmud R, et al. Antidiabetic and antioxidant activities of Nypa fruticans Wurmb. Vinegar sample from Malaysia. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2015;8(8):595-605
  136. 136. Ok E, Do GM, Lim Y, Park JE, Park YJ, Kwon O. Pomegranate vinegar attenuates adiposity in obese rats through coordinated control of AMPK signaling in the liver and adipose tissue. Lipids in Health and Disease. 2013;12(1):1-8
  137. 137. Ali Z, Ma H, Wali A, Ayim I, Sharif MN. Daily date vinegar consumption improves hyperlipidemia, β-carotenoid and inflammatory biomarkers in mildly hypercholesterolemic adults. Journal of Herbal Medicine. 2019;17:100265
  138. 138. Sakr HI, Khalifa MM, Saleh MA, Rashed LA, Khowiled AAH. Protective effect of apple cider vinegar on stress induced gastric ulcer. JMSCR. 2016;4(1):8951-8963
  139. 139. Omar NAA, Allithy ANEA, Faleh FM, Mariah RA, Ayat MMA, Shafik SR, et al. Apple cider vinegar (a prophetic medicine remedy) protects against nicotine hepatotoxicity: A histopathological and biochemical report. American Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2015;3:122-127
  140. 140. Gonella S, Gonella F. Use of vinegar to relieve persistent hiccups in an advanced cancer patient. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 2015;18(5):467-470
  141. 141. Iwasaki N, Kinugasa H, Watanabe A, Katagiri T, Tanaka R, Shin K, et al. Hiccup treated by administration of intranasal vinegar. No to Hattatsu = Brain and Development. 2007;39(3):202-205
  142. 142. Kako J, Kobayashi M, Kanno Y, Tagami K. Intranasal vinegar as an effective treatment for persistent hiccups in a patient with advanced cancer undergoing palliative care. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2017;54(2):e2-e4
  143. 143. Choi YI, Kwon JS, Song YS, Wang SH. The effect of oak wood vinegar extract on blood alcohol concentration and hangover syndrome. Biomolecules & Therapeutics. 2005;13(1):41-47
  144. 144. Choi CH, Kim KY, Jeong WS, Jeon BG, Jung JG, Jung JG, et al. Effects of onion vinegar on the cerebral blood flow and the safety examination. Journal of Physiology and Pathology in Korean Medicine. 2012;26(5):657-664
  145. 145. Choi YS, Ahn BJ, Kim GH. Extraction of chromium, copper, and arsenic from CCA-treated wood by using wood vinegar. Bioresource Technology. 2012;120:328-331
  146. 146. Tripathi S, Mazumder PM. Neuroprotective efficacy of apple cider vinegar on zinc-high fat diet-induced mono amine oxidase alteration in murine model of AD. Journal of the American Nutrition Association. 2022;41(7):658-667
  147. 147. Tripathi S, Kumari U, Mitra Mazumder P. Ameliorative effects of apple cider vinegar on neurological complications via regulation of oxidative stress markers. Journal of Food Biochemistry. 2020;44(12):e13504
  148. 148. Hong SM, Soe KH, Lee TH, Kim IS, Lee YM, Lim BO. Cognitive improving effects by highbush blueberry (Vaccinium crymbosum L.) vinegar on scopolamine-induced amnesia mice model. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2018;66(1):99-107
  149. 149. Lei T, Wang Y, Li M, Zhang X, Lv C, Jia L, et al. A comparative study of the main constituents and antidepressant effects of raw and vinegar-baked Bupleuri radix in rats subjected to chronic unpredictable mild stress. RSC Advances. 2017;7(52):32652-32663
  150. 150. Kanouchi H, Kakimoto T, Nakano H, Suzuki M, Nakai Y, Shiozaki K, et al. The brewed rice vinegar Kurozu increases HSPA1A expression and ameliorates cognitive dysfunction in aged P8 mice. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0150796
  151. 151. Bang SI, Kim HY, Seo WT, Lee AY, Cho EJ. Mulberry vinegar attenuates lipopolysaccharide and interferon gamma-induced inflammatory responses in C6 glial cells. Journal of Food Biochemistry. 2022;46:e14197
  152. 152. Wititsiri S. Production of wood vinegars from coconut shells and additional materials for control of termite workers, Odontotermes sp. and striped mealy bugs, Ferrisia virgata. Songklanakarin Journal of Science & Technology. 2011;33(3):349-354
  153. 153. İbrahim KOÇ, Yildiz Ş, Yardim EN. Effect of some pesticides and wood vinegar on soil nematodes in a wheat agro-ecosystem. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi. 2020;23(3):621-633
  154. 154. İbrahim KOÇ, Yildiz Ş, Yardim EN. A research on the effects of pesticides and wood vinegar on weeds and cultivated plants in wheat agro-ecosystem. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020;23(2):94-106
  155. 155. Bouket AC, Narmani A, Tavasolee A, Elyasi G, Abdi A, Naeimi S, et al. In vitro evaluation of wood vinegar (Pyroligneous acid) VOCs inhibitory effect against a fungus-like microorganism Ovatisporangium (Phytopythium) isolate recovered from tomato fields in Iran. Agronomy. 2022;12(7):1609
  156. 156. Adfa M, Kusnanda AJ, Saputra WD, Banon C, Efdi M, Koketsu M. Termiticidal activity of Toona sinensis wood vinegar against Coptotermes curvignathus Holmgren. Rasayan Journal of Chemistry. 2017;10(4):1088-1093
  157. 157. Zhu J, Gao W, Zhao W, Ge L, Zhu T, Zhang G, et al. Wood vinegar enhances humic acid-based remediation material to solidify Pb (II) for metal-contaminated soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021;28(10):12648-12658
  158. 158. Saha P, Banerjee S. Optimization of process parameters for vinegar production using banana fermentation. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology. 2013;2(9):501-514
  159. 159. Aguirre JL, Baena J, Martín MT, González S, Manjón JL, Peinado M. Herbicidal effects of wood vinegar on nitrophilous plant communities. Food and Energy Security. 2020;9(4):e253
  160. 160. Ward JS, Mervosh TL. Nonchemical and herbicide treatments for management of Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum). Invasive Plant Science and Management. 2012;5(1):9-19
  161. 161. Adfa M, Romayasa A, Kusnanda AJ, Avidlyandi A, Yudha SS, Anon BC, et al. Chemical components, antitermite and antifungal activities of Cinnamomum parthenoxylon wood vinegar. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology. 2020;48(1):107-116
  162. 162. Oramahi HA, Yoshimura T. Antifungal and antitermitic activities of wood vinegar from Vitex pubescens Vahl. Journal of Wood Science. 2013;59(4):344-350
  163. 163. Yatagai M, Nishimoto M, Hori K, Ohira T, Shibata A. Termiticidal activity of wood vinegar, its components and their homologues. Journal of Wood Science. 2002;48(4):338-342

Written By

Debajyoti Saha and Prabir Kumar Das

Submitted: 28 June 2022 Reviewed: 15 December 2022 Published: 06 January 2023