Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Herbaceous Edible Oilseed-Bearing Plants: Origin, Botanical Insights, Constraints, and Recent Progress

Written By

Naser A. Anjum, Asim Masood, Faisal Rasheed, Palaniswamy Thangavel, Shahid Umar and Nafees A. Khan

Submitted: 02 August 2024 Reviewed: 06 September 2024 Published: 03 October 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.115469

Edible Oilseeds Research - Updates and Prospects IntechOpen
Edible Oilseeds Research - Updates and Prospects Edited by Naser A. Anjum

From the Edited Volume

Edible Oilseeds Research - Updates and Prospects [Working Title]

Dr. Naser A. Anjum, Dr. Asim Masood, Dr. Shahid Umar and Dr. Nafees A. Khan

Chapter metrics overview

5 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Carbohydrates, lipids (mostly fats and oils), proteins, vitamins, minerals, and water are the six main classes of nutrients found in foods. After carbohydrates, oils are important source of major calories required in the human diet. Oils act as a vehicle for some of the important vitamins and possess a range of nutrients and bio-active compounds. These edible oil-yielding plants can be categorized into non-woody (herbaceous) and woody (non-herbaceous) oil-bearing plants. This chapter mainly focuses on important herbaceous edible oilseed (crop)plants such as pea(ground)nut (Arachis hypogaea L.), Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern. and Coss.), rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.) (syn. B. rapa), soybean (Glycine max L.), flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.), sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), sesame (Sesamum indicum L.), safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), and niger (Guizotia abyssinica L.). It aims to (a) overview the key insights into the origin, botany and benefits of the mentioned herbaceous edible oilseed (crop)plants; (b) highlight the major constraints for their growth and productivity (quantitative-qualitative); (c) enlighten important mitigation-approaches for minimizing the constraints-accrued impacts; (d) briefly overview the major aims and achievements of important breeding programmes focused on these oilseed-bearing (crops)plants; and also to (e) briefly present important aspects least explored on the subject.

Keywords

  • edible oilseeds
  • edible oils
  • herbaceous edible oilseed-bearing plants
  • breeding oilseed crops
  • botanical insights
  • recent Progress

1. Introduction

1.1 Human, balanced diet, and plants

Plants and/or plant-based (food and non-food) resources fundamentally sustain and nourish almost all life-forms on the Earth. In particular context of human nutrition (and diet), carbohydrates, lipids (mostly fats and oils), proteins, vitamins, minerals, and water are the six classes of nutrients found in foods. The first three components together constitute the bulk of the human diet. Notably, falling in the category of lipids, oils stand second to carbohydrates as an important source of major calories required in the human diet. Oils act as a vehicle for some of the important vitamins and also provide a range of nutrients and bio-active compounds with numerous metabolic functions and health benefits (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of the major nutrients and bio-active compounds available in typical edible oilseeds and their connection with human health.

Interestingly, edible oils are obtained to varying extents from the seeds, pulps, fruits, and plumules of certain plants, which can be categorized into non-woody (herbaceous) and woody (non-herbaceous) oil-bearing plants. In particular, edible oils are extracted from oil-yielding edible seeds (edible oilseeds). The list of major non-woody edible oilseed-bearing herbaceous (crop)plants includes pea(ground)nut (Arachis hypogaea L.), Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss.), rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.) (syn. B. rapa) (toria, sarson, summer turnip rape or Polish rape), soybean (Glycine max L.), flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.), sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), sesame (Sesamum indicum L.), safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), and niger (Guizotia abyssinica L.). The oils obtained from the mentioned oil-yielding edible oilseeds significantly vary in their fatty acid compositions (Figure 2A) [1]. In particular, edible oils obtained from A. hypogaea and B. campestris (syn. B. rapa), possess the highest (about 80%) unsaturated fatty acids. On the other hand, oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.), tea-oil tree (Camellia oleifera Abel.), olive (Olea europaea L.), and coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) are four well-known woody edible oil-bearing plants (trees) with high oil content. Other important woody edible oil-bearing plants are walnut (Juglans regia L.), pecan (Carya cathayensis Sarg.), shiny-leaved yellow-horn (Xanthoceras sorbifolium Bunge.), and hazelnut (Corylus heterophylla Fisch. ex Trautv.) (Figure 2B) [1]. Interestingly, human diet involving non-animal products (such as vegetable/rice, sugar, and nuts oils) minimizes the emission/relative footprints of greenhouse gases (heat-trapping gases in the Earth’s atmosphere) [2]. There has been an increasing trend in the cultivation of oil-bearing (crop)plants on the globe. Unfortunately, edible oil-bearing (crop)plants are sensitive to most stress and extreme climatic factors. Most of these stresses or factors, in isolation or combination, varyingly impact the health of edible oil-bearing (crop)plants and thereby also limit their quantitative and qualitative productivity.

Figure 2.

Schematic representation of the major non-woody (herbaceous) (A) and woody oil-bearing (B) plants [1].

Taking into account major herbaceous edible oilseed (crop)plants (A. hypogaea, B. juncea, B. campestris (syn. B. rapa), G. max, L. usitatissimum, H. annuus, S. indicum, C. tinctorius, and Guizotia abyssinica), (i) their origin, key botanical insights, and the major health benefits are introduced; (ii) the major constraints and their impacts are provided and enlightens important mitigation strategies are overviewed; (iii) the major progress made in important breeding programmes for edible oilseed (crop)plants are highlighted; and also (iv) important aspects so far least or unexplored in the present context are mentioned as follows.

Advertisement

2. Origin, key botanical insights and benefits

2.1 Pea(ground)nut

Believed to have originated in the Southern Bolivia and Brazil to the northern Argentina region of South America, pea(ground)nut (Arachis hypogaea L.) (hypogaea = under the Earth) is a perennial, herbaceous, self-pollinated, monoecious (having both the male and female reproductive organs in the same plant), and a leguminous edible allotetraploid (AABB-type genome; 2n = 4x = 40) oilseed crop and belongs to family Leguminosae (sub-family: Fabaceae). A. hypogaea usually attains 15-70 cm height, and its root system consists of a well-developed taproot with many lateral roots. Interestingly, A. hypogaea is a unique edible oilseed crop, which produces flowers above ground, and exhibits geocarpy, as it develops the fruits (pods containing edible oilseeds) below ground (earth). It is worldwide grown (as an annual crop) in the tropics and subtropics under rainfed conditions [3]. Moreover, A. hypogaea is grown mainly for the production of oil (seed-oil 43-55%), which is full of biologically active compounds with widely reported human health benefits (Figure 3). Given this, the consumption of A. hypogaea-based ‘ready-to-use therapeutic foods’ for community-based treatment of severe malnutrition has been encouraged by the World Health Organization of the United Nations [7].

Figure 3.

Schematic representation of a typical composition of fatty acids in major edible oilseed (crop)plants [4, 5, 6].

2.2 Cruciferous oilseeds

The cruciferous oilseeds (oilseed Brassicas) are herbaceous, self-pollinated, monoecious and annual economically important edible oilseed crops. Moreover, cruciferous oilseeds stand as the second largest oilseed crops after Glycine max in the world oilseed production [8]. The cruciferous oilseeds belong to a plant family Brassicaceae (Cruciferae), and are represented by a very complex genus Brassica. The genus Brassica possesses several taxonomic and classification problems because it has been entirely modified during its domestication by humans and contains many cultivated plants and wild species, entirely different from their ancestor(s). To his end, based mainly on the cytogenetic relationships, Nagaharu [9] attempted to systematically explain the major cultivated interrelated species of genus Brassica. Brassica species contain one or two of the three genome types A, B, and C. As per the relationships explained: Brassica campestris (syn. B. rapa) (2n = 20, with genome formula AA) of rapeseed and B. nigra (2n = 16, BB) and B. oleracea (2n = 18, CC) are the primary species. However, B. napus (2n = 28, AACC) and B. carinata (2n = 34, BBCC) of rapeseed and B. juncea (2n = 36, AABB) are the amphidiploids resulting from paired crossings between the primary species. A triangle of U [9] represents the botanical and genomic relationships between these six species.

The most widely distributed oilseed crop among the oilseed Brassicas, B. campestris (syn. B. rapa) is presently native to throughout Europe, Russia, Central Asia, and Near East; and has northern India (Himalayan region) as its primary centre of origin, and the European-Mediterranean area and Asia as its secondary centre of origin. Spring types of B. campestris are usually preferred and are largely grown in Sweden, Finland, some parts of Canada, and northwest China [10, 11]. Generally thought to have originated in the Middle East, B. juncea may also have arisen by independent hybridization at secondary centres in India, China, and Caucasus [12, 13]. B. juncea is the predominant Brassica in Asia and the Indian sub-continent. However, Canadian-grown Oriental mustard (golden yellow seed coat colored version of B. juncea) is used in Japan for about half of its edible oil-requirement [11]. Believed to be originated in India over 3000 years ago, rapeseed (B. napus) (also known as Argentine rape, Swede rape, and colza) was introduced into China and Japan, carried out to Europe in the nineteenth century, and was eventually introduced into Canada in 1936 by Polish travelers [14]. B. napus is of commercial value in Canada and Australia. In particular, Winter types of B. napus are largely grown under north European, Chinese, and Canadian conditions [8].

2.3 Soybean

Native to East Asia (central China) and recognized as the ‘golden bean’ or the ‘miracle bean’, soybean (Glycine max L.) is an erect, bushy, herbaceous, annual, self-pollinated, and diploid legume, which belongs to family Leguminosae (sub-family: Fabaceae). Morphological, cytogenetic, and molecular analyses have indicated the domestication of G. max from its wild relative (G. soja) in East Asia 6000-9000 years ago. Additionally, before its spread to huge G. max yield-producing America and Brazil (in the last 100 years), G. max was first introduced into Japan, Korea, and Southeast Asia [15, 16]. G. max seed-oil (18–20% of the dry weight of seed) is nutritionally very important as it possess five most abundant fatty acids (palmitic, stearic, oleic, linoleic, and linolenic acids) and exhibits arachidic acid (1–3%) and polyunsaturated/saturated ratio of 4:1. Lecithin (phosphatidylcholine), phospholipids, tocopherols, and phytosterols also occur in G. max seed-oil. Given numerous human health benefits, G. max is in its high demand particularly in Northeast Asian countries including China, Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Russia [17].

2.4 Flax(lin)seed

An ancient annual herbaceous and a self-pollinated plant, linseed or flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) belongs to Linaceae family and has its uncertain origin. However, east of the Mediterranean Sea toward India (having a very diverse forms of L. usitatissimum) is argued as the centre of its origin. L. usitatissimum has also been considered a native of West Asia and the Mediterranean coastal lands, Asia Minor, Egypt, Algeria, Tunis, Spain, Italy, and Greece, where fiber types (fiber type L. usitatissimum) of this plant were cultivated. On the other hand, seed-type L. usitatissimum for expressible oil was grown in Southwest Asia, including Turkestan, Afghanistan, and India [18]. L. usitatissimum attains 60-100 cm length, and has non-shattering capsules. The seed-type L. usitatissimum is shorter and more branched, when compared to slender and more branched fiber type L. usitatissimum. L. usitatissimum is widely distributed in the northern hemisphere (Canada, United States, Russia, China and India), where it is cultivated for its seed-oil (40% of its seed weight) and stem fiber (linen) [19]. Though L. usitatissimum seed-oil (linseed oil) components depend on seed cultivar, location, environmental condition, and methods of analysis, its seed-oil is enriched in nutritionally important omega-3 fatty acids including α-linolenic acid (an n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid), and a good content of the important bioactive components (Figure 4). Linseed oil is particularly rich in total unsaturated fatty acids (87.8-89.8%). Hence, linseed oil is in its great demand as a dietary supplement and is also recognized as nutraceutical and functional food owing to numerous known and potential human health benefits of bioactive components therein [20, 21].

Figure 4.

Schematic representation of the major bioactive components available in flax(lin)seed-oil [20, 21].

2.5 Sunflower

Originated from a Mexico native wild sunflower, Helianthus lenticularis Douglas (Greek term, Helios = sun; Anthos: a flower), sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is a fast-growing diploid species (2n = 2x = 34) annual herb and is thought indigenous to central and eastern North America (and/or south-west United States-Mexico area and western Canada). Mainly commercialized in Russia, H. annuus is cultivated worldwide, extensively in sub-tropical and temperate regions, and its cultivation is spreading to tropical regions. A representative member of family Compositae (Asteraceae), H. annuus, is an erect, hardy, often unbranched, coarse, and stout-stemmed having a varying height up to 4.2 m and with a decorative flower head composed of disc florets in its centre and surrounded ray flowers [22, 23]. H. annuus seed-oil (22–55% of seed dry weight) is nutritionally valued for its high content of approximately 15% saturated and 85% unsaturated fatty acids. Its oil has multifaceted therapeutic benefits including attenuation of cardiovascular and inflammatory diseases, and antimicrobial, antioxidant, and antihypertensive benefits, among others [22].

2.6 Sesame

A native of Africa, China, and India, sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) is considered as the oldest known oilseed crop. It was domesticated nearly 3000 years ago and was the first known oil consumed by humans [24]. Domestication of S. indicum in South India has taken place about 1500 years ago [25]. It belongs to family Pedaliaceae and is recognized as the queen of oilseeds owing to its high value seed-oil quality and plethora of nutritive substances [26]. The genus Sesamum is one among the 13 genera of the family Pedaliaceae. In particular, S. indicum, together with S. capense, S. malabaricum and S. schenckii, has the somatic number 2n = 26; S. laciniatum, 2n = 28; S. angolase and S. prostratum, 2n = 32; S. occidentale; and S. radiatum, 2n = 64 [27]. S. indicum is an annual or biannual and self-pollinated herb with tall and branched (having an indeterminate growth habit) ridges bearing stems and mostly with solitary, axillary, shortly pedicellate, and zygomorphic flowers in white color (pink, purple, or various shades of purple-white flowers also occur). The fatty acid composition of S. indicum seed-oil comprises oleic acid (43%), linoleic acid (35%), palmitic acid (11%), and stearic acid (7%), which together contribute to 96% of total fatty acid content [4]. Given these, S. indicum seed-oil promotes health and also provides relief from hypertension, oxidative stress, and neurodegenerative diseases [28].

2.7 Safflower

An annual, erect, herbaceous, highly branched, spiny (leaves and bracts), thistle-like plant, safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) belongs to the family Asteraceae (Compositae), attains from 30 to 150 cm height, and has a chromosome number of 2n = 24 [29]. A minor, underutilized, and xerophilous oilseed crop, C. tinctorius is the only cultivated representative of genus Carthamus. Based on the archaeological records, C. tinctorius was established in north-western India during the Chalcolithic culture, and thereafter, it was distributed to the other regions. Three major centres: Ethiopia, the Iran-Afghanistan area, and India were assumed by Nikolai Vavilov (1887-1943) as the centres of origin of Carthamus sp. [30]. Moreover seven centres of similarity: (i) The Far East (China and Korea), (ii) India-Pakistan, (iii) Middle East, (iv) Egypt, (v) Sudan, (vi) Ethiopia, and (vii) Europe were the regions, where the Carthamus spp. crop was mainly cultivated [31]. The hypothesis of these seven centres of similarity were also corroborated with molecular characterization of genetic diversity, population structure, and similarity centres for 131 Carthamus sp. accessions obtained from 28 countries using 12 Inter Simple Sequence Repeat markers [32]. In particular, C. tinctorius was domesticated from its putative wild ancestor, C. palestinus, about 4500 years ago. C. tinctorius is thought to be native to parts of Asia (northern China and India), the Middle East (Iran and Iraq), and Africa and Mediterranean basin and is grown in arid and semi-arid regions in the world [33]. Moreover, based on phylogenetic analysis, C. tinctorius has diverged from artichokes (Cynara cardunculus) and Helianthus annuus, approximately 30.7 and 60.5 million years ago, respectively [34]. C. tinctorius yields high quality 32-40% seed-oil, which is rich in bioactive components including polyunsaturated fatty acids (with linoleic acid being predominant at 70%), monounsaturated oleic acid (10%), small amounts of stearic acid, flavonoids, alkaloids, and poly-alkenes. These bioactive components are valued for human health reasons, and helps in significantly reducing blood cholesterol levels [35]. C. tinctorius seed-oil also helps in the management of coronary heart disease, hypertension, dysmenorrhoea, and amenorrhoea [35].

2.8 Niger

Another minor, neglected or underutilized crop, niger (Guizotia abyssinica L.) is native to the Ethiopian highlands [36]. The genus Guizotia has its centre of origin, distribution, and genetic diversity in Ethiopia, where G. abyssinica has been domesticated, and is only cultivated out of the six species in genus Guizotia. A stout, erect annual, and moderately to well-branched dicotyledonous herb, G. abyssinica belongs to the Compositae (Asteraceae) family and has soft, hairy, and hollow stem and a well-developed taproot system (with many lateral roots); grows up to 2 m tall; has hermaphroditic disk florets; and has a diploid genome constituting (2n = 2x = 30) chromosome number. G. abyssinica is mainly planted for its edible oil in India and Ethiopia. It is also cultivated at small scale in several other African and Asian countries [37]. As a good source of oil, G. abyssinica exhibits its oil-yielding capacity between 28 and 50%. The occurrence of a high amount of linoleic acid (C 18:2) as the main fatty acid in its oil makes G. abyssinica nutritionally valuable and attractive. Additionally, G. abyssinica seed-oil has been a good source of phytochemicals and antioxidants, known for busting many life-threatening diseases including cancer and cardiovascular ailments [38].

Advertisement

3. Major constraints, impacts, and mitigation

3.1 Pea(ground)nut

A. hypogaea seed yield and quality are mainly limited by both abiotic stresses (extreme temperatures, drought, and extreme soil factors) and biotic stresses (pod borers, aphids, mites as insect pests and leaf spots, rusts and toxin producing Aspergillus fungus among the diseases) [39]. Drought stress is known to impact stabilization and productivity of Fabaceae crops including A. hypogaea [40]. Improved growth, yields, quality, and economics were observed in summer A. hypogaea, employing agronomic management, which comprised irrigation scheduling, mulching and integrated nutrient management [41]. The supply of auxiliary combined applications of cobalt and chelated zinc to drought-stressed A. hypogaea increased the capacity of this crop for nutrient absorption and water-use-efficiency and eventually improved its yield [42]. Identifying the most sensitive growth stage to water stress and understanding its consequences were argued essential for developing technologies aimed at enhancing the performance of crops (such as A. hypogaea) in water-limited environments [43]. Several genetic manipulations have been done in A. hypogaea for its improved tolerance to major abiotic stresses including drought [44, 45] and high salinity [46, 47]. Molecular genetic efforts have also been made to enhance to a great extent the resistance of A. hypogaea to the major biotic stresses such as pests/insects Spodoptera litura [48], and Holotrichia parallela larvae [49].

3.2 Cruciferous oilseeds

Abiotic stresses known impact the growth and productivity of Brassica oilseed crops including drought, temperature, and soil salinity [50, 51]. On the other hand, Brassica oilseed crop-health and productivity can also be impacted by biotic stresses such as fungal pathogens (Alternaria brassicae, which causes Alternaria leaf blight; Albugo candida, which causes white rust; Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, which causes Sclerotinia stem rot; Erysiphe cruciferarum, which causes powdery mildew; Leptosphaeria maculans and L. biglobosa, which cause blackleg disease; and Hyaloperonospora parasitica, which causes downy mildew), bacterial diseases (black rot, caused by Xanthomonas campestris, and leaf blight, caused by Pseudomonas syringae), and viral diseases (caused by Turnip yellows virus, cauliflower mosaic virus, and turnip mosaic virus) [50, 51]. Conventional breeding is difficult to develop varieties resistant to the mentioned fungal diseases due to unavailability of disease-resistant germplasm and also due to lack of sufficient innate resistance to these fungal diseases in most oilseed Brassicas such as B. juncea. Transgenic B. juncea cultivars produced by insertion of the WRR4 gene, exhibited their broad-spectrum resistance to white rust [52]. Earlier, using a B. juncea-B. napus line and a B. carinata-B. napus line, possible genomic regions of interest for blackleg resistance genes were analyzed in the B. juncea genome [53]. B. juncea, B. napus, and B. carinata exhibited more tolerance to Alternaria blight when compared to B. rapa [54]. Overexpression of NPR1 (non-expressor of pathogen-related gene 1) in B. juncea was conferred the broad spectrum resistance of this oilseed crop to major fungal pathogens such as Alternaria brassicae and Erysiphe cruciferarum [50]. Sclerotinia stem rot (caused by a plant pathogenic fungus, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) causes extensive yield losses world-wide in Brassica oilseed crops. To this end, marker trait associations for resistance against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum were detected in B. juncea-Erucastrum cardaminoides introgression lines [55]. An effective qualitative and quantitative resistance against the globally predominant Xanthomonas campestris races (such as R1 and R4) was observed in B. juncea [5657]. Resistance to Turnip Mosaic Virus was shown to be enhanced by BjAOX1a (an oxidase gene), which was cloned from B. juncea [58].

Drought stress was reported to cause significant yield losses in B. juncea [59]. The supply of methyl jasmonate and Pseudomonas fluorescens to drought stress-exposed B. juncea improved its drought tolerance by strengthening antioxidative defense mechanisms, elevating secondary metabolite production, and promoting osmolyte accumulation [59]. A differential regulation of certain genes and transcription factors was observed in drought-exposed B. juncea [60, 61]. The study also enlightened the coding transcripts, which, in turn, could be associated with drought tolerance traits in B. juncea [60, 61]. Salinity stress can also impact the growth, development, and productivity in oilseed Brassicas including B. juncea [62, 63, 64]. Nitrogen availability was found to regulate proline and ethylene production, which eventually alleviated salinity stress in B. juncea [62]. A salt-tolerant Pseudomonas species was found to ameliorate salinity stress and stimulate the growth of B. juncea [64]. In a recent study, 24-epibrassinolide-mediated alleviation of salinity stress in B. juncea involved 24-epibrassinolide-mediated regulation of functional components of nitric oxide (NO) signaling and antioxidant defense pathways [63]. Ectopic overexpression of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase gene (Apx1) improved salinity stress tolerance in B. juncea by strengthening antioxidative defense mechanisms [65]. In B. carinata-derived B. juncea introgression lines, quantitative trait loci (QTL)-conferring drought tolerance was performed, and over 15 candidate genes related to biotic and abiotic stresses were reported in the genomic regions of identified QTLs [66].

Elevated temperature regimes (such as heat stress) were also reported to limit the growth and productivity of oilseed Brassica crops [67]. Differentially expressed genes and key pathways were analyzed in heat-stressed B. napus using bioinformatics tools [67]. Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) have enlightened genomic regions and QTLs controlling various traits known to be affected by heat stress in B. napus [68] and B. rapa [69]. In particular, QTLs for heat stress tolerance in B. rapa were found distributed across the genome [69]. Moreover, the occurrence of QTL was also found in diverse genetic groups, flowering phenologies, and morphotypes [69]. Several transcription factors known to play regulatory roles in heat stress responses were also identified in B. napus [70, 71]. Additionally, major gene families involved in controlling different hormonal signaling networks during heat stress were also explored in B. napus [72]. Utilization of a number of crop wild relatives (CWRs) of B. juncea was recommended for biotic and abiotic stress management in B. juncea (Figure 5) [51, 73]. It was argued that these CWRs may serve as resourceful gene pools for introgression of stress resilience traits.

Figure 5.

Representation of the major crop wild relatives of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss.) [51, 73].

3.3 Soybean

The list of important abiotic stresses reported to impact the productivity and chemical composition of Glycine max oilseeds includes drought, temperature, and salinity. Drought stress decreased linoleic and linolenic acids; whereas, an elevated accumulation of oleic acid argued an adaptive mechanism for the maintenance of cell turgor in drought-stressed G. max [74]. Yield of seed and its oil and also the seed-oil fatty acid composition can be impacted by elevated soil salinity [75]. The major effects of drought and salinity were ascertained in G. max employing transcriptomics studies [76]. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated hairy-root transformation was employed for G. max gene functional research [77]. Eventually, CRISPR/Cas9 system was extensively used in G. max gene functional study [78, 79, 80]. It was also employed in improving the major G. max traits, including abiotic stress (herbicide) tolerance and disease resistance [78, 79, 80]. Actin depolymerization factor (GmADF13) was functionally characterized in G. max, where GmADF13 was found responsible for drought stress resistance [81]. Recently, the major genetics underlying red crown rot disease-resistance was identified and dissected in a diverse G. max germplasm population [82].

3.4 Flax(lin)seed

In Asian countries (particularly India), oil-type L. usitatissimum mainly suffers from drought, salinity, and heat in addition to biotic stress factors such as Fusarium oxysporum, Septoria linicola, and Melampsora lini. Interestingly, due to its hardiness, L. usitatissimum is known to tolerate drought when compared to many other oil and food crops. However, two major reasons, namely, the occurrence of a shallow root system and the transpiration of a high amount of water owing to high transpiration coefficient (value of 787-1093), make this plant more susceptible to drought stress [83]. Drought stress (water scarcity) continues to be a significant impediment to L. usitatissimum production. To this end, understanding the ‘root system architecture’ can be pivotal in order to improve water-acquisition in L. usitatissimum. However, knowledge is still meager in L. usitatissimum [84, 85]. Research is also meager on the identification of drought-resilient genotypes and genome-wide analysis of drought-induced gene expression in L. usitatissimum [86, 87]. Soil salinity-alkalinity was reported to impact L. usitatissimum germination and emergence, seedling survival, growth, and productivity [88]. Identification of salinity-tolerant lines has been done in few studies [89, 90]. Additionally, important genes responsible for conferring salt tolerance were also identified [91].

Notably, L. usitatissimum is a cool season crop. The production and viability of pollen and seed set, and the quality and quantity of seed-oil in L. usitatissimum can be impacted by heat stress (40°C) [92, 93]. Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lini was reported to cause wilt disease in L. usitatissimum and can cause 80–100% yield loss [94]. Genetic improvement and adaptive breeding for high temperature stress tolerance in L. usitatissimum can be accelerated with a comprehensive characterization of heat shock factor (HSF) candidate genes [95]. Genomic insights into HSFs were enlightened a candidate gene (LusHSF) for high temperature stress-adaptation and gene editing with minimal off-target effects in L. usitatissimum [95]. Drought-, salinity-, cold- and heat-associated NAC-domain transcription factor genes (LuNACs) were discovered and functionally characterized in L. usitatissimum [93]. A nuclear magnetic resonance-metabolomics-based tool was developed to select L. usitatissimum varieties with better nutrient profile [96]. The de novo genome of L. usitatissimum-rust pathogen Melampsora lini was sequenced, and putative protein coding genes were identified [97]. Important insights into the genetic architecture and genomic prediction of powdery mildew-resistance were enlightened in L. usitatissimum [98]. Drought and salinity impacts were ascertained in L. usitatissimum employing transcriptomics studies [99]. In order to efficiently exploit CRISPR-Cas9 technology in L. usitatissimum, a guideline was made available for designing guide RNA, assembling DNA fragments, and also for preparing a detailed protocol for protoplast isolation, transfection, and mutation detection [100].

3.5 Sunflower

Temperature and water regimes and exposure to soil salinity during the phenological development of Helianthus annuus plants were reported to impact its seed yield and also the seed-oil quality [101, 102, 103]. For its optimal growth and development, H. annuus plants require 15–35°C mean daily temperatures [101]. Unfortunately, H. annuus shows susceptibility to heat stress (elevated temperature). H. annuus exposed to elevated threshold temperature during its reproductive stage exhibited negative impacts on fertilization, grain-filling, embryo growth, seed number, seed growth, seed weight, and seed-oil characteristics [102]. A constant seven-day exposure of H. annuus to high temperatures of ≥35°C, during grain-filling, strongly modified seed-oil fatty acid composition [103]. H. annuus is considered a moderately drought-resistant oilseed crop and is adapted to low water-input regimes in warm to semi-arid zones, owing to its well-developed tap roots [104]. Water deficit reduced seed yield (16.3%), oil yield (22.5%), and linolenic and palmitic acid (29.8 and 28.5%, respectively) [35]. Soil salinity can cause over 55% reduction in H. annuus production worldwide [105, 106]. Enhanced growth and production were observed in salinity-exposed H. annuus supplied with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PF23 [105] and fluorescent Pseudomonas sp. PF17 [106]. Transcriptomics studies ascertained the effects of drought and salinity stresses in H. annuus [107]. Recently, the characterization of the genetic control of abiotic stress-related specialized metabolites was performed in H. annuus [108]. Putatively annotated 30 compounds were found to be associated to seven most likely candidate genes with varied functions [108]. An integrated omics approach (comprising genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and phenomics) was recommended for efficient genetic improvement in H. annuus breeding [109].

Two major diseases, namely, downy mildew (caused by Plasmopara halstedii) and H. annuus rust (caused by Puccinia helianthin), and a holo-parasitic flowering plant species, broomrape (Orobanche cumana) cause significant damages to H. annuus growth and productivity [110, 111, 112, 113]. In particular, downy mildew constitutes a significant risk factor during H. annuus production [111]. An integrated pest management approach against H. annuus downy mildew was recommended [111]. Moreover, among the downy mildew resistance inducers tested (azadirachtin, AZA; benzothiadiazole, BTH; Trichoderma asperellum) in in vivo experiments, BTH, T. asperellum, and the highest dose of AZA (0.2%) significantly reduced downy mildew symptoms in H. annuus [113]. H. annuus rust is another robust and economically important disease, which is known to cause significant damages and yield reductions in infected fields [110, 112]. Mutation and sequencing-based cloning and functional studies of a rust resistance gene were performed in H. annuus [112]. Most of the rust resistance genes (R genes), described so far, were found monogenic dominant. Orobanche cumana infects H. annuus roots in large areas of Europe and Asia, where it caused significant yield loss (up to 100%) [110, 114]. Seed pre-treatment with brassinosteroids was reported to stimulate H. annuus immunity against O. cumana infection [115].

3.6 Sesame

Due to changes in consumer lifestyle and health awareness programmes, the consumption of S. indicum is increasing globally, which is forecasted to be 100 million metric tonnes by 2030 [116]. However, a number of factors including: a narrow genetic base; the shattering of the seed-bearing capsule of S. indicum at harvest and eventual unsuitability of this crop for mechanized harvesting; cultivation in marginal lands with poor management practices; and lack of production strategies has caused perceptible declines in both the global cultivated area of sesame and its yield potential [24, 117]. This list also includes exposure of sesame crops to many biotic and abiotic stresses; inefficient processing technology; and also the shifting in cultivation to other cash crops. The cultivated S. indicum is sensitive to salinity [118], drought [119], and waterlogging [120]. An elevated accumulation of an osmolyte proline (a good stabilizer of proteins and a regulator of cytosolic pH) was linked to a higher tolerance to salinity (50 and 100 mM NaCl) in S. indicum cv. Cumhuriyet [118]. Omics technologies have also differentially improved S. indicum-tolerance to major biotic and abiotic stresses [121, 122].

The growth and productivity of S. indicum may also be limited by phyllody (replacement of parts of a flower or the entire flower with leafy structures), which is associated with phloem-limiting phytoplasma, intracellular pathogens in Mollicutes class [24, 123]. S. indicum phyllody primarily spreads via leafhopper species, with Orosius orientalis as the major vector. Unfortunately, complete phytoplasma genome sequencing has not been undertaken yet [24]. Dry root rot (caused by a soil-borne Deuteromycetes fungus, Macrophomina phaseolina) is another widespread and destructive disease of S. indicum [24, 124]. Major disease-resistance mechanism against M. phaseolina involved 52 differentially expressed genes associated with different signaling pathways [125]. Earlier, Fusarium wilt-resistant genotype of S. indicum (Sanliurfa-63,189) was also identified [126]. Moreover, out of 28 S. indicum genotypes screened under field conditions, resistance of S2 and H4 cultivars of S. indicum to Fusarium wilt was reported [127].

Predicted through RNA-seq data analysis, a well-annotated data resource for transcriptomic signatures of abiotic and biotic stress responses, ‘Sesame Genomic Web Resource (SesameGWR)’ was recently developed in S. indicum [117]. SesameGWR is expected to boost the mining of various stress-associated genes and the molecular breeding of S. indicum. It will also help in developing climate-resilient S. indicum varieties and eventually in enhancing its growth and productivity (Figure 6) [117].

Figure 6.

Schematic representation of the key areas of contributions of Sesame Genomic Web Resource (SesameGWR), which is a well-annotated data resource for transcriptomic signatures of abiotic and biotic stress responses in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) [117].

3.7 Safflower

Naturally gifted with a strong and deep tap root (which can grow to a depth of 2-3 m), C. tinctorius thrives under dry/xerophytic climates and marginal lands through extracting water from deeper soil layers (up to 5 feet). Mainly doing this, C. tinctorius satisfies its water requirements. Hence, C. tinctorius is considered a moderately tolerant oilseed crop to drought stress [128]. Despite this, varied abiotic stresses (including temperature and the soil moisture) were reported to severely impact C. tinctorius growth, development and the yield of oilseeds and seed-oil, and seed-oil quality. Exposure of C. tinctorius to drought stress during its flowering and seed filling stages was detrimental on its seed yield [129, 130]. Similarly, drought stress at the heading stage decreased seed and oil yields in C. tinctorius [131]. Moreover, drought stress was reported to decrease in C. tinctorius the yield of seed (9.4%) and oil (10.2%) and also linolenic acid (29.8%) and palmitic acids (28.5%) [35]. A higher proportion of oleic acid as compared to linoleic acid was observed in C. tinctorius exposed to a terminal heat stress [132]. The sowing dates, genotype characteristics, and the climate variability were also reported to significantly impact C. tinctorius yield, oil, and fatty acids [133, 134]. Several innovative approaches for genetic improvement of C. tinctorius stress resistance were also explored [135, 136].

Important biotic stresses including leaf spot disease (caused by Alternaria carthami, Cercospora carthami, and Ramularia carthami), wilts (caused by Fusarium oxysporum and Verticillium alboatrum), powdery mildew (caused by Leveillula taurica), Phytophthora root rot (caused by several fungus-like organisms in the genus Phytophthora, including P. cactorum and P. cryptogea), and insects such as aphids and C. tinctorius fly are known to hamper C. tinctorius growth and productivity [137138]. Several insect pests also impact C. tinctorius health and productivity [139, 140]. To this end, Acanthiophilus helianthi, Helicoverpa armigera, and Uroleucon carthami were mainly found to diminish the productivity of C. tinctorius up to 35–80% [139]. Genetic mapping revealed two major QTLs (QUc-Ct3.1 and QUc-Ct5.1) associated with tolerance to the aphid, Uroleucon compositae, in C. tinctorius [140].

3.8 Niger

Major factors contributing to decreased growth and productivity in G. abyssinica include abiotic stresses, pathogens/diseases and parasitic weeds, low response to inputs, seed shattering due to indeterminate growth habit, lodging, insect pests, and diseases [36, 141, 142, 143, 144]. Drought stress-caused differential growth and physiological alterations were observed in G. abyssinica cultivars [145]. Soil salinity is also a major constraint for the cultivation of G. abyssinica [141, 143]. Genomic identification of salt-induced microRNAs was done in G. abyssinica, which helped to get insights into the post-transcriptional regulatory aspect of the applied salt stress responses [143]. G. abyssinica is an outcrossing edible oilseed crop and has highly limited genomic resources. To this end, RNA-Seq-based transcriptome sequencing of G. abyssinica genotypes provided novel genomic resources for this crop and also revealed microsatellite frequency and distribution in its transcriptome [146]. The list of important diseases of G. abyssinica includes Alternaria blight (caused by Alternaria porii and A. alternata), leaf spot (caused by Cercospora guizoticola), seedling blight (caused by Alternaria tenuis), seed rot (caused by Rhizoctonia bataticola), rust (caused by Puccinia guizotiae), powdery mildew (caused by Sphaerotheca sp.), and root rot (caused by Macrophomina phaseolina) [142, 144]. Association of Golovinomyces ambrosiae and Podosphaera xanthii was investigated in causing powdery mildew disease of G. abyssinica in India [144].

Advertisement

4. Major breeding aims and progress

Edible seed-oils are preferred for domestic consumption due to their nutritional quality and numerous human health benefits. Edible seed-oil quality is largely based on the proportion of various fatty acids and other bioactive components. Recent breeding efforts in edible oilseed crops explored approaches for enhancing the quality of edible seed-oils through altering their major fatty acids and also other bioactive components. Major outcomes of the representative research done on improving the major seed traits (such as size, weight, yield, and oil quality) in specific edible oilseed crops under the umbrella of important breeding programmes are briefly highlighted hereunder.

4.1 Pea(ground)nut

A. hypogaea is a self-pollinated crop with cleistogamous flowers and exhibits limited genetic variation. To this end, gamma irradiation-mediated induced mutations was reported to develop A. hypogaea mutants (M1 generation) with improved morphological and quantitative characteristics and also with seeds having enhanced biochemical composition [147]. Moreover, a large number of mutant varieties (3402) (via gamma irradiation) was released through breeding in the world [148]. Induced biofortification of Fe and Zn metal ions in A. hypogaea oilseeds through a range of molecular-genetic and other approaches was also explored [149, 150]. Genetic, genomic, and breeding efforts have improved the A. hypogaea health and productivity and also the nutritional quality of its oilseeds [7]. Efforts have been made to address the major key challenges of A. hypogaea grain nutrient quality, minimizing carcinogenic and immunosuppressive aflatoxin contamination [151] and allergens [152], and improving oleic acid profile in its oil [153]. Quality traits (e.g., seed-oil and protein) were reported to have predominantly qualitative inheritance [154]. However, quantitative inheritances were also reported for seed-oil content and quality in A. hypogaea [155]. A. hypogaea has also been the focus of breeding programmes focused on developing its short duration and high-yielding varieties/hybrids [156, 157]. Fatty acid desaturase 2 (FAD2) enzymes are involved in the catalysis of the conversion of oleic acid to linoleic acid. At the same time, the oleic acid to linoleic acid conversion is argued as an important regulatory point linked both to improved abiotic stress responses, and the ratio of these two components decides the seed-oil quality [158]. Undertaking a CRISPR/Cas9-based site-specific genome modification approach, FAD2 cis-regulatory motifs were modified in A. hypogaea [158].

4.2 Cruciferous oilseeds

The development of cultivars with varied fatty acid composition to suit specific nutritional and industrial needs has been in focus of breeding programmes in cruciferous oilseeds. Notably, the pod-shattering trait has been reported to negatively affect the crop yield in oilseed Brassicas especially under dry conditions. Hence, identification of key genes and unraveling the pod-shattering mechanism thoroughly was argued which is very important for both understanding the trait better and also for cultivating higher resistance varieties [159]. Novel quantitative trait loci from an interspecific B. rapa derivative improved pod-shatter resistance in B. napus [160]. Moreover, major genes associated with senescence and polygalacturonase activity involved in pod shattering were unveiled in B. napus employing a comparative transcriptome and co-expression network analysis [160]. Expression divergence of FRUITFULL homeologs enhanced pod shatter resistance in B. napus [161]. Introgression of the B. rapa genome was exploited to expand the genetic variation of B. juncea [162]. Phenotypic variations for pod shattering, pod length and number of seeds per pod were investigated in large germplasm collections of B. juncea and its progenitor species, B. rapa and B. nigra [163].

Breeding programmes in cruciferous oilseeds are also focused on a very-long-chain monounsaturated fatty acid, erucic acid (C22:1, ω-9). An optimum level of erucic acid (low-erucic acid) (nationwide range: 2-5%) is important for health safety reasons. Low erucic acid B. napus seed-oil possess a large amount of unsaturated fatty acids (90%) and vitamin E. B. napus seed-oil has unique absorption rate by the human body (99%). Hence, the low erucic acid B. napus seed-oil is a nutritionally valuable edible oil and also occupies an important position in the food industry [164, 165, 166]. Low erucic acid B. napus seed-oil has also been granted Substances Generally Recognized as Safe status in the United States [164, 165, 166]. Notably, before the development of low erucic acid B. napus (with 0.36-3.0%), erucic acid content of B. napus seed-oil generally ranged from 45 to 50%. The loss-of-function mutations in the FAE1 (Fatty Acid Elongase 1) gene and the FAE2 (Fatty Acid Elongase 2) gene was revealed as the current selection for low erucic acid B. napus [166, 167]. A targeted mutation of the 845th base of FAE1 resulted in a dramatic decrease in erucic acid content, which led to the development of world’s first zero-erucic acid B. napus ‘Oro’ [168]. RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated inhibition of FAE1 gene expression helped in decreasing erucic acid content of B. napus from 40% to less than 3% [169]. Intron-spliced hairpin RNA (ihpRNA)-mediated inhibition of FAE1 gene expression decreased the erucic acid content of B. napus from 40% to 0.36% [170]. RNAi-mediated inhibition of BnaFAE1 and BnaFAD2 (Brassica napus fatty acidΔ12-desaturase 2) expression decreased erucic acid content of low erucic acid B. napus from 0.87% to undetectable levels [171].

Since the first application of CRISPR/Cas9, B. napus genome editing was initiated, a critical mass of its genes were mutated [172, 173]. Eventually a valuable germplasm resource was generated for B. napus fundamental biological research and novel variety cultivation [172, 173]. For instance, CRISPR/Cas9 technology-assisted creation of targeted mutations on BnaFAE1 (BnaA08.FAE1 and BnaC03.FAE1) helped in the reduction of erucic acid content to nearly zero in B. napus [171]. Moreover, elevated seed-oil and protein content and altered fatty acid composition were obtained in B. napus mutants by knocking out the BnTT8 gene mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 [172].

4.3 Soybean

The major breeding programmes for G. max aimed at improving the yield of its seed and seed-oil, protein and seed-oil composition and quality and also at its tolerance to the major biotic and abiotic stresses [174]. GWAS were performed for understanding insights into the modulators of seed-oil (and seed protein) G. max [175, 176]. A comprehensive GWAS identified QTLs for seed-oil contents and identified five genomic regions associated with seed-oil content [176]. A large portion of a selected region in the G. max genome was found occupied by overlapping QTL regions related to oil content [177]. G. max lines exhibiting stable oleic acid and linolenic acid across environments may be used as a source of germplasms with a desirable fatty acid composition [178]. G. max genetic transformation has become a valuable tool for the functional study of genes and the production of agronomically improved plants [77].

CRISPR/Cas9 system has enlightened G. max gene functions and has also improved important G. max traits, including yield, quality, and stress tolerance [78, 79, 80]. Based on the CRISPR/Cas9 system, stable male sterile lines were produced in G. max using the ABORTED MICROSPORES (AMS) homologs, where GmAMS1 produced male sterile lines, whereas GmAMS2 failed to produce [79]. Genetic regulatory networks of the G. max traits (seed size, oil and protein contents), and also the major strategies for improving the same, were also explored [179, 180]. GWAS and RNA-seq have identified GmWRI1-like transcription factor related to the seed weight in G. max [181]. Recently, GWAS was performed, and candidate gene mining of G. max seed size traits was done [182]. Major fatty acid desaturase genes were manipulated in G. max employing different molecular techniques such as induced mutagenesis [183], RNA interference [184], transcription activator-like effector nucleases genome editing [185], and CRISPR-cas9-mediated genome editing [186187]. G. max triacylglycerol lipase GmSDP1 gene was reported to regulate the quality and quantity of seed-oil [188]. Transcription regulation of oil accumulation in G. max seeds was also enlightened [189, 190]. G. max WRINKLED1 transcription factor, GmWRI1a was found to positively regulate seed-oil accumulation [190]. Moreover, oil accumulation in G. max seeds was altered by modifying biosynthetic genes [191, 192]. A high-monounsaturated fatty acid G. max seed-oil was also successfully produced using GmPDCTs knockout via a CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing system [193].

4.4 Flax(lin)seed

The breeding programmes for L. usitatissimum largely aimed at improving yield of seed and oil and the quality of seed-oil [194, 195, 196, 197]. Several QTLs for fatty acid composition and yield in L. usitatissimum were unveiled [195]. Three QTL each for oleic acid and stearic acid and two QTL each for linoleic acid and iodine value and one each for palmitic acid, linolenic acid, oil content were discovered [195]. These agronomic- and quality traits-associated QTLs may help in marker-assisted breeding as well as map-based cloning of key genes in L. usitatissimum. Earlier, GWAS have helped in the identification of single-nucleotide polymorphisms related to oil quality attributes [196, 197]. An association of seed color variation with yield and quality traits was observed in a diversity panel of L. usitatissimum [198]. Altered fatty acid content and composition (especially the increase of oleic acid content) were reported in L. usitatissimum employing the approaches based on RNA interference of FAD2 gene encoding the enzyme Fatty Acid Desaturase 2 [194]. Introduction of Primula vialii-sourced Δ6-desaturase gene in L. usitatissimum increased therein the synthesis of ω-3 fatty acids [199]. Introduction of the Solanum sogarandinum glycosyltransferase (SsGT1) gene into L. usitatissimum genome elevated the accumulation of unsaturated fatty acids in L. usitatissimum seeds [200]. Significantly increased polyunsaturated fatty acids levels were observed in L. usitatissimum plants transformed with a chalcone synthase gene from Petunia hybrida [201]. The genetic diversity of stearoyl-ACP desaturase and fatty acid desaturase genes responsible for the fatty acid composition in L. usitatissimum cultivars and lines were investigated [202]. Heterosis for seed yield and its attributing traits in L. usitatissimum was also explored [203]. An apical meristem-targeted in planta transformation method can be promising for the successful development of transgenics in L. usitatissimum [204]. Genetic enhancement of major nutraceuticals was also attempted in L. usitatissimum [205].

4.5 Sunflower

The development of breeding H. annuus lines suitable for hybrid breeding, resistance to stresses (diseases, abiotic, biotic, and herbicides), and seed and oil yield and quality traits are mainly focused in H. annuus breeding [110, 206]. The fatty acid residue composition of the main oil lipids, triacylglycerides, and some of the minor lipids are the major determinants of the nutritional properties (and industrial use) of H. annuus seed-oil [207, 208]. QTLs controlling seed-oil content, oleic acid and linoleic acid content in H. annuus were mapped [209]. An F2 mapping population from cytoplasmic male-sterile line COSF 7A (33-35% oleic acid) was developed. Additionally, high oleic acid inbred line HO 5-13 (88-90% oleic acid) was also phenotyped for oil content and oleic acid and linoleic acid content at the F2 seed level [209]. The obtained QTLs may be useful in the marker-assisted selection breeding programme aimed at improving oil quality. Heterotic hybrids are required for the major improvements in H. annuus. These hybrids can be achieved by tapping combining ability of F1 hybrids developed from crossing of two genetically diverse female lines with male testers [210]. Mutation breeding has also been argued rewarding for changed oil quality in H. annuus oilseeds [211]. Recommendation has also been made to employ ‘pollen irradiation-mediated induction of haploid plants’ for speeding-up breeding in H. annuus [212]. Combined high-resolution lipidome phenotyping and genome-wide genotyping has unveiled novel genetic determinants of seed-oil fatty acid content in inbred H. annuus lines [208]. Nutragenomic approaches for understanding metabolic pathways of various quality traits in H. annuus was also explored [213].

4.6 Sesame

Over 27,000 genes and high genetic diversity in genes related to oil biosynthesis, resulting in variation in seed-oil content, were revealed through de novo-based assembly of the S. indicum genome [214]. Key genes associated with S. indicum seed-oil composition were identified in 705 accessions, where variation in seed-oil content was found associated with seed color [215]. GWAS have identified novel genes, SiLTP3 and SiACS8, which were found related to seed yield traits, such as capsule length and number [214, 216]. The Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia) developed and released a total of 32 improved S. indicum varieties through mass selection from among the local germplasm collections since 1976 [217]. Earlier, eight gamma ray (300-750 Gy)-induced closed capsule (indehiscent) mutants were obtained from four different Turkish cultivars of S. indicum [218]. Moreover, hybridization has helped in a successful recovery of high-yielding S. indicum plants from a progeny of 103 crosses [219]. Important variants in S. indicum (with improved seed-oil yield, composition and quality) were generated employing genome editing technology [220]. Several favorable genes, QTLs, and genotypes were also discovered, which would act as a valuable genetic resource for S. indicum improvement [221]. CRISPR/Cas9 system and CRISPR/Cas9 coupled with hairy root transformation-mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis was efficiently created, and the major gene functions were assessed in S. indicum [222]. With the highlighted research progress, S. indicum has been transformed from an ‘orphan crop’ to a ‘genomic resource-rich crop’.

4.7 Safflower

Unfortunately, the occurrence of low genetic diversity in C. tinctorius-breeding lines and cultivars restricts their utility in breeding programmes [223]. To overcome this issue, the prevalent genetic and phenotypic diversity among the global germplasm of C. tinctorius was extensively characterized. This has facilitated the identification of genetic determinants of trait variability and effective utilization of the prevalent diversity [224]. The genetic determinants of trait were also used in development of effective improvement programmes for C. tinctorius [224]. A scarcity of identified marker-trait associations is limiting the development of successful marker-assisted breeding programmes in C. tinctorius. To this end, a C. tinctorius panel (CartAP) comprising 124 accessions derived from two core collections was assayed for its suitability for association mapping [225]. The marker-trait associations were also identified, which are expected to facilitate marker-assisted breeding and identification of genetic determinants of trait variability in C. tinctorius [225]. Moreover, genetic variation among 131 C. tinctorius germplasm was argued to help in parental selection and the future breeding programmes for C. tinctorius [33]. Enhancements of γ-linolenic acid, α-linolenic acid, oleic acid, bioactive peptide, bioactive flavonoid, and stress resistance were also achieved [135, 136]. The miRNA expression pattern studied and novel miRNAs identified in developing seeds enlightened the role of miRNA in seed development and oil metabolism [226]. Genetic modification of C. tinctorius was also done for improved production of oils with distinct properties [227, 228]. The genetic origin and diversity of FAD2-1 were identified and characterized in C. tinctorius [229]. This result could aid C. tinctorius breeders in reducing population size and generations required for the development of new high oleic acid varieties using perfect molecular marker-assisted selection [229].

4.8 Niger

G. abyssinica is known for its multiuse and numerous human health benefits. However, the average productivity of G. abyssinica in most world regions (including Ethiopia and Indian subcontinent) is very low. This may be due to the natural indeterminate growth habit, shattering lodging, and self-incompatibility (strict out-crossing nature) of G. abyssinica and/or due to its sensitivity to weeds, pests, diseases, and insects [230, 231]. G. abyssinica has been the focus of the major oilseed breeding programmes [232, 233, 234]. Mutation breeding was adopted for isolating mutants with desirable traits including seed yield and oil content [234, 235]. Individual and combined levels of gamma rays (24, 26, and 28 kR) and ethyl methane sulphonate (0.2 and 0.4% v/v) tested in G. abyssinica seeds (cultivar N-71) varyingly increased grain yield and yield-related components [234]. G. abyssinica has a wide genetic basis, which may be used for the improvement of the species through conventional breeding and/or marker-assisted selection [230, 236]. Induced polyploidy has improved the major agronomic traits in economically important crop plants [237]. To this end, the tetraploidization in G. abyssinica plants (with larger capitula, larger seeds, and a greater number of seeds per capitula) was achieved by treating apical portion of in vitro-raised shoots with colchicine (0.02%) [233]. A highly efficient protocol for in vitro double haploid production was achieved employing anther culture, and Indian G. abyssinica varieties JNS 9 and JNS 28 were developed [238]. Moreover, double haploid was argued to develop inbred lines in a shorter time in problematic plants including G. abyssinica. Earlier, repeated selection and breeding increased oleic acid content from approximately 5-11% to 80-86% in G. abyssinica materials from Ethiopia [232]. Despite the highlighted above studies, G. abyssinica remained as an underutilized oilseed crop.

Advertisement

5. Conclusions and prospects

This chapter introduced the origin, key botanical insights, and the major health benefits of major herbaceous edible oilseed crops (A. hypogaea, B. juncea, B. campestris (syn. B. rapa), G. max, L. usitatissimum, H. annuus, S. indicum, C. tinctorius, and G. abyssinica) and overviewed the major constraints and their impacts on (and also enlightened important mitigation strategies adopted in) these major herbaceous edible oilseed crops. Additionally, it also highlighted the major aims and progress of important breeding programmes for the mentioned herbaceous edible oilseed crops (Table 1) (below).

Herbaceous edible oilseed-bearing plantsMajor breeding programme – outcomesReferences
Pea(ground)nut
(Arachis hypogaea L.)
Mutation (gamma irradiation-mediated) breeding-mediated release of mutant varieties with enhanced biochemical composition[147, 148]
Molecular-genetic and other approaches-mediated induction of biofortification of Fe and Zn metal ions in seeds[149, 150]
Grain nutrient quality, minimization of carcinogenic and immunosuppressive aflatoxin contamination and allergens, and improvement in seed-oil-oleic acid profile[151, 152, 153]
Developing its short duration and high yielding varieties/hybrids[156, 157]
CRISPR/Cas9-based site-specific genome modification approach-assisted unveiling of important insights into fatty acid desaturase 2 (FAD2) enzymes (involved in the catalysis of the conversion of oleic acid to linoleic acid)[158]
Cruciferous oilseeds
(Brassica juncea L. Czern. and Coss., and Brassica campestris L. syn. B. rapa)
Identification of key genes and unraveling the pod-shattering mechanism[159, 160, 161, 162, 163]
Long-chain monounsaturated fatty acid, erucic acid (C22:1, ω-9), and its optimum level[164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171]
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing for valuable germplasm resources, reduction of erucic acid content, elevated seed-oil and protein content, and altered fatty acid composition[171, 172, 173]
Soybean
(Glycine max L.)
Improving the yield of its seed and seed-oil protein and seed-oil composition and quality and its tolerance to the major biotic and abiotic stresses[174]
Understanding insights into the modulators of seed-oil (and seed protein)[175, 176]
CRISPR/Cas9 system-based production of stable male sterile lines[79, 80]
Identification of transcription factor related to the seed weight and size[181, 182]
Manipulation of major fatty acid desaturase genes[183, 184, 185, 186, 187]
Regulation of the quality and quantity of seed-oil[188, 189, 190]
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing system-assisted production of a high-monounsaturated fatty acid seed-oil[193]
Flax(lin)seed
(Linum usitatissimum L.)
Unveiling important QTLs for fatty acid composition and yield[195, 197]
Insights into the association of seed color variation with yield and quality traits[198]
Alteration of fatty acid content and composition[194, 199, 200, 201, 202]
Development of transgenics employing an apical meristem-targeted in planta transformation methods[204]
Genetic enhancement of major nutraceuticals[205]
Sunflower
(Helianthus annuus L.)
Development of breeding H. annuus lines suitable for hybrid breeding, resistance to stresses (diseases, abiotic, biotic, and herbicides) and seed and oil yield and quality traits[110, 206]
Insights into the modulation of seed-oil content and seed-oil-fatty acid composition (oleic acid and linoleic acid content)[209, 210, 211]
Pollen irradiation-mediated induction of haploid plants[212]
Combined high-resolution lipidome phenotyping and genome-wide genotyping-mediated unveiling of novel genetic determinants of seed-oil fatty acid content[208]
Nutragenomic approaches-assisted insights into the metabolic pathways of various quality traits[213]
Sesame
(Sesamum indicum L.)
Identification of key genes associated with seed-oil composition, seed color, and seed-oil content[215]
Identification of novel genes related to seed yield traits (such as capsule length and number)[214, 216]
Identification of closed capsule (indehiscent) mutants[218]
Hybridization-assisted recovery of high-yielding plants from progeny of large crosses[219]
Genome editing technology-mediated generation of the major variants (with improved seed-oil yield, composition, and quality)[220, 221, 222]
Safflower
(Carthamus tinctorius L.)
Extensive characterization-mediated identification of genetic determinants of trait variability and effective utilization of the prevalent diversity[223, 224]
Identification of marker-trait associations and identification of genetic determinants of trait variability[225]
Enhancements of γ-linolenic acid, α-linolenic acid, oleic acid, bioactive peptide, bioactive flavonoid, and stress resistance[135, 136]
Enlightening the role of miRNA in seed development and oil metabolism[226]
Identification and characterization of genetic origin and diversity of FAD2-1[229]
Niger
(Guizotia abyssinica L.)
Repeated selection and breeding-mediated increase in oleic acid content[232]
Tetraploidization-assisted achievement of cultivars with larger capitula, larger seeds, and a greater number of seeds per capitula[233]
Mutation breeding-mediated isolation of mutants with desirable traits including seed yield and oil content[234, 235]
Another culture-mediated production of in vitro double haploids[238]

Table 1.

Summary of important outcomes of the major breeding programmes on the herbaceous edible oilseed-bearing plants (discussed in the current chapter).

Despite the nutritional and economic values of most edible oilseed crops, many constraints, and challenges limit their production and commercialization. The progressing worldwide climate changes are bound to cause elevations in temperatures, drought, and soil salinity, which are critical stress components in global edible oilseed crop cultivation. Efforts must be made to further improve the current cultivation and agronomic practices employed for the discussed edible oilseed crop(plants). Edible oilseeds-sourced oils are important commodity worldwide, and the quality of edible oils is largely decides by the proportion therein of fatty acids and other bioactive components. Genetic engineering for creating edible oilseeds with new properties and also with modified fatty acid composition may be achieved through intensifying research on overexpression, post-transcriptional gene silencing, and genome editing. Breeding efforts should also be made to employ advanced backcross QTL tools to further improve both the quality and quantity of edible oils produced. Efforts should be made to screen both the wild relatives of the edible oilseed crops and also the germplasms collected from various geographical locations and different stressful environments, and eventually these should be incorporated into edible oilseed crops-breeding programmes. Moreover, enhancements in yield and quality of edible oilseeds may also be made through getting major insights into the physiological responses and underlying genetics of stress tolerance in edible oilseed crops. The knowledge of how temperature and water regimes, and exposure to soil salinity during the phenological developmental stages (particularly during grain-filling) is important for selecting an environment or stable hybrids to produce grains (seeds) with the desired weight and oil and quality (oil fatty acid composition).

Concerted efforts should also focus minor, underutilized, or neglected edible oilseed crops, such as G. abyssinica and C. tinctorius (in addition to the major and dominating edible oilseed crops), and increase their production and utilization. In order to implement genetic transformation on G. abyssinica, C. tinctorius, and other dominating edible oilseed crops, an establishment of a reproducible transformation protocol should be a priority task. Immense genetic potential of crop wild relatives (CWRs) (CWR mutant and over-expression lines) may be exploited for producing edible oilseed crops with both improved resistance against various (a)biotic stresses and enhanced seed-oil and fatty acid composition and quality. Extensive research on this aspect in edible oilseed crops would yield promising results. Efforts should be made to focus also on omics profiling tools (such as genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and phenomics), which may make the genetic improvement of discussed above major edible oilseed crops easy, feasible, and successful. Moreover, in the pursuit of the genetic improvement of the major/dominating, and also minor (underutilized, or neglected) edible oilseed crops, there is urgent need to adopt the use of genome editing technology based mainly on Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR).

A trend of using the major oilseed crops as a sustainable alternative for energy generation is rapidly increasing. However, this could threaten both the nutritious food availability and also the food security particularly in developing countries. Hence, the use of either of the major and minor edible oilseed crops as an alternative for biodiesel etc., could only be profitable when these crops are produced on a large scale.

References

  1. 1. Zhou Y, Zhao W, Lai Y, Zhang B, Zhang D. Edible plant oil: Global status, health issues, and perspectives. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020;11:1315
  2. 2. Barthelmie RJ. Impact of dietary meat and animal products on GHG footprints: The UK and the US. Climate. 2022;10(3):43
  3. 3. Hammons RO, Herman D, Stalker HT. Origin and early history of the peanut. In: Stalker HT, editor. Peanuts: Peanuts: Genetics, Processing, and Utilization. Urbana, Illinois: AOCS Press; 2016. pp. 1-26
  4. 4. Elleuch M, Besbes S, Roiseux O, et al. Quality characteristics of sesame seeds and byproducts. Food Chemistry. 2007;10:641-650
  5. 5. Geleta M, Stymne S, Bryngelsson T. Variation and inheritance of oil content and fatty acid composition in Niger (Guizotia abyssinica). Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2011;24(7):995-1003
  6. 6. Singer WM, Lee YC, Shea Z, Vieira CC, Lee D, Li X, et al. Soybean genetics, genomics, and breeding for improving nutritional value and reducing antinutritional traits in food and feed. The Plant Genome. 2023;16(4):e20415
  7. 7. Ojiewo CO, Janila P, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Pandey MK, Desmae H, Okori P, et al. Advances in crop improvement and delivery research for nutritional quality and health benefits of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020;11:29
  8. 8. Raymer PL. Canola: An emerging oilseed crop. In: Janick J, Whipkey A, editors. Trends in New Crops and New Uses. Alexandria. Virginia: ASHS Press; 2002. pp. 122-126
  9. 9. Nagaharu U. Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Japan. Journal of Botany. 1935;7:389-452
  10. 10. Hedge IC. A systematic and geographical survey of the world cruciferae. In: Vaughan JG, McLeod AJ, Jones BMG, editors. The Biology and Chemistry of Cruciferae. New York: Academic Press; 1976. pp. 1-45
  11. 11. Gupta SK. Brassicas. In: Gupta SK, editor. Breeding Oilseed Crops for Sustainable Production: Opportunities and Constraints. Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States: Academic Press; 2016. pp. 33-53
  12. 12. Hemingway JS. Mustards, Brassica spp. and Sinapis alba (Cruciferae). In: Simmonds NW, editor. Evolution of Crop Plants. New York: Longman; 1976. pp. 19-21
  13. 13. Prakash S. Cruciferous oilseeds in India. In: Tsumoda S, Hinata K, Gomes Campo C, editors. Brassica Crops and Wild Allies: Biology and Breeding. Tokyo: Japan Science Society Press; 1980. pp. 151-163
  14. 14. Shahidi F. Rapeseed and canola: Global production and distribution. In: Shahidi F, editor. Canola and Rapeseed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1990. pp. 3-14
  15. 15. Liu K. Soybeans: Chemistry, Technology, and Utilization. New York: Chapman & Hall; 2012
  16. 16. Sedivy EJ, Wu F, Hanzawa Y. Soybean domestication: The origin, genetic architecture and molecular bases. New Phytologist. 2017;214(2):539-553
  17. 17. Ku YS, Ng MS, Cheng SS, Luk CY, Ludidi N, Chung G, et al. Soybean secondary metabolites and flavors: The art of compromise among climate, natural enemies, and human culture. In: Lam HM, Li MW, editors. Advances in Botanical Research. New York: Academic Press; 2022. pp. 295-347
  18. 18. Lay CL, Dybing CD. Linseed. In: Robbelen G, Downey R, Ashri A, editors. Oil Crops of the World. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company; 1989. pp. 416-430
  19. 19. Siemens B, Winnipeg MB. Quality of Western Canadian Flaxseed. Winnipeg, Canada: Canadian Grain Commission; 2017
  20. 20. Herchi W, Sakouhi F, Arráez-Román D, Segura-Carretero A, Boukhchina S, Kallel H, et al. Changes in the content of phenolic compounds in flaxseed oil during development. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society. 2011;88:1135-1142
  21. 21. Kauser S, Hussain A, Ashraf S, Fatima G, Javaria S, Abideen ZU, et al. Flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum); phytochemistry, pharmacological characteristics and functional food applications. Food Chemistry Advances. 2024;4:100573
  22. 22. Khurana S, Singh R. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) seed. In: Tanwar B, Goyal A, editors. Oilseeds: Health Attributes and Food Applications. Singapore: Springer; 2021. pp. 123-143
  23. 23. Noureddine B, Elachouri M, Bussmann RW. Helianthus annuus L. Asteraceae. In: Bussmann RW, Elachouri M, Kikvidze Z, editors. Ethnobotany of Northern Africa and Levant. Ethnobotany of Mountain Regions. Cham: Springer; 2024. pp. 1-7
  24. 24. Yadav R, Kalia S, Rangan P, Pradheep K, Rao GP, Kaur V, et al. Current research trends and prospects for yield and quality improvement in sesame, an important oilseed crop. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;6(13):863521
  25. 25. Fuller DQ. Further evidence on the prehistory of sesame. Asian Agri-History. 2003;7(2):127-137
  26. 26. Gupta M, Singh N, Singh B, Alam P. Role of natural products in alleviation of Huntington's disease: An overview. South African Journal of Botany. 2022;151:263-276
  27. 27. Hegde DM. Sesame. In: Peter KV, editor. Handbook of Herbs and Spices. Sawston, United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing; 2012, 2012. pp. 449-486
  28. 28. Nakano D, Itoh C, Takaoka M, et al. Anti-hypertensive effect of sesamin inhibition of vascular superoxide production by sesamin. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2002;25:1247-1249
  29. 29. Sharma S, Pokharia AK, Kumar A, Srivastava A, Yadav R. Carthamus L.: Origin, distribution and its archaeological records in India. Journal of Palaeosciences. 2022;71(2):177-186
  30. 30. Harlan JR. Crops and Man. 2nd ed. Madison (United States): American Society of Agronomy; 1992
  31. 31. Knowles PF. Centers of plant diversity and conservation of crop germplasm: Safflower. Economic Botany. 1969;23:324-329
  32. 32. Ali F, Nadeem MA, Habyarimana E, et al. Molecular characterization of genetic diversity and similarity centers of safflower accessions with ISSR markers. Brazilian Journal of Botany. 2020;43:109-121
  33. 33. Yildiz M, Altaf MT, Baloch FS, et al. Assessment of genetic diversity among 131 safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) accessions using peroxidase gene polymorphism (POGP) markers. Molecular Biology Reports. 2022;49:6531-6539
  34. 34. Wu Z, Liu H, Zhan W, Yu Z, Qin E, Liu S, et al. The chromosome-scale reference genome of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) provides insights into linoleic acid and flavonoid biosynthesis. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2021;19(9):1725-1742
  35. 35. Ebrahimian E, Seyyedi SM, Bybordi A, Damalas CA. Seed yield and oil quality of sunflower, safflower, and sesame under different levels of irrigation water availability. Agricultural Water Management. 2019;218:149-157
  36. 36. Getinet A, Sharma SM. Niger. Guizotia abyssinica (L. f.) Cass. In: Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilized and Neglected Crops. Rome (Italy): Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Re-sources Institute; 1996
  37. 37. Mariod AA, Mirghani MES, Hussein IH. Unconventional Oilseeds and Oil Sources. Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States: Academic Press; 2017
  38. 38. Solomon WK, Nkambule TP. Biological activities and antioxidant properties of Guizotia abyssinica (Niger) seed oil. In: Mariod AA, editor. Multiple Biological Activities of Unconventional Seed Oils. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press; 2022. pp. 77-90
  39. 39. Mallikarjuna G, Rao TSRB, Kirti PB. Genetic engineering for peanut improvement: Current status and prospects. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture. 2016;125:399-416
  40. 40. Emara EI, Moursy MA, Hamed LM. Response of certain peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) varieties to water regime using different irrigation systems in new reclaimed areas. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 2023;22(4):245-260
  41. 41. Maurya AC, Verma SK, Kumar S, Shekhar S, Taria S, Alam B, et al. Agronomic management: Irrigation scheduling, mulching and integrated nutrient management influences growth, yields, quality, and economics of summer groundnut in a subtropical condition of India. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2024;47(8):1200-1213
  42. 42. Elshamly AM, Nassar SM. Impacts of cobalt and zinc on improving peanuts nutrient uptake, yield and irrigation water use efficiency under different irrigation levels. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1):7188
  43. 43. Elshamly AM. Cobalt combined with potassium humate as beneficial applications in alleviating water stress impacts on groundnut during sensitive growth stages. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2023;23(3):4505-4520
  44. 44. Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Rao JS, Vadez V, Dumbala SR, Rathore A, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, et al. Transgenic peanut overexpressing the DREB1A transcription factor has higher yields under drought stress. Molecular Breeding. 2014;33:327-340
  45. 45. Pandurangaiah M, Lokanadha Rao G, Sudhakarbabu O, Nareshkumar A, Kiranmai K, Lokesh U, et al. Overexpression of horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum Lam. Verdc.) NAC transcriptional factor (MuNAC4) in groundnut confers enhanced drought tolerance. Molecular Biotechnology. 2014;56:758-769
  46. 46. Chu Y, Deng X, Faustinelli P, Ozias-Akins P. Bcl-xL transformed peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) exhibits paraquat tolerance. Plant Cell Report. 2008;27:85-92
  47. 47. Asif MA, Zafar Y, Iqbal J, Iqbal MM, Rashid U, Ali GM, et al. Enhanced expression of AtNHX1, in transgenic groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) improves salt and drought tolerance. Molecular Biotechnology. 2011;49:250-256
  48. 48. Tiwari S, Mishra DK, Singh A, Singh PK, Tuli R. Expression of a synthetic cry1EC gene for resistance against Spodoptera litura in transgenic peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Cell Report. 2008;27:1017-1025
  49. 49. Geng L, Niu L, Gresshoff PM, Shu C, Song F, Huang D, et al. Efficient production of Agrobacterium rhizogenes-transformed roots and composite plants in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture. 2012;109:491-500
  50. 50. Ali S, Mir ZA, Tyagi A, Mehari H, Meena RP, Bhat JA, et al. Overexpression of NPR1 in Brassica juncea confers broad spectrum resistance to fungal pathogens. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8:1693
  51. 51. Verma S, Dubey N, Singh KH, Parmar N, Singh L, Sharma D, et al. Utilization of crop wild relatives for biotic and abiotic stress management in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. & Coss.]. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023;14:1277922
  52. 52. Borhan MH, Holub EB, Kindrachuk C, Omidi M, Bozorgmanesh-Frad G, Rimmer SR. WRR4, a broad-spectrum TIR-NB-LRR gene from Arabidopsis thaliana that confers white rust resistance in transgenic oilseed brassica crops. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2010;11:283-291
  53. 53. Plieske J, Struss D. STS markers linked to Phoma resistance genes of the Brassica B-genome revealed sequence homology between Brassica nigra and Brassica napus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2001;102:483-488
  54. 54. Chadar L, Singh R, Singh R, Yadav RR, Mishra MK, Pratap N, et al. Studies on Alternaria blight of rapeseed-mustard (Brassica juncea L.) caused by Alternaria brassicae (Berk.) Sacc. and its integrated management. Plant Archives. 2016;16:897-901
  55. 55. Rana K, Atri C, Akhatar J, Kaur R, Goyal A, Singh MP, et al. Detection of first marker trait associations for resistance against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Brassica junce-Erucastrum cardaminoides introgression lines. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019;10:1015
  56. 56. Taylor JD, Conway J, Roberts SJ, Astley D, Vicente JG. Sources and origin of resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. Campestris in Brassica genomes. Phytopathology. 2002;92:105-111
  57. 57. Tonguç M, Griffiths PD. Development of black rot resistant interspecific hybrids between Brassica oleracea L. cultivars and Brassica accession A 19182, using embryo rescue. Euphytica. 2004;136:313-318
  58. 58. Zhu L, Li Y, Ara N, Yang J, Zhang M. Role of a newly cloned alternative oxidase gene (BjAOX1a) in turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) resistance in mustard. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 2012;30:309-318
  59. 59. Khan V, Princi MM, Umar S, Iqbal N. Methyl jasmonate and Pseudomonas fluorescens synergistically boost antioxidative defense, secondary metabolites, and osmolyte production to enhance drought resilience in mustard. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s00344-024-11310-1
  60. 60. Bhardwaj AR, Joshi G, Kukreja B, et al. Global insights into high temperature and drought stress regulated genes by RNA-Seq in economically important oilseed crop Brassica juncea. BMC Plant Biology. 2015;15:9
  61. 61. Wei J, Xu L, Shi Y, Cheng T, Tan W, Zhao Y, et al. Transcriptome profile analysis of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) during seed germination reveals the drought stress-induced genes associated with energy, hormone, and phenylpropanoid pathways. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2023;200:107750
  62. 62. Iqbal N, Umar S, Khan NA. Nitrogen availability regulates proline and ethylene production and alleviates salinity stress in mustard (Brassica juncea). Journal of Plant Physiology. 2015;178:84-91
  63. 63. Gupta P, Seth CS. 24-epibrassinolide regulates functional components of nitric oxide signalling and antioxidant defense pathways to alleviate salinity stress in Brassica juncea L. cv. Varuna. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2023;42(7):4207-4222
  64. 64. Phour M, Sindhu SS. Amelioration of salinity stress and growth stimulation of mustard (Brassica juncea L.) by salt-tolerant pseudomonas species. Applied Soil Ecology. 2020;149:103518
  65. 65. Saxena SC, Salvi P, Kamble NU, Joshi PK, Majee M, Arora S. Ectopic overexpression of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase gene (Apx1) improves salinity stress tolerance in Brassica juncea by strengthening antioxidative defense mechanism. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2020;42:1-4
  66. 66. Limbalkar OM, Vasisth P, Singh G, Jain P, Sharma M, Singh R, et al. Dissection of QTLs conferring drought tolerance in B. carinata derived B. juncea introgression lines. BMC Plant Biology. 2023;23(1):664
  67. 67. Makvandi N, Ghorbani A, Rostami M, Rostami A, Ghasemi-Soloklui AA. Identification of key genes involved in heat stress response in Brassica napus L.: Reconstruction of gene networks, hub genes, and promoter analysis. Iranian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding. 2022;11(1):71-86
  68. 68. Rahaman M, Mamidi S, Rahman M. Genome-wide association study of heat stress-tolerance traits in spring-type Brassica napus L. under controlled conditions. Crop Journal. 2018;6:115-125
  69. 69. Chen S, Hayward A, Dey SS, Choudhary M, Witt Hmon KP, et al. Quantitative trait loci for heat stress tolerance in Brassica rapa L. are distributed across the genome and occur in diverse genetic groups, flowering phenologies and morphotypes. Genes (Basel). 2022;13(2):296
  70. 70. Liang Z, Li M, Liu Z, Wang J. Genome-wide identification and characterization of the Hsp70 gene family in allopolyploid rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) compared with its diploid progenitors. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7511
  71. 71. Ghorbani R, Zakipour Z, Alemzadeh A, Razi H. Genome-wide analysis of AP2/ERF transcription factors family in Brassica napus. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 2020;26:1463-1476
  72. 72. Di F, Jian H, Wang T, Chen X, Ding Y, Du H, et al. Genome-wide analysis of the PYL gene family and identification of PYL genes that respond to abiotic stress in Brassica napus. Genes. 2018;9:156
  73. 73. Singh KP, Kumari P, Rai PK. Current status of the disease-resistant gene(s)/QTLs, and strategies for improvement in Brassica juncea. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021;12:617405
  74. 74. Bellaloui N, Gillen AM, Mengistu A, Kebede H, Fisher DK, et al. Responses of nitrogen metabolism and seed nutrition to drought stress in soybean genotypes differing in slow-wilting phenotype. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2013;4:498
  75. 75. Sadak MS, El-Hameid A, Asmaa R, Zaki FSA, Dawood MG, El-Awadi ME. Physiological and biochemical responses of soybean (Glycine max L.) to cysteine application under sea salt stress. Bulletin of the National Research Centre. 2020;44:1-10
  76. 76. Leisner CP, Yendrek CR, Ainsworth EA. Physiological and transcriptomic responses in the seed coat of field-grown soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) to abiotic stress. BMC Plant Biology. 2017;17:1-11
  77. 77. Homrich MS, Wiebke-Strohm B, Weber RLM, Bodanese-Zanettini MH. Soybean genetic transformation: A valuable tool for the functional study of genes and the production of agronomically improved plants. Genetics and Molecular Biology. 2012;35:998-1010
  78. 78. Cai Y, Wang L, Chen L, Wu T, Liu L, Sun S, et al. Mutagenesis of GmFT2a and GmFT5a mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 contributes for expanding the regional adaptability of soybean. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2020;18:298-309
  79. 79. Chen X, Yang S, Zhang Y, Zhu X, Yang X, et al. Generation of male-sterile soybean lines with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Crop Journal. 2021;9:1270-1277
  80. 80. Yao D, Zhou J, Zhang A, Wang J, Liu Y, Wang L, et al. Advances in CRISPR/Cas9-based research related to soybean [Glycine max (Linn.) Merr] molecular breeding. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023;14:1247707
  81. 81. Wang D, Du M, Lyu P, Li J, Meng H, Liu X, et al. Functional characterization of the soybean Glycine max actin depolymerization factor GmADF13 for plant resistance to drought stress. Plants. 2024;13(12):1651
  82. 82. Antwi-Boasiako A, Jia S, Liu J, Guo N, Chen C, Karikari B, et al. Identification and genetic dissection of resistance to red crown rot disease in a diverse soybean germplasm population. Plants. 2024;13(7):940
  83. 83. Heller K, Byczyńska M. The impact of environmental factors and applied agronomy on quantitative and qualitative traits of flax fiber. Journal of Natural Fibers. 2015;12:26-38
  84. 84. Soto-Cerda BJ, Cloutier S, Gajardo HA, Aravena G, Quian R. Identifying drought-resilient flax genotypes and related candidate genes based on stress indices, root traits and selective sweep. Euphytica. 2019;215:4
  85. 85. Soto-Cerda BJ, Cloutier S, Gajardo HA, Aravena G, Quian R, You FM. Drought response of flax accessions and identification of quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs) governing agronomic and root traits by genome-wide association analysis. Molecular Breeding. 2020;40:1-24
  86. 86. Qi XS, Wang XR, Xu J, Zhang JP, Mi J. Drought-resistance evaluation of flax germplasm at adult plant stage. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 2010;43:3076-3087
  87. 87. Asgarinia P, Mirlohi A, Saeidi G, Mohamadi-Mirik AA, Gheysari M, et al. Selection criteria for assessing drought tolerance in a segregating population of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2017;97:424-437
  88. 88. Dubey S, Bhargava A, Fuentes F, Shukla S, Srivastava S. Effect of salinity stress on yield and quality parameters in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2020;48:954-966
  89. 89. El-Afry MM, El-Okkiah SA, El-Kady ESA, El-Yamanee GSA. Exogenous application of ascorbic acid for alleviation the adverse effects of salinity stress in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Middle East Journal. 2018;7:716-739
  90. 90. Kocak MZ, Göre M, Kurt O. The effect of different salinity levels on germination development of some flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) varieties. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2022;10:657-662
  91. 91. Wu J, Zhao Q, Wu G, Yuan H, Ma Y, Lin H, et al. Comprehensive analysis of differentially expressed unigenes under NaCl stress in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) using RNA-Seq. International Journal of Molecular Science. 2019;20:369
  92. 92. Cross RH, McKay SAB, McHughen AG, Bonham-Smith PC. Heat stress effects on reproduction and seed set in Linum usitatissimum L. (flax). Plant Cell and Environment. 2003;26:1013-1020
  93. 93. Saha D, Shaw AK, Datta S, Mitra J. Evolution and functional diversity of abiotic stress-responsive NAC transcription factor genes in Linum usitatissimum L. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2021;188:104512
  94. 94. Rashid KY. Principal Diseases of Flax. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Inc.; 2003. pp. 92-123
  95. 95. Saha D, Mukherjee P, Dutta S, et al. Genomic insights into HSFs as candidate genes for high-temperature stress adaptation and gene editing with minimal off-target effects in flax. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:5581
  96. 96. Ramsay A, Fliniaux O, Fang J, Molinie R, Roscher A, Grand E, et al. Development of an NMR metabolomics-based tool for selection of flaxseed varieties. Metabolomics. 2014;10:1258-1267
  97. 97. Nemri A, Saunders DG, Anderson C, Upadhyaya NM, Win J, Lawrence GJ, et al. The genome sequence and effector complement of the flax rust pathogen Melampsora lini. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2014;5:98
  98. 98. You FM, Rashid KY, Zheng C, Khan N, Li P, Xiao J, et al. Insights into the genetic architecture and genomic prediction of powdery mildew resistance in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23(9):4960
  99. 99. Wu J, Zhao Q, Sun D, Wu G, Zhang L, Yuan H, et al. Transcriptome analysis of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) undergoing osmotic stress. Industrial Crop Production. 2018;116:215-223
  100. 100. Adhikary D, da Costa Ribeiro Quintans ILA, Bhowmik PK. A procedure to design guide RNA, assemble fragments, and detect mutation for genome editing in flax. In: Islam MT, Bhowmik PK, Molla KA, editors. CRISPR-Cas Methods. New York, United States: Springer Protocols Handbooks. Humana; 2020. pp. 73-190
  101. 101. Puttha R, Venkatachalam K, Hanpakdeesakul S, Wongsa J, Parametthanuwat T, et al. Exploring the potential of sunflowers: Agronomy, applications, and opportunities within bio-circular-green economy. Horticulturae. 2023;9(10):1079
  102. 102. van der Merwe R, Labuschagne MT, Herselman L, Hugo A. Effect of heat stress on seed yield components and oil composition in high-and mid-oleic sunflower hybrids. South African Journal of Plant and Soil. 2015;32(3):121-128
  103. 103. Rondanini D, Savin R, Hall AJ. Dynamics of fruit growth and oil quality of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) exposed to brief intervals of high temperature during grain-filling. Field Crops Research. 2003;83:79-90
  104. 104. Debaeke P, Casadebaig P, Flenet F, Langlade N. Sunflower crop and climate change: Vulnerability, adaptation, and mitigation potential from case-studies in Europe. OCL Oilseeds and Fats Crops and Lipids. 2017;24(1):15
  105. 105. Tewari S, Arora NK. Ameliorating the growth of sunflower using stress-tolerant Pseudomonas aeruginosa PF23. Climate Change and Environmental Sustainability. 2014;2(2):116-121
  106. 106. Tewari S, Arora NK. Fluorescent pseudomonas sp. PF17 as an efficient plant growth regulator and biocontrol agent for sunflower crop under saline conditions. Symbiosis. 2016;68:99-108
  107. 107. Moschen S, Di Rienzo JA, Higgins J, Tohge T, Watanabe M, González S, et al. Integration of transcriptomic and metabolic data reveals hub transcription factors involved in drought stress response in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Molecular Biology. 2017;94:549-564
  108. 108. Moroldo M, Blanchet N, Duruflé H, et al. Genetic control of abiotic stress-related specialized metabolites in sunflower. BMC Genomics. 2024;25:199
  109. 109. Jocković M, Jocić S, Cvejić S, Marjanović-Jeromela A, Jocković J, et al. Genetic improvement in sunflower breeding - integrated omics approach. Plants. 2021;10(6):1150
  110. 110. Dimitrijevic A, Horn R. Sunflower hybrid breeding: From markers to genomic selection. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2018;8:2238
  111. 111. Bán R, Kiss J, Pálinkás Z, Körösi K. Placing management of sunflower downy mildew (Plasmopara halstedii (Farl.) Berl. Et de Toni) under an integrated pest management (IPM) system approach: Challenges and new perspectives. Agronomy. 2023;13(4):1029
  112. 112. Shamimuzzaman M, Ma G, Underwood W, Qi L. Mutation and sequencing-based cloning and functional studies of a rust resistance gene in sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Plant Journal. 2023;115(2):480-493
  113. 113. Yousif AI, Almuslimawi A, Turóczi G, Kiss J, Kovács A, Körösi K. Efficacy of some plant resistance inducers against several sunflower downy mildew (Plasmopara halstedii (Farl.) Berl. et de Toni) isolates. Acta Biologica Szegediensis. 2023;67(1):75-86
  114. 114. Martín-Sanz A, Malek J, Fernández-Martínez JM, Pérez-Vich B. Velasco L increased virulence in sunflower broomrape (Orobanche cumana Wallr.) populations from southern Spain is associated with greater genetic diversity. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7:589
  115. 115. Zhang N, Ali S, Huang Q, Yang C, Ali B, Chen W, et al. Seed pretreatment with brassinosteroids stimulates sunflower immunity against parasitic weed (Orobanche cumana) infection. Physiologia Plantarum. 2024;176(3):e14324
  116. 116. Troncoso-Ponce MA, Kilaru A, Cao X, et al. Comparative deep transcriptional profiling of four developing oilseeds. Plant Journal. 2011;68:1014-1027
  117. 117. Avashthi H, Angadi UB, Chauhan D, Kumar A, Mishra DC, Rangan P, et al. Sesame genomic web resource (SesameGWR): A well-annotated data resource for transcriptomic signatures of abiotic and biotic stress responses in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Briefings in Functional Genomics. 2024:elae022
  118. 118. Koca H, Bor M, Zdemir FO, Turkan I. The effect of salt stress on lipid peroxidation, antioxidative enzymes and proline content of sesame cultivars. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007;60:344-351
  119. 119. Boureima S, Eyletters M, Diouf M, et al. Sensitivity of seed germination and seedling radicle growth to drought stress in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Research Journal of Environmental Science. 2011;5:557-564
  120. 120. Ucan K, Killi F, Gencoglan C, Merdun H. Effect of irrigation frequency and amount on water use efficiency and yield of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) under field conditions. Field Crops Research. 2007;101(3):249-258
  121. 121. Dossa K, Li D, Zhou R, Yu J, Wang L, Zhang Y, et al. The genetic basis of drought tolerance in the high oil crop Sesamum indicum. Journal of Plant Biotechnology. 2019;17:1788-1803
  122. 122. Weldemichael MY, Gebremedhn HM. Omics technologies towards sesame improvement: A review. Molecular Biology Report. 2023;50:6885-6899
  123. 123. Rao GP, Un NS, MadhuPriya. Overview on a century progress in research on sesame phyllody disease. Phytopathogenic Mollicutes. 2015;5:74-83
  124. 124. Islam F, Gill RA, Ali B, Farrroq MA, Xu L, Najeeb U, et al. Sesame. In: Gupta SK, editor. Sesame, Breeding Oilseed Crops for Sustainable Production: Opportunities and Constraints. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2016. pp. 135-147
  125. 125. Yan W, Ni Y, Liu X, Zhao H, Chen Y, Jia M, et al. The mechanism of sesame resistance against Macrophomina phaseolina was revealed via a comparison of transcriptomes of resistant and susceptible sesame genotypes. BMC Plant Biology. 2021;21:159
  126. 126. Kavak H, Boydak E. Screening of the resistance levels of 26 sesame breeding lines to Fusarium wilt disease. Plant Pathology Journal. 2006;5(2):157-160
  127. 127. El-Bramawy MAS, Abd Al-Wahid OA. Evaluation of resistance of selected sesame (Sesamum indicum) genotypes to Fusarium wilt disease caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. sesami. Tunisian Journal of Plant Protection. 2009;4:29-39
  128. 128. Wasson AP, Richards RA, Chatrath R, Misra SC, Prasad SS, Rebetzke GJ, et al. Traits and selection strategies to improve root systems and water uptake in water-limited wheat crops. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2012;63(9):3485-3498
  129. 129. Yau SK. Winter versus spring sowing of rain-fed safflower in a semi-arid, high-elevation Mediterranean environment. European Journal of Agronomy. 2007;26(3):249-256
  130. 130. Koutroubas SD, Papakosta DK, Doitsinis A. Phenotypic variation in physiological determinants of yield in spring sown safflower under Mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Research. 2009;112(2-3):199-204
  131. 131. Kafi M, Rostami M. Yield characteristics and oil content of three safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars under drought in reproductive stage and irrigation with saline water. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 2007;5(1):121-131
  132. 132. Tonnis B, Wang ML, Li X, Wang J, Puppala N, Tallury S, et al. Peanut FAD2 genotype and growing location interactions significantly affect the level of oleic acid in seeds. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society. 2020;97:1001-1010
  133. 133. Oz M. Relationship between sowing time, variety, and quality in safflower. Journal of Chemistry. 2016;2016:9835641
  134. 134. Sajid M, Munir H, Rauf S, Ibtahaj I, Paray BA, Kiełtyka-Dadasiewicz A, et al. How climate variability affects safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) yield, oil, and fatty acids in response to sowing dates. Horticulturae. 2024;10(6):539
  135. 135. Nitnaware KM, Naikawadi VB, Chavan SS, Shelke DB, Barmukh RB, et al. Genetic engineering in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.): Retrospect and prospect. In: Kavi Kishor PB, Rajam MV, Pullaiah T, editors. Genetically Modified Crops. Singapore: Springer; 2021. pp. 201-226
  136. 136. Pushpa HD, Kumaraswamy HH, Thomas HB, Ushakiran B, Sharma D, Anjani K, et al. Innovative approaches for genetic improvement of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.): Current status and prospectus. In: Sharma D, Singh S, Sharma SK, Singh R, editors. Smart Plant Breeding for Field Crops in Post-Genomics Era. Singapore: Springer; 2023. pp. 293-342
  137. 137. Kalpana Sastry R, Chattopadhyay C. Safflower diseases. In: Saharan GS, Mehta N, Sangwan MS, editors. Diseases of Oilseed Crops. Vol. 2005. New Delhi, India: Indus Publ. Co; 2005. pp. 236-268
  138. 138. Singh N, Anand G, Kapoor R. Incidence and severity of fungal diseases of safflower in India. Crop Protection. 2019;125:104905
  139. 139. Hanumantharaya L, Balikai RA, Mallapur CP, Kumar CJ. Integrated pest management strategies against safflower aphid, Uroleucon compositae (Theobald). In: Safflower: Unexploited Potential and World Adaptability. Seventh International Safflower Conference, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia, 3-6 November, 2008. Agri-MC Marketing and Communication. 2008. pp. 1-12
  140. 140. Jegadeeswaran M, Kadirvel P, Srinivas PS, Senthilvel S, Selvaraj VM, et al. Genetic mapping reveals a major QTL associated with tolerance to the aphid, Uroleucon compositae (Theobald) in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius). Plant Breeding. 2021;140(2):320-330
  141. 141. Naik H, Devaraj V. Effect of salinity stress on antioxidant defense system of Niger (Guizotia abyssinica Cass.). American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2016;7:980-990
  142. 142. Sandipan PB, Jagtap PK, Patel MC. Alternaria and Cercospora leaf spot diseases of Niger (Guizotia abyssinica Cass.) - A traditional tribal crop of South Gujarat, India, with cost benefit ratio in relation to different fungicides. Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova. 2018;3(175):89-99
  143. 143. Naik HK, Varadahalli RD. Genomic identification of salt induced microRNAs in Niger (Guizotia abyssinica Cass.). Plant Gene. 2020;23:100242
  144. 144. Sujatha M, Suresh G, Helan TB, et al. Association of Golovinomyces ambrosiae and Podosphaera xanthii in causing powdery mildew disease of Guizotia abyssinica L.f. Cass in India. Australasian Plant Pathology. 2023;52:107-119
  145. 145. Ghane SG, Nikam TD. Growth and physiological alterations in Niger cultivars under drought stress. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2017;64:109-115
  146. 146. Gebeyehu A, Hammenhag C, Tesfaye K, Vetukuri RR, Ortiz R, Geleta M. RNA-Seq provides novel genomic resources for noug (Guizotia abyssinica) and reveals microsatellite frequency and distribution in its transcriptome. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;13:882136
  147. 147. Ganesan A, Dhanarajan A, Sellapillai L. Effect of gamma irradiation on quantitative traits and post harvesting analysis of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seed in M1generation. Plant Science Today. 2022;9(4):1074-1084
  148. 148. MVD. Mutant variety database (International Atomic Energy Agency/Mutant Variety Database, IAEA/MVD). 2022. Available from: https://mvd.iaea.org/ [Accessed: July 25, 2024]
  149. 149. Shen H, Xiong H, Guo X, Wang P, Duan P, Zhang L, et al. AhDMT1, a Fe2+ transporter, is involved in improving iron nutrition and N2 fixation in nodules of peanut intercropped with maize in calcareous soils. Planta. 2014;239:1065-1077
  150. 150. Xiong H, Kobayashi T, Kakei Y, Senoura T, Nakazono M, et al. AhNRAMP1 iron transporter is involved in iron acquisition in peanut. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2012;63(12):4437-4446
  151. 151. Sultana T, Malik K, Raja NI, Mashwani ZU, Hameed A, Ullah R, et al. Aflatoxins in peanut (Arachis hypogaea): Prevalence, global health concern, and management from an innovative nanotechnology approach: A mechanistic repertoire and future direction. ACS Omega. 2024;9(24):25555-25574
  152. 152. Pandey AK, Sudini HK, Upadhyaya HD, Varshney RK. Hypoallergenic groundnut lines identified through large-scale phenotyping of global diversity panel: Providing hope towards addressing one of the major global food safety concerns. Frontiers in Genetics. 2019;10:1177
  153. 153. Janila P, Pandey MK, Shasidhar Y, Murali TV, Sriswathi M, Khera P, et al. Molecular breeding for introgression of fatty acid desaturase mutant alleles (ahFAD2A and ahFAD2B) enhances oil quality in high and low oil containing groundnut genotypes. Plant Science. 2016;242:203-213
  154. 154. Gangadhara K, Nadaf HL. Inheritance of high oleic acid content in new sources of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Agricultural Science Digest. 2016;36:299-302
  155. 155. Wilson JN, Chopra R, Baring MR, Selvaraj MG, Simpson CE, et al. Advanced backcross quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis of oil concentration and oil quality traits in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Tropical Plant Biology. 2017;10:1-17
  156. 156. Upadhyaya HD, Reddy LJ, Gowda CLL, Singh S. Identification of diverse groundnut germplasm sources of early maturity in a core collection. Field Crops Research. 2006;97(2-3):261-271
  157. 157. Jannat S, Hassan MU, Ortiz GT, Shah MKN, Ahmed M, et al. Genetic characterization of flowering and phytochrome genes in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) for early maturity. Molecular Biology Report. 2022;49(6):5495-5504
  158. 158. Neelakandan AK, Wright DA, Traore SM, Chen X, Spalding MH, He G. CRISPR/Cas9 based site-specific modification of FAD2 cis-regulatory motifs in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L). Frontiers in Genetics. 2022;13:849961
  159. 159. Mahmood U, Li X, Qian M, Fan Y, Yu M, Li S, et al. Comparative transcriptome and co-expression network analysis revealed the genes associated with senescence and polygalacturonase activity involved in pod shattering of rapeseed. Biotechnology Biofuels Bioproduction. 2023;16(1):20
  160. 160. Raman H, Raman R, Sharma N, Cui X, McVittie B, Qiu Y, et al. Novel quantitative trait loci from an interspecific Brassica rapa derivative improve pod shatter resistance in Brassica napus. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023;14:1233996
  161. 161. Peng PF, Li YC, Mei DS, Colasanti J, Fu L, Liu J, et al. Expression divergence of FRUITFULL homeologs enhanced pod shatter resistance in Brassica napus. Genetics and Molecular Research. 2015;14(1):871-885
  162. 162. Zhang L, Li X, Chang L, Wang T, Liang J, Lin R, et al. Expanding the genetic variation of Brassica juncea by introgression of the Brassica rapa genome. Horticulture Research. 2022;9:uhab054
  163. 163. Kaur J, Akhatar J, Goyal A, Kaur N, Kaur S, Mittal M, et al. Genome wide association mapping and candidate gene analysis for pod shatter resistance in Brassica juncea and its progenitor species. Molecular Biology Report. 2020;47(4):2963-2974
  164. 164. Stimming M, Mesch CM, Kersting M, Libuda L. Fish and rapeseed oil consumption in infants and mothers: Dietary habits and determinants in a nationwide sample in Germany. European Journal of Nutrition. 2015;54:1069-1080
  165. 165. Russo M, Yan F, Stier A, Klasen L, Honermeier B. Erucic acid concentration of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) oils on the German food retail market. Food Science and Nutrition. 2021;9:3664-3672
  166. 166. Wang P, Xiong X, Zhang X, Wu G, Liu F. A review of erucic acid production in Brassicaceae oilseeds: Progress and prospects for the genetic engineering of high and low-erucic acid rapeseeds (Brassica napus). Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;13:899076
  167. 167. Wu G, Wu Y, Xiao L, Li X, Lu C. Zero erucic acid trait of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) results from a deletion of four base pairs in the fatty acid elongase 1 gene. Theoretical Applied Genetics. 2008;116:491-499
  168. 168. Fukai E, Karim MM, Shea DJ, Tonu NN, Falk KC, Funaki T, et al. An LTR retrotransposon insertion was the cause of world’s first low erucic acid Brassica rapa oilseed cultivar. Molecular. Breeding. 2019;39:15
  169. 169. Shi JH, Lang CX, Wu XL, Liu RH, Zheng T, Zhang DQ, et al. RNAi knockdown of fatty acid elongase1 alters fatty acid composition in Brassica napus. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2015;2015(466):518-522
  170. 170. Tian B, Wei F, Shu H, Zhang Q, Lian Y. Decreasing erucic acid level by RNAi-mediated silencing of fatty acid elongase 1 (BnFAE1.1) in rapeseeds (Brassica napus L.). African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;10:13194-13201
  171. 171. Liu Y, Du Z, Lin S, Li H, Lu S, Guo L, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of BnaFAE1 genes confers low-erucic acid in Brassica napus. Frontiers Plant Science. 2022;13:848723
  172. 172. Zhai Y, Yu K, Cai S, Hu L, Amoo O, Xu L, et al. Targeted mutagenesis of BnTT8 homologs controls yellow seed coat development for effective oil production in Brassica napus L. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2020;18(5):1153-1168
  173. 173. Zheng M, Zhang L, Tang M, Liu J, Liu H, Yang H, et al. Knockout of two BnaMAX1 homologs by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis improves plant architecture and increases yield in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2020;18:644-654
  174. 174. Anderson EJ, Ali ML, Beavis WD, Chen P, Clemente TE, Diers BW, et al. Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] breeding: History, improvement, production and future opportunities. In: Al-Khayri J, Jain S, Johnson D, editors. Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Legumes. Cham: Springer; 2019. pp. 431-516
  175. 175. Hwang EY, Song Q, Jia G, Specht JE, Hyten DL, et al. A genome-wide association study of seed protein and oil content in soybean. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:1-12
  176. 176. Lee S, Van K, Sung M, Nelson R, LaMantia J, McHale LK, et al. Genome-wide association study of seed protein, oil and amino acid contents in soybean from maturity groups I to IV. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2019;132(6):1639-1659
  177. 177. Zhou ZK, Jiang Y, Wang Z, Gou Z, Lyu J, Li W, et al. Resequencing 302 wild and cultivated accessions identifies genes related to domestication and improvement in soybean. Nature Biotechnology. 2015;33(4):408-414
  178. 178. Oliva ML, Shannon JG, Sleper DA, Ellersieck MR, Cardinal AJ, et al. Stability of fatty acid profile in soybean genotypes with modified seed oil composition. Crop Science. 2006;46:2069-2075
  179. 179. Liu A, Cheng SS, Yung WS, Li MW, Lam HM. Genetic regulations of the oil and protein contents in soybean seeds and strategies for improvement. Advances in Botanical Research. 2022;102:259-293
  180. 180. Duan Z, Li Q, Wang H, He X, Zhang M. Genetic regulatory networks of soybean seed size, oil and protein contents. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023;14:1160418
  181. 181. Di Q, Dong L, Jiang L, Liu X, Cheng P, Liu B, et al. Genome-wide association study and RNA-seq identifies GmWRI1-like transcription factor related to the seed weight in soybean. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023;14:1268511
  182. 182. Zhang P, Yang Z, Jia S, Chen G, Li N, Karikari B, et al. Genome-wide association study and candidate gene mining of seed size traits in soybean. Agronomy. 2024;14(6):1183
  183. 183. Anai T, Yamada T, Hideshima R, Kinoshita T, Rahman SM, Takagi Y. Two high-oleic-acid soybean mutants, M23 and KK21, have disrupted microsomal omega-6 fatty acid desaturase, encoded by GmFAD2-1a. Breeding Science. 2008;58:447-452
  184. 184. Yang J, Xing G, Niu L, He H, Guo D, Du Q, et al. Improved oil quality in transgenic soybean seeds by RNAi-mediated knockdown of GmFAD2-1B. Transgenic Research. 2018;27:155-166
  185. 185. Demorest ZL, Coffman A, Baltes NJ, Stoddard TJ, Clasen BM, Luo S, et al. Direct stacking of sequence-specific nuclease-induced mutations to produce high oleic and low linolenic soybean oil. BMC Plant Biology. 2016;16(1):225
  186. 186. Al Amin N, Ahmad N, Wu N, Pu XM, Ma T, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated targeted disruption of FAD2-2 microsomal omega-6 desaturase in soybean (Glycine max. L). BMC Biotechnology. 2019;19(1):9
  187. 187. Wu N, Lu Q, Wang PW, Zhang Q, Zhang J, et al. Construction and analysis of GmFAD2-1A and GmFAD2-2A soybean fatty acid desaturase mutants based on CRISPR/Cas9 technology. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(3):1104
  188. 188. Kanai M, Yamada T, Hayashi M, Mano S, Nishimura M. Soybean (Glycine max L.) triacylglycerol lipase GmSDP1 regulates the quality and quantity of seed oil. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:8924
  189. 189. Zhang YQ, Lu X, Zhao FY, Li QT, Niu SL, Wei W, et al. Soybean GmDREBL increases lipid content in seeds of transgenic Arabidopsis. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:34307
  190. 190. Chen L, Zheng YH, Dong ZM, Meng FF, Sun XM, Fan XH, et al. Soybean (Glycine max) WRINKLED1 transcription factor, GmWRI1a, positively regulates seed oil accumulation. Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 2018;293:401-415
  191. 191. Zhao X, Chang H, Feng L, Jing Y, Teng WL, Qiu LJ, et al. Genome-wide association mapping and candidate gene analysis for saturated fatty acid content in soybean seed. Plant Breeding. 2019;138:588-598
  192. 192. Xu Y, Yan F, Liu YJ, Wang Y, Gao H, Zhao SH, et al. Quantitative proteomic and lipidomics analyses of high oil content GmDGAT1-2 transgenic soybean illustrate the regulatory mechanism of lipoxygenase and oleosin. Plant Cell Reports. 2021;40:2303-2323
  193. 193. Li H, Zhou R, Liu P, Yang M, Xin D, Liu C, et al. Design of high-monounsaturated fatty acid soybean seed oil using GmPDCTs knockout via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2023;21(7):1317
  194. 194. Chen Y, Zhou XR, Zhang ZJ, Dribnenki P, Singh S, Green A. Development of high oleic oil crop platform in flax through RNAi-mediated multiple FAD2 gene silencing. Plant Cell Reports. 2015;34:643-653
  195. 195. Kumar S, You FM, Duguid S, Booker H, Rowland G, Cloutier S. QTL for fatty acid composition and yield in linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2015;128:965-984
  196. 196. Soto-Cerda BJ, Cloutier S, Quian R, Gajardo HA, Olivos M, You FM. Genome-wide association analysis of mucilage and hull content in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) seeds. International Journal of Molecular Science. 2018;19:2870
  197. 197. You F, Xiao J, Li P, Yao Z, Jia G, He L, et al. Genome-wide association study and selection signatures detect genomic regions associated with seed yield and oil quality in flax. International Journal of Molecular Science. 2018;19:2303
  198. 198. Abtahi M, Mirlohi A, Sharif-Moghaddam N, Ataii E. Revealing seed color variation and their possible association with yield and quality traits in a diversity panel of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;13:1038079
  199. 199. Rui-López N, Haslam RP, Venegas-Calerón M, Larson TR, Graham IA, Napier JA, et al. The synthesis and accumulation of stearidonic acid in trans- genic plants: A novel source of heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2009;7:704-716
  200. 200. Lorenc-Kukuła K, Zuk M, Kulma A, Czemplik M, Kostyn K, Skala J, et al. Engineering flax with the GT family 1 solanum sogarandinum glycosyltransferase SsGT1 confers increased resistance to Fusarium infection. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2009;57:6698-6705
  201. 201. Zuk M, Prescha A, Stryczewska M, Szopa J. Engineering flax plants to increase their antioxidant capacity and improve oil composition and stability. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2012;60:5003-5012
  202. 202. Dmitriev AA, Kezimana P, Rozhmina TA, Zhuchenko AA, Povkhova LV, et al. Genetic diversity of SAD and FAD genes responsible for the fatty acid composition in flax cultivars and lines. BMC Plant Biology. 2020;20:301
  203. 203. Dhirhi N, Mehta N, Singh S. Estimation of heterosis for seed yield and its attributing traits in linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology Applied Science. 2018;7(11):2332-2341
  204. 204. Kesiraju K, Tyagi S, Mukherjee S, Rai R, Singh NK, Sreevathsa R, et al. An apical meristem-targeted in planta transformation method for the development of transgenics in flax (Linum usitatissimum): Optimization and validation. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021;11:562056
  205. 205. Manimurugan C, Zanwar A, Sujatha M. Genetic enhancement of nutraceuticals in linseed: Breeding and molecular strategies. In: Kole C, editor. Compendium of Crop Genome Designing for Nutraceuticals. Singapore: Springer; 2023. pp. 1-25
  206. 206. Meena HP, Sujatha M. Sunflower breeding. In: Yadava DK, Dikshit HK, Mishra GP, Tripathi S, editors. Fundamentals of Field Crop Breeding. Singapore: Springer; 2022. pp. 971-1008
  207. 207. Venegas-Calerón M, Troncoso-Ponce MA, Martínez-Force E. Sunflower oil and lipids biosynthesis. In: Martínez-Force E, Dunford NT, Salas JJ, editors. Sunflower: Chemistry, Production, Processing, and Utilization. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Acdemic Press; 2015. pp. 259-295
  208. 208. Chernova AI, Gubaev RF, Singh A, et al. Genotyping and lipid profiling of 601 cultivated sunflower lines reveals novel genetic determinants of oil fatty acid content. BMC Genomics. 2021;22:505
  209. 209. Premnath A, Narayana M, Ramakrishnan C, Kuppusamy S, Chockalingam V. Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling oil content, oleic acid and linoleic acid content in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Molecular Breeding. 2016;36:1-7
  210. 210. Memon S, Baloch MJ, Baloch GM, et al. Combining ability through line × tester analysis for phenological, seed yield, and oil traits in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Euphytica. 2015;204:199-209
  211. 211. Cvejić S, Miladinović D, Jocić S. Mutation breeding for changed oil quality in sunflower. In: Tomlekova NB, Kozgar MI, Wani MR, editors. Mutagenesis: Exploring Genetic Diversity of Crops. Wageningen: Academic Publishers; 2014. pp. 77-96
  212. 212. Aktaş YE, Aydin Y, Uncuoglu AA. Induction of haploid plants for speed-up breeding in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by pollen irradiation. Genetics & Applications. 2023;7(1):35-44
  213. 213. Narayana M, Premnath A. Nutragenomic approaches in sunflower: Genetic improvement in oil quality. In: Compendium of Crop Genome Designing for Nutraceuticals. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2023. pp. 383-402
  214. 214. Wang S, Wong D, Forrest K, Allen A, Chao S, Huang BE, et al. Characterization of polyploid wheat genomic diversity using a high-density 90,000 single nucleotide polymorphism array. Plant Biotechnology. Journal. 2014;12:787-796
  215. 215. Wei X, Liu K, Zhang Y, Feng Q, Wang L, Zhao Y, et al. Genetic discovery for oil production and quality in sesame. Nature Communications. 2015;6:8609
  216. 216. Zhou R, Dossa K, Li D, Yu J, You J, Wei X, et al. Genome-wide association studies of 39 seed yield-related traits in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). International Journal of Molecular Science. 2018;19:2794
  217. 217. Ministry of Agriculture. Plant variety release. Protection and seed quality control directorate. In: Crop Variety Register, Ministry of Agriculture. Vol. 22. Ethiopia: Addis Ababa; 2019. p. 330
  218. 218. Van Zanten L. Sesame improvement by induced mutations: Results of the co-ordinated research project and recommendation for future studies. In: Sesame Improvement by Induced Mutations (Ed. IAEA-TECDOC-1195). Vienna (Austria). Vienna, Austria: FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture; 2001. p. 5
  219. 219. Bisht IS, Bhat KV, Lakhanpaul S, et al. Broadening the genetic base of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) through germplasm enhancement. Plant Genetic Resource. 2004;2:143-151
  220. 220. Vaikuntapu PR, Kumar VD. Applications and challenges of harnessing genome editing in oilseed crops. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2023;32:751-772
  221. 221. Kefale H, Wang L. Discovering favorable genes, QTLs, and genotypes as a genetic resource for sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) improvement. Frontiers in Genetics. 2022;13:1002182
  222. 222. You J, Li D, Yang L, Dossou SSK, Zhou R, Zhang Y, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;13:935825
  223. 223. Kumar S, Ambreen H, Murali TV, Bali S, Agarwal M, Kumar A, et al. Assessment of genetic diversity and population structure in a global reference collection of 531 accessions of Carthamus tinctorius L. (safflower) using AFLP markers. Plant Molecular Biology Report. 2015;33:1299-1313
  224. 224. Kumar S, Ambreen H, Variath MT, Rao AR, Agarwal M, Kumar A, et al. Utilization of molecular, phenotypic, and geographical diversity to develop compact composite core collection in the oilseed crop, safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) through maximization strategy. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7:1554
  225. 225. Ambreen H, Kumar S, Kumar A, Agarwal M, Jagannath A, Goel S. Association mapping for important agronomic traits in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) core collection using microsatellite markers. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2018;9:402
  226. 226. Cao S, Zhu Q-H, Shen W, Jiao X, Zhao X, Wang MB, et al. Comparative profiling of miRNA expression in developing seeds of high linoleic and high oleic safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) plants. Frontiers in Plant Sci. 2013;4:489
  227. 227. Nykiforuk CL, Shewmaker C, Harry I, Yurchenko OP, Zhang M, et al. High level accumulation of gamma linolenic acid (C18:3 Delta 6.9,12 cis) in transgenic safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) seeds. Transgenic Research. 2012;21:367-381
  228. 228. Wood CC, Okada S, Taylor MC, Menon A, Mathew A, et al. Seed-specific RNAi in safflower generates a superhigh oleic oil with extended oxidative stability. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2018;16:1788-1796
  229. 229. Rapson S, Wu M, Okada S, Das A, Shrestha P, Zhou X-R, et al. A case study on the genetic origin of the high oleic acid trait through FAD2-1 DNA sequence variation in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Frontiers in Plant Science. 2015;6:691
  230. 230. Geleta M, Bryngelsson T, Bekele E, et al. Genetic diversity of Guizotia abyssinica (L. f.) Cass. (Asteraceae) from Ethiopia as revealed by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 2007;54:601-614
  231. 231. Terefe M, Girma D. Development of molecular resources for the genetic improvement of noug (Guizotia abyssinica (L.f) Cass): A mini review. CABI Agriculture and Biosciences. 2022;3:52
  232. 232. Petros Y, Carlsson AS, Stymne S, Zeleke H, Fält AS, Merker A. Developing high oleic acid in Guizotia abyssinica (lf) Cass. By plant breeding. Plant Breeding. 2009;128(6):691-695
  233. 233. Chambhare MR, Nikam TD. In vitro induction and assessment of tetraploid plants from shoot cultures of diploid Niger (Guizotia abyssinica (lf) Cass.): A multipurpose oilseed crop. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2022;148(3):501-513
  234. 234. Vyawahare SV, Pagare R, Saoji PA. Mutagenic effect of gamma rays and EMS on agronomical traits of Niger [Guizotia abyssinica (L. f.) Cass.]. Crop Research. 2023;58(1and2):83-89
  235. 235. Suvarna. Mutation breeding in Niger (Guizotia abyssinica Cass): Review paper. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2020;9(4):3173-3176
  236. 236. Nagella P, Hosakatte NM, Ravishankar KV, Hahn EJ, Paek KY. Analysis of genetic diversity among Indian Niger [Guizotia abyssinica (L. f.) Cass.] cultivars based on randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 2008;11(1):140-144
  237. 237. Touchell DH, Palmer IE, Ranney TG. In vitro ploidy manipulation for crop improvement. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020;11:722
  238. 238. Maurya S, Sharma B, Thakur K, Rawte S, Patel NB, Bisen R, et al. In vitro double haploid production through anther culture in Niger (Guizotia abyssinica LF Cass). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant. 2024;60(1):50-66

Written By

Naser A. Anjum, Asim Masood, Faisal Rasheed, Palaniswamy Thangavel, Shahid Umar and Nafees A. Khan

Submitted: 02 August 2024 Reviewed: 06 September 2024 Published: 03 October 2024